The aim of this study was to assess the immediate influence of chest tube removal on chest pain and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) after pulmonary resection. Prospective longitudinal investigation on 104 consecutive patients (53 wedge/segmentectomies and 51 lobectomies; 69 muscle and nerve-sparing lateral thoracotomy and 35 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)). Post-operative chest pain was controlled in all patients by a standardized combination of oral and intravenous non-opioid analgesics. All patients had one chest tube (24 French). Static and dynamic (after forced expiratory effort) pain and FEV1 were assessed before and 1 h after the chest tube removal by the same operator. No additional analgesics were administered before or after the chest tube removal. The pain level was assessed by the numeric pain scale [range: 0 (no pain)–10 (excruciating pain)]. FEV1 was assessed by a portable spirometer. Bronchodilators were not used in these patients. Pre- and post-removal measurements were compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The average pre-removal static and dynamic pain scores were 2.6 and 4.1, respectively. The static and dynamic pain scores decreased by 42 and 41%, respectively, after the tube removal (P < 0.0001). The average FEV1 before the chest tube removal was 1.5 l or 53% of the predicted value and increased by 13% after the tube removal (P = 0.0004). In total, 56 and 78% of patients reported static and dynamic pain scores improvement and 67% showed an FEV1 improvement after the chest tube removal. Similar results were observed in patients operated on through VATS or thoracotomy. Compared with patients whose chest tube was removed later, those who had their chest tube removed before post operative day 3 (POD3), showed a greater reduction in the static pain score (41 vs. 31%, P = 0.05) and greater improvement in FEV1 (18 vs. 0.01%, P = 0.02). The removal of a chest tube reduces pain and improves ventilatory function, independent of surgical access and particularly in the early post-operative phase. A fast track chest tube removal policy may favour patients' recovery.

Objective: In pulmonary lobectomy, the dissection through the fissure to gain access to the pulmonary artery may increase the risk of postoperative air leak. For several anatomic reasons, this risk is especially high after right upper lobectomies (RULs). The objective of this investigation was to verify the efficacy of an anterior fissureless lobectomy (FL) technique in reducing the incidence and duration of air leak after RUL. Methods: An observational analysis was performed of 206 consecutive patients (2002–2009) submitted to RUL for non-small-cell lung cancer. Operations were performed through a muscle-sparing lateral thoracotomy. Patients with completely developed fissures were excluded. No sealants or buttressing material were used. For group TR (traditional resection, 146 patients), RUL was performed by traditional intra-fissure dissection of the pulmonary artery; for group FL (60 patients), RUL was carried out by fissureless division of all hilar vascular structures. Several perioperative variables were used in identifying propensity score-matched pairs of patients undergoing traditional and fissureless lobectomies. The matched groups were then compared in terms of incidence of prolonged air leak, air leak duration, operation time, chest tubes duration, hospital stay and costs. Results: Propensity score analysis yielded 58 well-matched pairs of patients operated by traditional or fissureless RUL. Compared to those in the traditional group, patients in group FL had a mean reduction in air leak duration, duration of chest tube and postoperative stay of 1.1, 1.4 and 1.2 days, respectively. This translated into an average hospital cost saving of 569 € per patient. Conclusions: The use of an anterior fissureless technique during RUL reduced the duration of air leak and hospital costs without increasing the surgical time. Given its simplicity and efficacy, we regard it as a useful tool for implementing fast-tracking policies and cutting hospital costs.

Many studies have confirmed that the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols has the advantages of reducing the potential complications after thoracic surgery and the length of hospital stay. The ERAS program involves a multidisciplinary team, aimed at integrating evidence-based knowledge into clinical practice in order to reduce the patient’s stress response to the surgical procedure and improve the response to stress, guaranteeing a combination of better outcomes and cost savings. All this would not be possible without the improvement of minimally invasive surgical techniques, progression of anesthesia, pain control, and careful patient preparation. In this setting, a preoperative personal counselling may play a key role to reduce stress, fear or anxiety and improve the morbidity of patients, enabling them to achieve functional and psychological compensatory mechanisms more quickly. Preoperative patient counselling, performed using verbal, written or multimedia materials, is crucial in order to achieve the goal of the ERAS project: making the patient a potentially active participant and the main character of his recovery, able to positively impact himself throughout the surgical and healing process. This report is aimed at evaluating patient information and care-plans in thoracic surgery, reviewing the available evidence on ERAS pathways, and demonstrating our ideal program as discussed and shared among the Italian Thoracic Surgery Units accredited in the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) group.

Digitalized chest drainage systems allow for quantification of air leak and measurement of intrapleural pressure. Little is known about the value of intrapleural pressure during the postoperative phase and its role in the recovering process after pulmonary resection. The objective of this investigation was to measure the values of pleural pressure immediately before the removal of chest tube after different types of pulmonary lobectomy. Prospective observational analysis on 203 consecutive patients submitted to pulmonary lobectomy during a 12-month period at two centres. Multiple measurements were recorded in the last hour before the removal of chest tube and averaged for the analysis. All patients were seated in bed in a 45° up-right position or in a chair, had a single chest tube and were not connected to suction during the evaluation period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences in pleural pressure between different types of lobectomies. The average maximum, minimum and differential pressures were −6.1, −19.5 and 13.3 cmH₂O, respectively. The average pressures were similar in all types of lobectomies (ANOVA, P = 0.2) and ranged from −11 to −13 cmH₂O, with the exception of right upper bilobectomy (−20 cmH₂O, all P-values vs. other types of lobectomies <0.05). Similar values were also recorded for maximum pressures (range −4.4 to −8.4 cmH₂O) and minimum pressures (−31.6 cmH₂O vs. ranged from −15.4 to −20.5 cmH₂O, all P-values <0.01). The average pleural pressure was not associated with FEV1 (P = 0.9), DLCO (P = 0.2) or FEV1/FVC ratio (P = 0.6), when tested with linear regression. Similarly, the average pleural pressure was similar in patients with and without COPD (−12.1 vs. −13.0 cmH₂O, P = 0.4). The ANOVA test was used to assess differences in pressures between different lobectomies. The so-called water seal status may actually correspond to intrapleural pressures ranging from −13 to −20 cmH₂O. Modern electronic chest drainage devices allow a stable control of the intrapleural pressure. Thus, the values found in this study may be used as target pressures for different types of lobectomies, in order to favour lung recovery after surgery.