emeline brule

Dr. emeline brule

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 May 2016
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
EBemeline brule
emeline brule
GBGilles Bailly
Gilles Bailly
ABAnke Brock
Anke Brock
FVFrederic Valentin
Frederic Valentin
GDGrégoire Denis
Grégoire Denis
CJChristophe Jouffrais
Christophe Jouffrais
We report on the design process leading to the creation of MapSense, a multi-sensory interactive map for visually impaired children. We conducted a formative study in a specialized institute to understand children's educational needs, their context of care and their preferences regarding interactive technologies. The findings (1) outline the needs for tools and methods to help children to acquire spatial skills and (2) provide four design guidelines for educational assistive technologies. Based on these findings and an iterative process, we designed and deployed MapSense in the institute during two days. It enables collaborations between children with a broad range of impairments, proposes reflective and ludic scenarios and allows caretakers to customize it as they wish. A field experiment reveals that both children and caretakers considered the system successful and empowering.

2 May 2019
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
KSKatta Spiel
Katta Spiel
OKOs Keyes
Os Keyes
AWAshley Marie Walker
Ashley Marie Walker
MDMichael Ann DeVito
Michael Ann DeVito
JBJeremy Birnholtz
Jeremy Birnholtz
GKGopinaath Kannabiran
Gopinaath Kannabiran


2 January 2020 in CoDesign
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KSKatta Spiel
Katta Spiel
EBemeline brule
emeline brule
CFChristopher Frauenberger
Christopher Frauenberger
GBGilles Bailley
Gilles Bailley
GFGeraldine Fitzpatrick
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
Engaging marginalised children, such as disabled children, in Participatory Design (PD) entails particular challenges. The processes can effect social changes by decidedly attending to their lived experience as expertise. However, involving marginalised children in research also requires maintaining a delicate balance between ensuring their right to participation as well as their protection from harm. The resulting tensions are politically charged, affected by myriads of power differences and create moral dilemmas. We present seven case studies, drawing from two participatory design research projects. They illustrate the in-situ judgements taken to address specific dilemmas and provide nuanced insights into the trade-offs required by child-led participatory design processes. Subsequently, we identify three challenges: positioning our work to the children’s carers’ values, protecting ourselves, and enabling the (relative) risk-taking associated with participation for children. We call for this micro-ethical approach to be used when reporting research ethics in practice, and as a guidance for the training of researchers and practitioners.

20 April 2018
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
OMOussama Metatla
Oussama Metatla
Marcos SerranoMarcos Serrano
Marcos Serrano
CJChristophe Jouffrais
Christophe Jouffrais
ATAnja Thieme
Anja Thieme
SKShaun Kane
Shaun Kane
CBCynthia L. Bennett
Cynthia L. Bennett
Technology has become central to many activities of learning, ranging from its use in classroom education to work training, mastering a new hobby, or acquiring new skills of living. While digitally-enhanced learning tools can provide valuable access to information and personalised support, people with specific accessibility needs, such as low or no vision, can often be excluded from their use. This requires technology developers to build more inclusive designs and to offer learning experiences that can be shared by people with mixed-visual abilities. There is also scope to integrate DIY approaches and provide specialised teachers with the ability to design their own low cost educational tools, adapted to pedagogical objectives and to the variety of visual and cognitive abilities of their students. For researchers, this invites new challenges of how to best support technology adoption and its evaluation in often complex educational settings. This workshop seeks to bring together researchers and practitioners interested in accessibility and education to share best practices and lessons learnt for technology in this space; and to jointly discuss and develop future directions for the next generation design of inclusive and effective education technologies.

21 December 2018 in Interactions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OMOussama Metatla
Oussama Metatla
ATAnja Thieme
Anja Thieme
EBemeline brule
emeline brule
CBCynthia Bennett
Cynthia Bennett
Marcos SerranoMarcos Serrano
Marcos Serrano
CJChristophe Jouffrais
Christophe Jouffrais