Christos Zabaftis

Dr. Christos Zabaftis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

22 February 2024 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNikolaos Kalampokis
Nikolaos Kalampokis
CZChristos Zabaftis
Christos Zabaftis
TSTheodoros Spinos
Theodoros Spinos
MKMarkos Karavitakis
Markos Karavitakis
ILIoannis Leotsakos
Ioannis Leotsakos
DMDionysios Mitropoulos
Dionysios Mitropoulos
(1) Background: Somatic and germline alterations can be commonly found in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The aim of our present study was to perform a comprehensive review of the current literature in order to examine the impact of BRCA mutations in the context of PCa as well as their significance as genetic biomarkers. (2) Methods: A narrative review of all the available literature was performed. Only “landmark” publications were included. (3) Results: Overall, the number of PCa patients who harbor a BRCA2 mutation range between 1.2% and 3.2%. However, BRCA2 and BRCA1 mutations are responsible for most cases of hereditary PCa, increasing the risk by 3–8.6 times and up to 4 times, respectively. These mutations are correlated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. Gene testing should be offered to patients with metastatic PCa, those with 2–3 first-degree relatives with PCa, or those aged < 55 and with one close relative with breast (age ≤ 50 years) or invasive ovarian cancer. (4) Conclusions: The individualized assessment of BRCA mutations is an important tool for the risk stratification of PCa patients. It is also a population screening tool which can guide our risk assessment strategies and achieve better results for our patients and their families.

23 May 2025 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMarkos Karavitakis
Markos Karavitakis
NGNikolaos Grivas
Nikolaos Grivas
CZChristos Zabaftis
Christos Zabaftis
FNFILIPPOS NIKITAKIS
FILIPPOS NIKITAKIS
STSmaragda Tsela
Smaragda Tsela
DMDionysios Mitropoulos
Dionysios Mitropoulos
Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), offering cancer control with renal preservation. Three-dimensional laparoscopy addresses the limitations of traditional two-dimensional systems by enhancing depth perception and accuracy. This study evaluates the impact of 3D laparoscopy on PN for larger and complex tumors. We retrospectively analyzed 200 laparoscopic nephrectomies by a single surgeon between 2020 and 2024, comparing pre-3D and post-3D groups (100 cases each). Key outcomes included the rate of PN, warm ischemia time (WIT), and operative time. The post-3D group demonstrated a significant increase in PN for tumors >4 cm (48% vs. 35%, p = 0.028) and high RENAL scores ≥8 (41% vs. 29%, p = 0.035). Median WIT was significantly shorter (24 min vs. 29 min, p = 0.018 for larger tumors; 26 min vs. 32 min, p = 0.022 for high complexity). Total operative time was also reduced (175 min vs. 195 min, p = 0.031). Positive surgical margins were lower in the post-3D group (0% vs. 2%), and complication rates were comparable (5% vs. 4%, p = 0.712). Three-dimensional laparoscopy significantly improves the feasibility and precision of PN for larger and complex tumors, enhancing outcomes without increasing complications.

5 February 2026 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CZChristos Zabaftis
Christos Zabaftis
FNFILIPPOS NIKITAKIS
FILIPPOS NIKITAKIS
NGNikolaos Grivas
Nikolaos Grivas
ABAthanasios Bouchalakis
Athanasios Bouchalakis
MCMaria Chalkidou
Maria Chalkidou
MKMarkos Karavitakis
Markos Karavitakis
Background and Objectives: Vaginal vault prolapse is a known complication following anterior pelvic exenteration in women undergoing radical cystectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of a novel anatomical approach for preventing vaginal vault prolapse after radical cystectomy. This study introduces a standardized laparoscopic technique that utilizes round ligament preservation and fixation to provide anatomical support to the vaginal apex. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single center, including thirteen female patients with uterus and adnexa in situ who underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bilateral round ligament fixation to the vaginal cuff. The round ligaments were mobilized and sutured without tension. Vaginal closure was performed with barbed sutures. Results: No intraoperative complications occurred. At a median follow-up of 18.2 months, no cases of vaginal vault prolapse or dehiscence were observed. One patient experienced transient pelvic discomfort. Conclusions: This is the first report of a standardized mesh-free approach for vaginal apex support during laparoscopic anterior exenteration. The technique is feasible, safe, and may reduce postoperative prolapse risk.