As tunnel engineering continues to advance toward deeper, longer, and more complex projects, the risks encountered during the construction phase have evolved into a combination of various disaster types and the accumulation of multiple contributing factors. Traditional empirical and semi-empirical risk management methods are increasingly revealing shortcomings in terms of timeliness, accuracy, and the ability to process multi-source data. In recent years, driven by advancements in computing power and sensor technology, artificial intelligence algorithms (AI algorithms) such as machine learning and deep learning have been rapidly adopted in tunnel construction risk management. This paper retrieved relevant literature from the Web of Science database covering the period from 2010 to 2025. After rigorous screening, 96 highly relevant papers were selected for bibliometric analysis. This paper systematically reviews research progress from two perspectives: algorithmic models and engineering applications. The review indicates that, in terms of algorithmic models, traditional machine learning, convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network, generative adversarial network, Transformer, and graph neural network constitute a multi-level technical framework encompassing feature representation, risk perception, and intelligent decision-making. In terms of applications, AI algorithms have been widely integrated into typical scenarios such as geological hazard identification and prediction, surrounding rock stability and deformation prediction, rock burst assessment and early warning, lining defect detection and structural safety assessment, construction-induced ground settlement prediction, and tunnel gas and fire hazard prediction, significantly enhancing risk identification and early warning capabilities. However, several challenges remain, including the scarcity of high-quality datasets, the prevalence of noisy, incomplete, and heterogeneous monitoring data, insufficient coupling between model interpretability and engineering mechanisms, limited cross-project transferability, and the lack of integrated management systems for multi-hazard lifecycle control. Based on this, this paper proposes future research directions in areas such as data infrastructure development, integration of mechanism constraints, and multi-hazard collaborative modeling, aiming to provide guidance for the further development of intelligent risk management in tunnel construction.

Railway cable-stayed bridge construction is characterized by high complexity and substantial safety risk. Deficiencies in safety control may result in serious accidents (e.g., collapse and falls), causing significant casualties and economic losses; therefore, clarifying risk interactions and accident-causing mechanisms is essential. This study proposes a fuzzy DEMATEL–ISM approach in which fuzzy sets capture uncertainty in experts’ linguistic assessments. DEMATEL quantifies influence strengths and causal relationships among factors, and ISM constructs a multi-level hierarchy to explain accident causation. Twenty safety influencing factors are identified and grouped into five categories: management, human, material and equipment, construction technology, and environmental conditions. The obtained accident-causing mechanism comprises seven hierarchical levels: L₁: collapse and fall accidents, L₂: direct factors, L₃–L₅: indirect factors, and L₆–L₇: root factors. This mechanism is a chain of events that leads to an accident, with the nodes improper prestressing, structural deformation and differential settlement. These key nodes can be avoided by reinforcing safety management system implementation, daily supervision and inspection, and education and training on the subject of safety to ensure the safety of railway cable-stayed bridge construction.