Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T and T-cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T-cell (TCR-T) therapies have revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies; however, their application to solid tumors remains a formidable challenge. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, antigen heterogeneity, and manufacturing complexity limit the clinical efficacy and scalability of these treatment modalities. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current clinical development strategies for CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies for solid tumors. Herein, we discuss recent breakthroughs and highlight the potential of TCR-T cell therapy. Furthermore, innovative approaches for enhancing CAR-T cell function in solid tumors (e.g., in vivo engineering; induced pluripotent stem cell-derived allogeneic CAR-T cells; armored CAR constructs; dual-antigen targeting; and combination regimens with checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and oncolytic viruses) are explored. We also present trends in global patent activity, revealing a marked acceleration in CAR-T- and TCR-T-related innovations, with the United States and China leading with respect to application volumes. This field is increasingly characterized by multidisciplinary collaborations between academia and industry, driving the development of next-generation platforms, including messenger RNA-based and off-the-shelf cell therapies. Although no CAR-T product has been approved for solid tumors, these findings underscore the accelerating momentum and translational promise of adoptive cell therapies. Addressing the unique biological and logistical challenges of solid tumors is essential for realizing the full potential of these transformative immunotherapies.

Summary: Ocular toxicities arising from anti-cancer drugs occur sporadically and are sometimes underestimated because they are not life-threatening. Reports focusing on ocular toxicities from cancer therapy are limited. We investigated the detailed progress of ocular toxicities of anti-cancer drugs including first-in-class ones. A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for patients who were involved in early phase clinical trials with scheduled ophthalmologic examinations according to their protocols between January 2014 and August 2021. Patients with ocular toxicity suspected to be related to the investigational drugs in the ophthalmic examination were investigated in detail. In total, 37 ocular toxicities related to investigational drugs occurred in 7.6% of patients (33/434). The median age of the 33 patients was 61 years (range, 33–76 years), and 20 were male. Causal drugs with a high incidence of ocular toxicities were HSP90 inhibitors and FGFR inhibitors. Retinopathy was most frequent, while conjunctivitis, dry eye, keratitis, keratopathy, and uveitis were also observed. Dim vision as a subjective finding was a unique adverse event. Most patients developed ocular toxicities even though their dose was below the drug’s maximum tolerated dose. Except for one case, all ocular toxicities occurred bilaterally. About 60% (22/37) of ocular toxicity cases needed a temporary hold of the drug. All except for three cases fully recovered. This study reported the risks and timing of the onset of a variety of ocular toxicities of anti-cancer drugs, which were fundamentally controllable. (Trial registration number. Retrospectively registered)

Cancer remains a formidable global health challenge affecting millions of lives annually. For decades, conventional cancer treatments used a one-size-fits-all approach, overlooking the intricate genetic variations that drive tumors. The emergence of cancer genomics has ushered in a new era of personalized and targeted cancer therapies. The Human Genome Project, which was launched in 1990 and completed in 2003, and the advent of next-generation sequencing technology, which has dramatically increased the efficiency of genome decoding, have dramatically accelerated cancer genomics. Cancer genome sequencing efforts began in 2005, including The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). In 2007, the first whole-human genome sequence, which was generated through next generation sequencing, was published 1. The first clinical application of whole genome sequencing (WGS) for the rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion gene in tongue cancer was reported in 2010 2. By 2030, hundreds of millions of patients with cancer will have had their genomes sequenced.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of simlukafusp alfa (FAP-IL2v), an immunocytokine containing an anti-fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) antibody and an IL2 variant, administered alone or with the PDL1 inhibitor atezolizumab, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: In this phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study, patients received i.v. FAP-IL2v at 10 or 15/20 mg alone or 10 mg when combined with i.v. atezolizumab. The primary objectives were identification of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), recommended dose, and maximum tolerated dose, and evaluation of the safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of FAP-IL2v alone and combined with atezolizumab. Results: All 11 patients experienced adverse events (AE) during FAP-IL2v treatment. Although most AEs were of mild severity, four treatment-related AEs led to study treatment discontinuation in two patients: one with infusion-related reaction, hypotension, and capillary leak syndrome, and the other with increased aspartate aminotransferase. No AE-related deaths occurred. One DLT (grade 3 hypotension) occurred in a patient receiving FAP-IL2v 15/20 mg alone. The recommended dose and maximum tolerated dose could not be determined. The pharmacokinetics of FAP-IL2v remained similar with or without atezolizumab. The study was terminated early as FAP-IL2v development was discontinued because of portfolio prioritization (not for efficacy/safety reasons). Conclusions: This study describes the safety/tolerability of FAP-IL2v 10 mg alone and in combination with atezolizumab in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors; one DLT (hypotension) occurred with FAP-IL2v 15/20 mg. However, dose escalation of FAP-IL2v was not conducted because of early study termination. Significance: This phase I study assessed the safety/tolerability and PK of simlukafusp alfa alone or combined with atezolizumab in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. No notable differences in PK were noted with the combination versus simlukafusp alfa alone; however, high-dose simlukafusp alfa treatment was associated with recombinant IL2-related toxicity, despite the drug's FAP targeting and IL2Rβγ-biased IL2 variant design.

