Aniefiok John Udoakang

Dr. Aniefiok John Udoakang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 January 2023 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AUAniefiok John Udoakang
Aniefiok John Udoakang
AZAlexandra Lindsey Djomkam Zune
Alexandra Lindsey Djomkam Zune
KTKesego Tapela
Kesego Tapela
NNNora Nghochuzie Nganyewo
Nora Nghochuzie Nganyewo
FOFrances Ngozi Olisaka
Frances Ngozi Olisaka
PQPeter Kojo Quashie
Peter Kojo Quashie
In December 2019, a novel pneumonic condition, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), broke out in China and spread globally. The presentation of COVID-19 is more severe in persons with underlying medical conditions such as Tuberculosis (TB), Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and other pneumonic conditions. All three diseases are of global concern and can significantly affect the lungs with characteristic cytokine storm, immunosuppression, and respiratory failure. Co-infections of SARS-CoV-2 with HIV and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) have been reported, which may influence their pathogenesis and disease progression. Pulmonary TB and HIV/AIDS patients could be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to lethal synergy and disease severity. Therefore, the biological and epidemiological interactions of COVID-19, HIV/AIDS, and TB need to be understood holistically. While data is needed to predict the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these existing diseases, it is necessary to review the implications of the evolving COVID-19 management on HIV/AIDS and TB control, including therapy and funding. Also, the impact of long COVID on patients, who may have this co-infection. Thus, this review highlights the implications of COVID-19, HIV/AIDS, and TB co-infection compares disease mechanisms, addresses growing concerns, and suggests a direction for improved diagnosis and general management.

6 July 2021 in Wellcome Open Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PQPeter Kojo Quashie
Peter Kojo Quashie
JMJoe Kimanthi Mutungi
Joe Kimanthi Mutungi
FDFrancis Dzabeng
Francis Dzabeng
DODaniel Oduro-Mensah
Daniel Oduro-Mensah
POPrecious C. Opurum
Precious C. Opurum
GAGordon A. Awandare
Gordon A. Awandare
Background : We set out to estimate the community-level exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Ghana. Methods : Phased seroprevalence studies of 2729 participants at selected locations across Ghana were conducted. Phase I (August 2020) sampled 1305 individuals at major markets/lorry stations, shopping malls, hospitals and research institutions involved in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) work. The study utilized a lateral flow rapid diagnostic test (RDT) which detected IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. Results : During Phase I, 252/1305 (19%) tested positive for IgM or IgG or both. Exposure was significantly higher at markets/lorry stations (26.9%) compared to malls (9.4%), with 41–60-year group demonstrating highest seropositivity (27.2%). Exposure was higher in participants with no formal education (26.2%) than those with tertiary education (13.1%); and higher in informally employed workers (24.0%) than those in the formal sector (15.0%). Results from phases II and III, in October and December 2020 respectively, implied either reduced transmissions or loss of antibody expression in some participants. The Upper East region showed the lowest seropositivity (2%). Phase IV, in February 2021, showed doubled seropositivity in the upper income bracket (26.2%) since August 2020, reflective of Ghana’s second wave of symptomatic COVID-19 cases. This suggested that high transmission rates had overcome the initial socioeconomic stratification of exposure risk. Reflective of second wave hospitalisation trends, the 21-40 age group demonstrated modal seropositivity (24.9) in Phase IV whilst 40-60 years and 60+ previously demonstrated highest prevalence. Conclusions : Overall, the data indicates higher COVID-19 seroprevalence than officially acknowledged, likely implying a considerably lower-case fatality rate than the current national figure of 0.84%. The data also suggests that COVID-19 is predominantly asymptomatic COVID-19 in Ghana. The observed trends mimic clinical trends of infection and imply that the methodology used was appropriate.

