Background: The purpose of this study was to compare home and office BP in the adjustment of antihypertensive treatment. Methods: This study was an open, prospective, noninterventional, multicenter clinical trial that occurred between July 2019 and February 2020, in 34 cities in the territory of the Republic of Serbia, which monitored 1581 participants for 6 months. Depending on the used blood pressure monitoring method used, all patients were divided into control (office BP monitoring) and experimental (home BP telemonitoring) groups. We collected anamnestic data and data about systolic blood pressure (SP), in mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DP), in mmHg, and heart rate (HR), in beats/minute, from all patients. Results: SP values were significantly different at baseline, and at the second, third, and fourth visits between the two tested groups. Home and office BP decreased significantly (p < 0.000) during the 6-month follow-up. We observed a statistically significant influence of the presence of diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia on the dynamics of differences between SP monitoring values. Conclusions: Our study suggests that novel technologies in BP monitoring can be excellent alternatives for BP assessment in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes and dyslipidemia.
Background and Objectives: Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias commonly occur in patients without structural heart disease and most often present as premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Although generally considered benign, a high PVC burden may cause symptoms, reduce quality of life, and lead to reversible PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation of idiopathic outflow tract PVCs. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 101 patients with idiopathic PVCs who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. PVC burden and clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline and during follow-up at 3 months, 12 months, and 5 years. Procedural success, predictors of success, and changes in antiarrhythmic drug therapy were analyzed. Results: During follow-up, a marked reduction in PVC burden was observed compared with baseline values. The median PVC burden decreased from 21.89% at baseline to 0.79% at 3 months, 0.23% at 12 months, and 0.09% at the 5-year follow-up after ablation. Acute procedural success was achieved in 88.1% of patients. Long-term success at 5 years was observed in 80.2% of patients. The use of antiarrhythmic drugs decreased during follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable, with no significant difference between baseline and 5-year values. Monomorphic PVC morphology and procedural success at 12 months were identified as independent predictors of long-term success. Conclusions: Radiofrequency catheter ablation provides effective and sustained reduction in PVC burden in patients with idiopathic outflow tract PVCs, with high acute success rates, durable long-term outcomes, and reduced reliance on antiarrhythmic drug therapy.