Cancer genome profiling (CGP) occasionally identifies pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in cancer susceptibility genes (CSG) as secondary findings. Here, we analyzed the prevalence and clinical characteristics of PGVs based on nationwide real-world data from CGP tests in Japan. We analyzed the genomic information and clinical characteristics of 23,928 patients with solid cancers who underwent either tumor-only (n = 20,189) or paired tumor-normal (n = 3,739) sequencing CGP tests between June 2019 and December 2021 using the comprehensive national database. We assigned clinical significance for all variants and highlighted the prevalence and characteristics of PGVs. Our primary analysis of the tumor-normal sequencing cohort revealed that 152 patients (4.1%) harbored PGVs in 15 CSGs. Among 783 germline variants, 113 were annotated as PGVs, 70 as benign variants, and 600 as variants of uncertain significance. The number of PGVs identified was highest in BRCA1/2, with 56, followed by TP53, with 18. PGVs were the most prevalent in ovarian and peritoneal cancers, including among cancer types common in Asia. In the tumor-only sequencing cohort, of the 5,184 pathogenic somatic variants across 26 CSGs, 784 (15.1%) were extracted according to the European Society for Medical Oncology recommendations for germline-focused tumor analysis. The prevalence of PGVs was similar to that previously reported in Europe and the United States. This is the largest analysis based on real-world tumor-normal sequencing tests in Asia. The more widespread use of the tumor-normal sequencing CGP test could be reasonable for evaluating PGVs. Significance: We analyzed real-world data from over 23,000 patients in Japan, revealing 4.1% harbored PGVs, particularly in BRCA1/2 and TP53, in CSGs. It highlights the prevalence of PGVs in Asian populations and supports the broader adoption of tumor-normal sequencing CGP tests for PGV evaluation.

Background: Patients with cancer, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy, are at risk from the low immunogenicity of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) vaccines. Methods: This prospective study assessed the seroconversion rate of COVID-19 vaccines among patients with cancer and hospital staff. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein-specific IgG (S-IgG) concentrations were evaluated before the first vaccination, and 1–3 and 4–6 months after the second vaccination. The primary endpoint was the seroconversion rate measured 1–3 months after the second vaccine. Results: In total, 590 patients and 183 healthy hospital staff were analyzed. At 1–3 months after the second vaccination, the S-IgG antibody concentration exceeded the cut-off value (20 BAU/mL) in 96.1% (567/590) of the patients with cancer and 100% (183/183) of the healthy controls (p = 0.0024). At 4–6 months after the second vaccination, the S-IgG antibody concentration exceeded the cut-off value (20 BAU/ml for S-IgG) in 93.1% (461/495) of the patients with cancer and 100% (170/170) of the healthy controls (p < 0.0001). Old age, being male, and low lymphocyte count were related to low SARS-CoV-2 S-IgG levels 1–3 months after the second vaccination among patients, while body mass index, smoking history, and serum albumin level were not. Patients undergoing platinum combination therapy and alkylating agent among cytotoxic drugs, and PARP inhibitor, mTOR inhibitor, and BCR-ABL inhibitor exhibited a low S-IgG antibody concentration compared to the no treatment group. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity was reduced among patients with cancer, especially under several treatment regimens.