To identify predictors and consequences of violence or aggression events against nurses and nursing students in different work contexts. Workplace violence against nurses and nursing students is a very common and widespread phenomenon. Actions to manage or prevent violent events could be implemented knowing the risk factors and consequences. However, there is a lack of systematic reviews that summarize knowledge on the predictors and consequences of workplace violence. A scoping review was conducted using electronic databases including APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, PubMed and Scopus. After full text analysis, 87 papers were included in the current scoping review. Risk factors of horizontal violence were grouped into ‘personal’ and ‘Environmental and organizational’, and for violence perpetrated by patients into ‘personal’, ‘Environmental and organizational’ and ‘Characteristics of the perpetrators’. The results of this scoping review uncover problems that often remain unaddressed, especially where these episodes are very frequent. Workplace violence prevention and management programmes are essential to counter it. The predictors and the consequents identified constitute the body of knowledge necessary for nurse managers to develop and implement policy and system actions to effectively manage or prevent violent events.

Aim: To report an analysis of the concept of fundamental care in the literature.Design: An evolutionary concept analysis.Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL Complete databases were consulted using the key terms: fundamental care, fundamentals of care, essential care, basic nursing care and basic care revised. Articles published from 2008 to 2022, in English and Italian, in scholarly/peer‐reviewed nursing journals were included.Methods: Rodgers's Evolutionary Method of concept analysis was used. Our thematic analysis yielded common themes related to the concept, antecedents, attributes and consequences of fundamental care.Results: A total of 50 articles were analysed. Thirty‐eight attributes were identified, such as integration of care, patient and family centred care and trusting relationship; eight antecedents including nursing care, nursing practice and care context; and 17 consequences including the safety, quality and consistency of care.Conclusion: This review of literature reveals that there is no consistent definition of the concept of ‘fundamental care’. Findings from this exploration of the literature emphasized the importance of communication, the contextual environment, leadership influence and nurse–patient relationship in providing effective and high‐quality fundamental care. Our definition of this concept may help nurse leaders in practice, research, education, management and policy to promote and enhance the application of fundamental care.Impact: What problem did the study address? While numerous studies examine fundamental nursing care, various terms are used with no consensus on definitions emerging. Given the relevance of this topic, reaching a clear and agreed definition of fundamental care is essential. What were the main findings? Fundamental care encompasses the importance of communication, the contextual environment, leadership influence and nurse‐patient relationship in providing effective and high‐quality care. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This definition of fundamental care will assist nurse leaders and researchers to promote and enhance the examination and application of fundamental care in clinical practice to ensure better care outcomes across all healthcare settings.

Background/Objectives: Adaptation to extrauterine life is challenging for preterm newborns. Environmental stimuli, such as noise, can lead to adverse health outcomes, causing instability of vital parameters and impairment of neurodevelopment. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a maximum environmental noise level of 45 decibels (dB) or less in the NICU. The study’s primary aim was to describe environmental noise in a neonatal intensive care unit and to analyze potential associations between noise and vital parameters of preterm newborns, including heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation levels. Methods: A pilot observational feasibility study was conducted in a level III NICU. Sound levels and vital parameters were recorded over four hours for each preterm newborn. Confounding variables were controlled. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kendall’s τ-b, and logistic regression analysis. Ethical approval and parental consent were obtained. Results: The average environmental noise level was consistently above 45 dB. Six patients were enrolled, and 22 recordings (ranging in length from 1 to 4 h) were performed. Data adjusted for confounding variables show a statistically significant Kendall’s correlation between heart rate and decibels (τ-b = 0.89, p = 0.003, n = 520), suggesting a monotonous crescent tendency between these two variables, although the relationship is not strong. The logistic regression model indicates that the odds ratio (OR) for decibels related to tachycardia is 1.066, meaning that for each 1 dB increase, the probability of tachycardia rises by 6.6% (p < 0.001). Conversely, the OR for respiratory rate is 0.959, suggesting that for each unit increase in respiratory rate, the probability of tachycardia decreases by approximately 4.1% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The study reveals that the mean environmental noise level in the NICU consistently exceeds the recommended safety level. Decibels are one of the significant variables contributing to the likelihood of tachycardia, and an increase in decibels has a significant effect on this, but it is not the only one. Further analysis of a larger sample is needed.

Background: To meet the population's needs, community care should be customized and continuous, adequately equipped, and monitored.Introduction: Considering their fragmented and heterogeneous nature, a summary of community healthcare services described in European literature is needed. The aim of this study was to summarize their organizational models, outcomes, nursing contribution to care, and nursing‐related determinants of outcomes.Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase in October 2022 and October 2023 (for updated results). Quantitative studies investigating the effects of community care, including nursing contribution, on patient outcomes were included and summarized. Reporting followed the PRISMA checklist. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022383856).Results: Twenty‐three studies describing six types of community care services were included, which are heterogeneous in terms of target population, country, interventions, organizational characteristics, and investigated outcomes. Heterogeneous services’ effects were observed for access to emergency services, satisfaction, and compliance with treatment. Services revealed a potential to reduce rehospitalizations of people with long‐term conditions, frail or older persons, children, and heart failure patients. Models are mainly multidisciplinary and, although staffing and workload may also have an impact on provided care, this was not enough investigated.Discussion: Community health services described in European literature in the last decade are in line with population needs and suggest different suitable models and settings according to different care needs. Community care should be strengthened in health systems, although the influence of staffing, workload, and work environment on nursing care should be investigated by developing new management models.Conclusions and implications for health policy: Community care models are heterogeneous across Europe, and the optimum organizational structure is not clear yet. Future policies should consider the impact of community care on both health and economic outcomes and enhance nursing contributions to care.