Darko M. Anđić

Dr. Darko M. Anđić

Real Estate Administration, Department of State Survey and Mapping, Podgorica, Montenegro
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 July 2021 in Geodesy and Geodynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Darko M. AnđićDarko M. Anđić
Darko M. Anđić
The study presented sampling interval impacts on variance components of the epoch-wise residual errors in relative GPS positioning. In the process of estimates of variance components, the2-way nested ANOVA method was used. For that purpose, GPS observation data during four months at two permanent GPS stations, establishing a 40-km-long baseline as a part of the Montenegrin permanent network (MontePos), were used. The study results showed that there is no statistically significant impact of sampling interval changes on epoch-wise variance components related to the residual tropospheric and ionospheric delays(effect xf061;) when it comes to such a baseline. However, it is not the case with epoch-wise variance components related to the interstation-distance-independent residual ‘far-field’ multipath effect (effect xf062;). It turned out that the absolute values of relative differences of standard deviations of the effectxf061;xf020;on the relative GPS coordinates (e, n and u) had maximum values 11.1%, 10.2% and 8.9%, respectively. Keeping the same order of presentation for the effectxf062;, the values of 5.9%, 9.9% and 12.5% were obtained. In addition, absolute values of relative differences of standard deviations of horizontal and vertical position had maximum values of 3.8% and 7.7%, respectively.

1 January 2023 in Geodetski vestnik
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Darko M. AnđićDarko M. Anđić
Darko M. Anđić
RĐRadovan Mirko Đurović
Radovan Mirko Đurović
This study deals with the use of VIKOR method in finding the optimal solution for a special-purpose geodetic network design. It is about a multi-criteria compromise ranking method developed in 1986. Based on previously defined criteria functions related to precision and reliability, four acceptable alternative solutions were firstly established. Then, with the aim of finding the optimal one, those solutions were subjected to VIKOR method. The geodetic micro-network used in this study was simulated as a trilateration one and consisted of six control points discretizing a structural geometry as well as four, five or six reference points (pillars), depending on what alternative solution it was about. The optimal network design should have ensured the detection of deviations of the control points' positions in accordance with a priori introduced tolerances and constraints. It turned out the approach based on VIKOR method is a very efficient tool in tasks involving multiple conflicting requirements referred to a geodetic engineer and in the cases when the decision must be made in a short term.

1 January 2019 in Geodetski vestnik
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Darko M. AnđićDarko M. Anđić
Darko M. Anđić

1 January 2016 in Geodetski vestnik
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Darko M. AnđićDarko M. Anđić
Darko M. Anđić


31 March 2021 in Geodesy and Cartography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Darko M. AnđićDarko M. Anđić
Darko M. Anđić
In this paper, a new two-stage approach, involving an integral treatement of all quasi-random effects limiting the accuracy of relative GPS positioning and the method of moments to obtain final variance components regarding the effects of short-term (“far-field”) multipath (factor b), joint action of long-term (“near-field”) multipath and receiver antenna phase center offset and variations (factor a1), as well as joint action of tropospheric and ionospheric refraction (factor a2), is presented. In the study, GPS data collected on five baselines were used. Variance components of the quasirandom effects were obtained for the three relative GPS coordinates (e, n and u) using individually monthly datsets including daytime- and those including nighttime-wise ambiguity-fixed baseline solutions. The related results show that statistically significant inequality exists when comparing corresponding variances obtained for daytime and nighttime periods. It turned out that the following standard deviation estimates intervals are present (by the coordinates e, n and u, respectively): (a) daytime period: 3.3–6.9, 4.6–9.0 and 9.1–20.3 mm (factor b); 1.5–4.7, 1.9–7.0 and 3.4–21.9 mm (factor 1a ); 0.0116– 0.3282, 0.0103–0.2365 and 0.1222–0.7818 mm/km (factor a2); (b) nighttime period: 3.2–4.9, 4.7–7.3 and 8.4–15.4 mm (factor b); 0.8–3.8, 2.1–5.0 and 3.1–15.8 mm (factor a1); 0.0118–0.2734, 0.0097–0.2289 and 0.0752–0.6315 mm/km (factor a2).