Specialty barley malts provide unique aroma characteristics to beer; however, the transfer of specialty malt odorants to beer has not yet been systematically studied. Therefore, three beers were brewed: (1) exclusively with kilned base barley malt, (2) with the addition of a caramel barley malt, and (3) with the addition of a roasted barley malt. Major odorants in the beers were identified by aroma extract dilution analysis followed by quantitation and calculation of odor activity values (OAVs). The caramel malt beer was characterized by outstandingly high OAVs for odorants such as (E)-β-damascenone, 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, methionol, 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazine, and 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethylfuran-3(2H)-one, whereas the highest OAV for 2-methoxyphenol was obtained in the roasted malt beer. Quantifying odorants in the malts revealed that the direct transfer from malt to beer played only a minor role in the amount of malt odorants in the beers, suggesting a substantial formation from precursors and/or a release of encapsulated odorants during brewing.

Application of gas chromatography–olfactometry and aroma extract dilution analysis to the volatiles isolated from (1) crust and (2) crumb of a wheat bread made with the addition of a dark liquid malt extract (LME) to the dough and (3) crust and (4) crumb of a reference bread made without addition resulted in the identification of 23 major odorants. Their quantitation followed by the calculation of odor activity values (OAV = ratio of concentration to odor threshold value) suggested that LME addition influenced the aroma of the bread predominantly by increasing seasoning-like smelling sotolon in crust and crumb, and caramel-like smelling compounds maltol and 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethylfuran-3(2H)-one (HDMF) in the crumb. The increase in sotolon and maltol was explainable by direct transfer from the LME to the bread, whereas HDMF must have been formed from LME-derived precursors. This difference needs to be considered in the targeted optimization of LMEs for bread making.

Consumers' interest in healthy and sustainable food of superior organoleptic quality has contributed to an increased market of mildly processed chilled NFC orange juices, preserved by methods such as high pressure processing (HPP) and pulsed electric fields (PEF). To protect consumers from food fraud, analytical methods to differentiate such juices from thermally pasteurized juices are required. To screen for appropriate candidate markers, we applied a complementary non-targeted volatilomics and sensomics approach resulting in a total of 58 candidate markers, among which 20 were quantitated and nine were statistically confirmed. Extension of the quantitations to stored and doubly-treated juices finally resulted in (S)-carvone and vanillin as promising candidate markers. In combination, the two compounds allowed to distinguish the HPP-treated juice from thermally treated juices and even was able to identify an HPP-treated juice that had received an additional thermal pasteurization.