Sofia Raponi

Dr. Sofia Raponi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EREnrico Rosa
Enrico Rosa
SRSofia Raponi
Sofia Raponi
BFBruno Fionda
Bruno Fionda
MVMaria Vaccaro
Maria Vaccaro
VLValentina Lancellotta
Valentina Lancellotta
Elisa PlacidiElisa Placidi
Elisa Placidi
Introduction: Interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy, IRT, BT) has evolved with technological advancements, improving dose precision while minimizing exposure to healthy tissues. The integration of 3D-printing technology in IRT has enabled the development of patient-specific devices, optimizing treatment personalization and dosimetric accuracy. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify studies published between 2020 and 2024 on 3D-printing applications in IRT. The selection process resulted in 74 peer-reviewed articles categorized by radioactive source, brachytherapy technique, endpoint of the 3D-printed product, and study type. Results: The analysis highlights the growing implementation of 3D-printed devices in brachytherapy, particularly in gynecological, prostate, and skin cancers. Most studies focus on technique, including intracavitary, interstitial, and contact applications, with custom applicators and templates emerging as predominant endpoints. The majority of studies involved in vivo clinical applications, followed by in silico computational modeling and in vitro experiments. Conclusions: The upward trend in scientific publications underscores the growing attention on 3D printing for enhancing personalized brachytherapy. The increasing use of 3D-printed templates and applicators highlights their role in optimizing dose delivery and expanding personalized treatment strategies. The current research trend is shifting toward real-world data and in vivo studies to assess clinical applications, ensuring these innovations translate effectively into routine practice. The integration of 3D printing represents a major advancement in radiation oncology, with the potential to enhance treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on standardizing manufacturing processes and expanding clinical validation to facilitate broader adoption.

30 September 2025 in Journal of Personalized Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EREnrico Rosa
Enrico Rosa
SRSofia Raponi
Sofia Raponi
BFBruno Fionda
Bruno Fionda
MVMaria Vaccaro
Maria Vaccaro
Antonio NapolitanoAntonio Napolitano
Antonio Napolitano
Elisa PlacidiElisa Placidi
Elisa Placidi
Background/Objectives: This study investigates the dosimetric impact of a 3D-printed applicator integrating multilayer catheter geometry and high-density shielding, designed for contact interventional radiotherapy (IRT) in non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatment. The aim is to assess its potential to enhance target coverage and reduce doses in organs at risk (OARs). Methods: A virtual prototype of a multilayer applicator was designed using 3D modeling software and realized through fused deposition modeling. Dosimetric simulations were performed using both TG-43 and TG-186 formalisms on CT scans of a water-equivalent phantom. A five-catheter array was reconstructed, and lead-cadmium-based alloy shielding of varying thicknesses (3–15 mm) was contoured. CTVs of 5 mm and 8 mm thickness were analyzed along with a neighboring OAR. Dosimetric endpoints included V95%, V100%, V150% (CTV), D2cc (OAR), and therapeutic window (TW). Results: Compared to TG-43, the TG-186 algorithm yielded lower OAR doses while maintaining comparable CTV coverage. Progressive increase in shielding thickness led to improved V95% and V100% values and a notable reduction in OAR dose, with an optimal trade-off observed between 6 and 9 mm of shielding. The TW remained above 7 mm across all configurations, supporting its use in lesions thicker than conventional guidelines recommend. Conclusions: The integration of multilayer catheter geometry with high-density shielding in a customizable 3D-printed applicator enables enhanced dose modulation and OAR sparing in superficial IRT. This approach represents a step toward personalized brachytherapy, aligning with the broader movement in radiation oncology toward patient-specific solutions, adaptive planning, and precision medicine. Future directions should include prototyping and mechanical testing of the applicator, experimental dosimetric validation in phantoms, and pilot clinical feasibility studies to translate these promising in silico results into clinical practice.