7 October 2021 in Open Research Africa
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AUAniefiok John Udoakang
Aniefiok John Udoakang
MOMary A Oboh
Mary A Oboh
AHAgatha Henry-Ajala
Agatha Henry-Ajala
CAClaudia Anyigba
Claudia Anyigba
SOSemeeh Omoleke
Semeeh Omoleke
PQPeter Kojo Quashie
Peter Kojo Quashie
Africa has defied predictions of being the worst hit by the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which has devastated Europe, the Americas, and some Asian countries. However, with a current second and third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic across other continents, pertinent​ questions have arisen regarding the lower disease severity and seemingly better outcomes in most African countries. Several factors have been proposed as discussed in this review including, underreporting, quick lockdown measures, effective public health intervention, younger population structure, cross-immunity and experience from fighting previous epidemics, such as the Ebola virus outbreak, previous infections or vaccinations, genetic predisposition, and tropical climate. We have discussed the implications of these factors on the magnitude of the outbreak and the better-than-expected outcomes observed in Africa. In addition, other potential factors like vitamin-D deficiency and chronic non-communicable diseases could predispose non-African regions to severe COVID-19 outcome. Therefore, this review further advocates for research to understand the precise mechanisms responsible for the pandemic’s relatively mild impact in Africa and proposed recommendations to prevent an infection surge.

5 March 2022 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AUAniefiok John Udoakang
Aniefiok John Udoakang
AZAlexandra Lindsey Djomkam Zune
Alexandra Lindsey Djomkam Zune
KTKesego Tapela
Kesego Tapela
OOOloche Owoicho
Oloche Owoicho
IFIfeoluwa Kayode Fagbohun
Ifeoluwa Kayode Fagbohun
LALucas N Amenga-Etego
Lucas N Amenga-Etego
Background: The first case of the novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in West Africa was first confirmed in Nigeria in February 2020. Since then, several public health interventions and preventive measures have been implemented to curtail transmission of the causative agent, the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Therefore, this study was performed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of West Africans towards COVID-19. Methods: An online survey was conducted between 29 September to 29 October 2020 among West Africans. Thirty-three survey questions were designed to collect sociodemographic data and participants’ knowledge, attitude and perception towards COVID-19. The study targeted all West African nationals who were 18 years and above, and willing to participate in the study. Participants were either in-country or abroad. Results: Overall, 1106 respondents (≥18 years) from 16 West African countries, with about 12.1% of them residing outside the West African subregion, participated in the survey. The respondents had an average COVID-19 knowledge score of 67.82 ± 8.31, with knowledge of the disease significantly associated with the country of residence (p = 0.00) and marginally (p = 0.05) so with settlement types (i.e., urban, suburban and rural areas). Most respondents (93.4%) could identify the main COVID-19 symptoms, and 73.20% would consult a healthcare professional if infected with SARS-CoV-2. Also, 75.2% of the respondents are willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, whereas 10.40% and 14.40% are unwilling and undecided, respectively. Perceptions of what constitute COVID-19 preventive measures were highly variable. Approximately, 8% of the respondents felt that their government responded excellently in managing the pandemic while a third felt that the response was just good. Also, more than half (54%) opined that isolation and treatment of COVID-19 patients is a way of curbing SARS-CoV-2 spread. Conclusions: Most West Africans have basic knowledge of COVID-19 and showed a positive attitude, with likely proactive practice towards the disease. However, results showed that these varied across countries and are influenced by the types of settlements. Therefore, the health and education authorities in various countries should develop focused measures capturing people in different settlements to improve their preventative measures when designing public health interventions for COVID-19 and any future epidemics or pandemics.

