ADINA DUMITRU

Dr. ADINA DUMITRU

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2019 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FAFlor Avelino
Flor Avelino
JWJulia M. Wittmayer
Julia M. Wittmayer
BPBonno Pel
Bonno Pel
PWPaul Weaver
Paul Weaver
ADADINA DUMITRU
ADINA DUMITRU
TOTim O'Riordan
Tim O'Riordan
This article responds to increasing public and academic discourses on social innovation, which often rest on the assumption that social innovation can drive societal change and empower actors to deal with societal challenges and a retreating welfare state. In order to scrutinise this assumption, this article proposes a set of concepts to study the dynamics of transformative social innovation and underlying processes of multi-actor (dis)empowerment. First, the concept of transformative social innovation is unpacked by proposing four foundational concepts to help distinguish between different pertinent ‘shades’ of change and innovation: 1) social innovation, (2) system innovation, (3) game-changers, and (4) narratives of change. These concepts, invoking insights from transitions studies and social innovations literature, are used to construct a conceptual account of how transformative social innovation emerges as a co-evolutionary interaction between diverse shades of change and innovation. Second, the paper critically discusses the dialectic nature of multi-actor (dis)empowerment that underlies such processes of change and innovation. The paper then demonstrates how the conceptualisations are applied to three empirical case-studies of transformative social innovation: Impact Hub, Time Banks and Credit Unions. In the conclusion we synthesise how the concepts and the empirical examples help to understand contemporary shifts in societal power relations and the changing role of the welfare state

29 May 2019 in BioScience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NFNiki Frantzeskaki
Niki Frantzeskaki
TMTimon McPhearson
Timon McPhearson
DJDEIRDRE JOYCE
DEIRDRE JOYCE
DKDave Kendal
Dave Kendal
HBHarriet Bulkeley
Harriet Bulkeley
LPLászló Pintér
László Pintér

1 October 2016 in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NFNiki Frantzeskaki
Niki Frantzeskaki
ADADINA DUMITRU
ADINA DUMITRU
IAIsabelle Anguelovski
Isabelle Anguelovski
FAFlor Avelino
Flor Avelino
MBMatthew Bach
Matthew Bach
FRFelix Rauschmayer
Felix Rauschmayer

1 July 2016 in Energy Research & Social Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ARAngela Ruepert
Angela Ruepert
KKKees Keizer
Kees Keizer
LSLinda Steg
Linda Steg
Fridanna MaricchioloFridanna Maricchiolo
Fridanna Maricchiolo
GCGiuseppe Carrus
Giuseppe Carrus
DMDaniela Moza
Daniela Moza
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour at work can result in a significant reduction in environmental problems. Research revealed that general environmental considerations such as biospheric values and environmental self-identity are important antecedents of private pro-environmental behaviour. Yet, the question remains whether such general environmental considerations also predict pro-environmental behaviour at work. We propose a parsimonious theoretical model (the VIP-model) in which biospheric values affect personal norms to behave pro-environmentally at work and pro-environmental actions via the environmental self-identity. A study involving a diverse sample of employees from different European organizations supported the VIP-model, showing that biospheric values and environmental self-identity influence personal norms, and that stronger personal norms encouraged various self-reported pro-environmental behaviours at work to some extent. The VIP-model yields promising, cost-efficient strategies to encourage pro-environmental behaviour at work

1 October 2020 in Environmental Science & Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADADINA DUMITRU
ADINA DUMITRU
NFNiki Frantzeskaki
Niki Frantzeskaki
DJDEIRDRE JOYCE
DEIRDRE JOYCE

22 February 2019 in European Planning Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FAFlor Avelino
Flor Avelino
ADADINA DUMITRU
ADINA DUMITRU
CCCarla Cipolla
Carla Cipolla
IKIris Kunze
Iris Kunze
JWJulia Wittmayer
Julia Wittmayer
This paper contributes to public and academic discussions on empowerment and social innovation by conceptualizing the mechanisms of empowerment from a social psychology perspective, and empirically exploring how people are empowered through both local and transnational linkages, i.e. translocal networks. Section 2 conceptualizes empowerment as the process through which actors gain the capacity to mobilize resources to achieve a goal, building on different power theories in relation to social change, combined with self-determination theory and intrinsic motivation research. Based on that conceptualization, empirical questions are formulated to be asked about cases under study. Section 3 then provides an empirical analysis of translocal networks that work with social innovation both at the global and local level. A total of five networks are analyzed: FEBEA, DESIS, the Global Ecovillage Network, Impact Hub and Slow Food. The embedded cases-study approach allows an exploration of how people are empowered through the transnational networking while also zooming in on the dynamics in local initiatives. In the final section, conceptual and empirical insights are synthesized into a characterization of the mechanisms of translocal empowerment, and challenges for future research are formulated.