Purpose Uterine fibroids are the most common pelvic tumors in women, representing the primary indication of hysterectomy. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists represent a new therapeutic option for premenopausal women. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GnRH antagonists in the treatment of uterine fibroids (size reduction and symptom control). Methods A review of studies from electronic databases (PubMed and Cochrane Central) published up to December 2023 was performed. Eleven randomized clinical trials with a total of 4164 patients were included in the review, which evaluated GnRH antagonists (Relugolix, Elagolix, Linzagolix and Cetrorelix) against placebo or GnRH agonists in premenopausal women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding. Results The results of the measures evaluated to determine the efficacy and safety of GnRH antagonists versus placebo are favorable for the variables of control of uterine bleeding (Relative risk (RR) = 5.09; 95% CI 3.19 to 8.14), percentage reduction of fibroid volume (Mean difference (MD) = -27.36; 95% CI −38.89 to −15.83) and lower reduction of bone density (MD -0.35; 95% CI −0.47 to −0.24). The results do not allow us to conclude whether there are differences between the alternatives compared in the control of vasomotor symptoms. Conclusions GnRH antagonists represent an effective alternative for uterine fibroids treatment as they allow a superior reduction in menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroid volume compared to the placebo group.

Background/Objectives: Unexplained infertility is a worldwide problem affecting a significant proportion of couples of reproductive age. Recent studies suggest that alterations in the vaginal microbiota are related to female infertility, while supplementation with some probiotic strains has been shown to improve pregnancy rates in couples experiencing this problem. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of oral administration of Ligilactobacillus salivarius CECT5713 on pregnancy success rates in couples with unexplained infertility prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods: Seventy couples were randomized to receive either a placebo or a probiotic intervention (one capsule per day containing an excipient only or 3 × 10⁹ viable cells of L. salivarius CECT5713 plus an excipient, respectively); 57 couples completed the study. Baseline data on demographics, health status (including gynecological and reproductive history), and lifestyle habits were collected. Vaginal swabs and semen samples were obtained from each couple before the intervention and immediately prior to IVF or upon confirmed pregnancy and were analyzed for microbiological (using both culture-dependent and -independent methods) and immunological profiles. Results: Oral administration of L. salivarius CECT5713 in couples with unexplained infertility scheduled for IVF resulted in a significantly higher pregnancy success rate (48.1%) compared to the placebo group (20.0%) (one-tailed Chi-square test; p < 0.024). The probiotic intervention improved both vaginal and semen immunological profiles, with no substantial changes observed in their microbial composition. Conclusions: These preliminary findings support the potential of L. salivarius CECT5713 supplementation to enhance fertility outcomes in couples with unexplained infertility.