15 January 2026 in Wellcome Open Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PQPeter Kojo Quashie
Peter Kojo Quashie
JMJoe Kimanthi Mutungi
Joe Kimanthi Mutungi
FDFrancis Dzabeng
Francis Dzabeng
DODaniel Oduro-Mensah
Daniel Oduro-Mensah
POPrecious C. Opurum
Precious C. Opurum
GAGordon A. Awandare
Gordon A. Awandare
Background We set out to estimate the community-level exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Ghana. Methods Phased seroprevalence studies of 2729 participants at selected locations across Ghana were conducted. Phase I (August 2020) sampled 1305 individuals at major markets/lorry stations, shopping malls, hospitals and research institutions involved in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) work. The study utilized a lateral flow rapid diagnostic test (RDT) which detected IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. Results During Phase I, 252/1305 (19%) tested positive for IgM or IgG or both. Exposure was significantly higher at markets/lorry stations (26.9%) compared to malls (9.4%), with 41–60-year group demonstrating highest seropositivity (27.2%). Exposure was higher in participants with no formal education (26.2%) than those with tertiary education (13.1%); and higher in informally employed workers (24.0%) than those in the formal sector (15.0%). Results from phases II and III, in October and December 2020 respectively, implied either reduced transmissions or loss of antibody expression in some participants. The Upper East region showed the lowest seropositivity (2%). Phase IV, in February 2021, showed doubled seropositivity in the upper income bracket (26.2%) since August 2020, reflective of Ghana’s second wave of symptomatic COVID-19 cases. This suggested that high transmission rates had overcome the initial socioeconomic stratification of exposure risk. Reflective of second wave hospitalisation trends, the 21–40 age group demonstrated modal seropositivity (24.9) in Phase IV whilst 40–60 years and 60+ previously demonstrated highest prevalence. Conclusions Overall, the data indicates higher COVID-19 seroprevalence than officially acknowledged, likely implying a considerably lower-case fatality rate than the current national figure of 0.84%. The data also suggests that COVID-19 is predominantly asymptomatic COVID-19 in Ghana. The observed trends mimic clinical trends of infection and imply that the methodology used was appropriate.

29 October 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CAClaudia Adzo Anyigba
Claudia Adzo Anyigba
VAVictor Ayinbora Azusiyine
Victor Ayinbora Azusiyine
CSCourage Siame
Courage Siame
AUAniefiok John Udoakang
Aniefiok John Udoakang
ELEmmanuel Lante Lamptey
Emmanuel Lante Lamptey
LPLily Paemka
Lily Paemka
Background/Objectives: Breast cancer incidence is increasing in younger Ghanaian women. However, few epidemiological studies have evaluated the modifiable risk factors in this population. Additionally, these studies have classified breast cancer in Ghanaian women based on the global menopausal case classification. This study reclassified premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer in a Ghanaian cohort, assessing the risk factors using the observed menopausal age in Ghanaian women of 48 years, rather than the global standard of 50 years. Methods: Women diagnosed with breast cancer and scheduled for surgery from December 2018 to March 2023 were recruited across four hospitals in Ghana for the Ghana Breast Cancer Omics Project (BCOPGh), and data were collected using a questionnaire. Cross-tabulation and linear regression were used to evaluate the relationships between categorical variables and age at diagnosis. Results: Out of a total of 262 women recruited, 34.4% were classified as having premenopausal breast cancer, while early-onset breast cancer (EOBC) accounted for 14.9% of all cases. The molecular subtypes were predominantly hormone receptor (HR)-positive (61%) while triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounted for 16%. The tumours were predominantly at stage II (62%) and grade 2 (51%), with invasive carcinoma NST (56%) being the most common subtype. Within this cohort, nulliparity increased the odds of EOBC by 13.5-fold, while having a first birth after the age of 23 doubled the odds of premenopausal breast cancer. Reproductive factors (menarche and menopause) and lifestyle (alcohol intake, smoking, contraceptive use, and breastfeeding duration) were not associated with premenopausal breast cancer in this cohort. About 13% of participants reported a family history of breast cancer, and 79% had prior knowledge of the disease. Conclusion: This study supports previous reports of the relatively higher incidence of aggressive disease in young Ghanaian women and the protective effect of early age at first birth. It further underscores the need to investigate its genetic underpinnings, whilst highlighting the importance of public education on self-examination techniques to reduce advanced disease presentation in Ghanaian women.