Manjit Singh Matharu

Prof. Manjit Singh Matharu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2001 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABA Bahra
A Bahra
MMManjit Singh Matharu
Manjit Singh Matharu
CBC Buchel
C Buchel
RFRsj Frackowiak
Rsj Frackowiak
PGPj Goadsby
Pj Goadsby

31 May 2018 in Cephalalgia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VSVladimir Skljarevski
Vladimir Skljarevski
MMManjit Singh Matharu
Manjit Singh Matharu
BMBrian A Millen
Brian A Millen
MOMichael H Ossipov
Michael H Ossipov
BKByung-Kun Kim
Byung-Kun Kim
JYJyun Yan Yang
Jyun Yan Yang
Introduction: Galcanezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody binding calcitonin gene-related peptide, used for migraine prevention. Methods: A global, double-blind, 6-month study of patients with episodic migraine was undertaken with 915 intent-to-treat patients randomized to monthly galcanezumab 120 mg (n = 231) or 240 mg (n = 223) or placebo (n = 461) subcutaneous injections. Primary endpoint was overall mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days. Key secondary endpoints were ≥50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% response rates; monthly migraine headache days with acute migraine medication use; Patient Global Impression of Severity rating; the Role Function-Restrictive score of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Results: Mean monthly migraine headache days were reduced by 4.3 and 4.2 days by galcanezumab 120 and 240 mg, respectively, and 2.3 days by placebo. The group differences (95% CIs) versus placebo were 2.0 (−2.6, −1.5) and 1.9 (−2.4, −1.4), respectively. Both doses were superior to placebo for all key secondary endpoints. Injection site pain was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event, reported at similar rates in all treatment groups. Both galcanezumab doses had significantly more injection site reactions and injection site pruritus, and the 240 mg group had significantly more injection site erythema versus placebo. Conclusions: Galcanezumab 120 or 240 mg given once monthly was efficacious, safe, and well tolerated. Study identification: EVOLVE-2; NCT02614196; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02614196 . Trial Registration: NCT02614196.

1 January 2004 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMManjit Singh Matharu
Manjit Singh Matharu
TBThorsten Bartsch
Thorsten Bartsch
NWNick Ward
Nick Ward
RFRichard S. J. Frackowiak
Richard S. J. Frackowiak
RWRichard Weiner
Richard Weiner
PGPeter J. Goadsby
Peter J. Goadsby
Electrical stimulation of primary sensory afferents is known to have an antinociceptive effect. Animal and functional imaging studies suggest a role for supraspinal structures in this response. Eight patients with chronic migraine (≥15 days per month of attacks of migraine without aura), who had shown a marked beneficial response to implanted bilateral suboccipital stimulators, were studied. Stimulation evoked local paraesthesia, the presence of which was a criterion of pain relief. On stimulation, the headache began to improve instantaneously and was completely suppressed within 30 min. On switching off the stimulation, the headache recurred instantly and peaked within 20 min. PET scans were performed using regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as a marker of neuronal activity. Each patient was scanned in the following three states: (1) stimulator at optimum settings: patient pain‐free but with paraesthesia; (2) stimulator off: patient in pain and no paraesthesia; (3) stimulator partially activated: patient with intermediate levels of pain and paraesthesia. All scans were processed and analysed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) 99. There were significant changes in rCBF in the dorsal rostral pons, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and cuneus, correlated to pain scores, and in the ACC and left pulvinar, correlated to stimulation‐induced paraesthesia scores. The activation pattern in the dorsal rostral pons is highly suggestive of a role for this structure in the pathophysiology of chronic migraine. The localization and persistence of activity during stimulation is exactly consistent with a region activated in episodic migraine, and with the persistence of activation of that area after successful treatment. The dorsal rostral pons may be a locus of neuromodulation by suboccipital stimulation. In addition, suboccipital stimulation modulated activity in the left pulvinar.

2 February 2005 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SAS. K. Afridi
S. K. Afridi
MMManjit Singh Matharu
Manjit Singh Matharu
LLL. Lee
L. Lee
HKH. Kaube
H. Kaube
KFKarl Friston Friston
Karl Friston Friston
PGP. J. Goadsby
P. J. Goadsby
Migraine is a common disabling condition likely to be associated with dysfunction of brain pathways involved in pain and other sensory modalities. A cardinal, indeed signature, feature of the disorder that led to its name is that the pain may be lateralized. H215O-labelled PET was used to study 24 migraineurs and eight healthy controls. The migraineurs were divided into three groups according to the site of their headache: right, left or bilateral. In each group, a migraine was induced using a glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) infusion. The subjects were scanned at predefined points: pre-infusion, during GTN, during migraine and post-migraine. SPM99 software was used to analyse the data. Significant brainstem activation was seen in the dorsal lateral pons (P < 0.05 after small volume correction) during the migraine state versus the pain-free state when comparing migraineurs with controls. When each group was analysed separately, to investigate laterality, it was found that the dorsal pontine activation was ipsilateral in the right-sided and left-sided groups and bilateral in the bilateral headache group with a left-sided preponderance. Consistent with previous work, the activation persisted after pain was controlled by sumatriptan. These results suggest that lateralization of pain in migraine is due to lateralized brain dysfunction.

1 March 2021 in JAMA Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LDLinda D’aNtona
Linda D’aNtona
MMMelida Andrea Jaime Merchan
Melida Andrea Jaime Merchan
AVAnna Vassiliou
Anna Vassiliou
LWLaurence Dale Watkins
Laurence Dale Watkins
IDIndran Davagnanam
Indran Davagnanam
MMManjit Singh Matharu
Manjit Singh Matharu
The term spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) defines a clinical condition characterized by debilitating postural headaches secondary to spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and/or CSF hypotension. According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD), third edition, SIH is diagnosed when headache has developed spontaneously and in temporal relation to a CSF leak (evident on imaging) and/or CSF hypotension (lumbar puncture opening pressure <60 mm CSF).1

11 May 2005 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLM. J. Levy
M. J. Levy
MMManjit Singh Matharu
Manjit Singh Matharu
KMK. Meeran
K. Meeran
MPM. Powell
M. Powell
PGP. J. Goadsby
P. J. Goadsby
The clinical characteristics of 84 patients with pituitary tumour who had troublesome headache were investigated. The patients presented with chronic (46%) and episodic (30%) migraine, short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT; 5%), cluster headache (4%), hemicrania continua (1%) and primary stabbing headache (27%). It was not possible to classify the headache according to International Headache Society diagnostic criteria in six cases (7%). Cavernous sinus invasion was present in the minority of presentations (21%), but was present in two of three patients with cluster headache. SUNCT-like headache was only seen in patients with acromegaly and prolactinoma. Hypophysectomy improved headache in 49% and exacerbated headache in 15% of cases. Somatostatin analogues improved acromegaly-associated headache in 64% of cases, although rebound headache was described in three patients. Dopamine agonists improved headache in 25% and exacerbated headache in 21% of cases. In certain cases, severe exacerbations in headache were observed with dopamine agonists. Headache appears to be a significant problem in pituitary disease and is associated with a range of headache phenotypes. The presenting phenotype is likely to be governed by a combination of factors, including tumour activity, relationship to the cavernous sinus and patient predisposition to headache. A proposed modification of the current classification of pituitary-associated headache is given.