Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy has drastically changed the management of chronic inflammatory diseases. Some important drawbacks that can cause loss of response during treatment with these drugs are related to their large individual variability, the disease burden and the formation of antidrug antibodies that increase its clearance. Therapeutic drug monitoring of these drugs is not yet recommended by all scientific societies, and if so, only in patients with inflammatory symptoms. Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring represents a new strategy with many potential clinical benefits, including the prevention of immunogenicity, a reduction in the need for rescue therapy and greater durability of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment. The review is based on a systematic search of the literature for controlled trials, systematic reviews, experimental studies, guideline papers and cohort studies addressing the best practice in tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapeutic drug monitoring. Although there is ample evidence supporting the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice to achieve better outcomes, some challenges have been detected. Many studies are focused on finding solutions for the lack of standardization of analytical methods to measure tumour necrosis factor inhibitor and antidrug antibodies concentrations. Other challenges are development of effective cost-saving proactive algorithms to identify optimal drug concentrations and the research on the role of antidrug antibodies, especially in the management and prevention of loss of response. Therapeutic drug monitoring of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor offers a rational approach to the optimization of the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease. Although prospective controlled trials yield little conclusive evidence of its benefits, there is growing acceptance of its value in clinical practice.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of voriconazole is recommended for personalizing doses. The objective of this study was to compare the enzyme immunoassay developed by ARK ^TM Diagnostics Inc. for the quantification of voriconazole adapted to the Architect C4000 autoanalyzer (Abbott®) with ultra-performance liquid chromatography using ultraviolet detector (UPLC-UV) method. Materials and Methods: Linearity, precision and accuracy of both methods were validated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency guidelines. The limit of quantification (LOQ) of the UPLC-UV method was determined experimentally. Both methods were applied to the analysis of 62 samples from patients. Correlation was evaluated by Passing-Bablok analysis and the concordance by the Bland–Altman method. Dosage recommendations were generated; the discordances according to the technique were evaluated. Results: All validation parameters determined for UPLC-UV met the criteria set out and LOQ of 0.1 μg/mL was established. However, when the enzyme immunoassay was used to determine concentrations ≤1 μg/ml, CVs were >20%. A linear correlation between both methods was found. However, an overestimation of immunoassay (systematic error of 0.39 μg/mL) was detected. In 11.3% of the samples, the differences in concentrations when they were determined by different techniques would imply a different therapeutic regime. These samples had concentrations close to 1 μg/mL. Conclusion: Although both techniques can be used for TDM of voriconazole, when a value close to the lower limit of the therapeutic range is determined by the ARK ^TM immunoassay, it would be better to verify the result by a non-automated technique to avoid possible underdosing.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the safety and viral rebound, after analytical treatment interruption (ATI), of vedolizumab and ART in recent HIV-1 infection. We used this model to analyze the effect of α4β7 on the HIV-1 reservoir size. METHODS: Participants started ART with monthly vedolizumab infusions, and ATI was performed at week 24. Biopsies were obtained from ileum and cecum at baseline and week 24. Vedolizumab levels, HIV-1 reservoir, flow cytometry, and cell-sorting and antibody competition experiments were assayed. RESULTS: Vedolizumab was safe and well tolerated. No participant achieved undetectable viremia off ART 24 weeks after ATI. Only a modest effect on the time to achieve more than 1,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and the proportion of participants off ART was observed, being higher in the vedolizumab group compared with historical controls. Just before ATI, α4β7 expression was associated with HIV-1 DNA and RNA in peripheral blood and with PD1 and TIGIT levels. Importantly, a complete blocking of α4β7 was observed on peripheral CD4 ⁺ T cells but not in gut (ileum and cecum), where α4β7 blockade and vedolizumab levels were inversely associated with HIV-1 DNA. CONCLUSION: Our findings support α4β7 as an important determinant in HIV-1 reservoir size, suggesting the complete α4β7 blockade in tissue as a promising tool for HIV-cure combination strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03577782. FUNDING: This work was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, “a way to make Europe,” research contracts FI17/00186 and FI19/00083 and research projects PI18/01532, PI19/01127, PI22/01796), Conserjería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad, Junta de Andalucía (research projects P20/00906), the Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en SIDA (RD16/0025/0020), and the Spanish National Research Council.

Objective Switching patients from the originator infliximab to a biosimilar is a measure to expand access to treatments and counteract its negative impact on healthcare budgets. However, industry-independent long-term studies on the effect of switching in real life to support the lack of switch-related problems in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are sparse, as are studies addressing infliximab pharmacokinetic behaviour. The objectives were to investigate the effectiveness and the pharmacokinetics of CT-P13 after switching from originator infliximab in a real-world population of IBD patients with a follow-up of 2 years. Method Prospective, single-centre, observational 2 year study conducted in IBD adult patients with stable disease treated with the originator infliximab who were switched to CT-P13. Four time points were defined for follow-up: prior to the switch, 4–8 weeks after the switch, 8 months later, and 2 years later. Outcome measures were the proportion of patients with clinical, endoscopic and biochemical remission, and changes in biochemical inflammation markers (albumin, C-reactive protein, faecal calprotectin) and infliximab clearance. Results 42 IBD patients were switched, of which 36 (85.7%) remained on CT-P13 throughout the 2 year study period. Only two patients discontinued CT-P13 due to loss of response. The proportion of patients who displayed clinical, endoscopic and biochemical remission were unchanged during the follow-up (p<0.05) and no statistically significant changes were observed in the biochemical markers of disease activity. The median (IQR) clearance estimated for the infliximab originator before the change was 0.364 (0.321–0.415) L/day, and for the CT-P13 biosimilar it was 0.361 (0.323–0.415) L/day 4–8 weeks after the change, and 0.370 (0.334–0.419) L/day 2 years after (p=0.395). Conclusion Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 did not affect the long-term clinical outcomes or the pharmacokinetic behaviour. This information provides the clinician more evidence for the success of switching and supports non-medical switching in adult IBD patients.