Introduction: Early stages of Crohn’s disease [CD] are predominantly inflammatory and early treatment could be useful to change the natural history of CD. We aimed to evaluate the impact of early treatment in our cohort of CD patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of all CD patients at our centre who have received immunomodulators. Time from diagnosis to first CD-related major abdominal surgery or end of follow-up was considered. Dates of diagnosis, of starting immunomodulators (thiopurines / anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF]), and of the first CD-related surgery when appropriate were collected. Results: Of 422 patients who received thiopurines, 189 operated patients started thiopurines after a median of 117 months (interquartile range [IQR] 44–196) since diagnosis; non-operated patients, after a median of 30 months [IQR 6–128], p < 0,005. Odds ratio [OR] for surgery was 1.006 (95% confidence interval [CI]1.004–1008) for each month of delay in starting thiopurines. Among 272 patients who received anti-TNFs, 137 operated patients started anti-TNFs after a median of 166 months [IQR 90–233] since diagnosis; non-operated patients after a median of 59 months [IQR 14–162]; p < 0,005. OR for surgery was 1.008 [95% CI 1.005–1.010] for each month of delay in starting anti-TNFs. Among 467 patients who received thiopurines and/or anti-TNF, 210 operated patients started any immunomodulator after a median of 120 months [IQR 48–197] since diagnosis and non-operated patients after a median of 30 months [IQR 6–126], p < 0,005. OR for surgery was 1.008 [95% CI 1.005–1.010] for each month of delay in starting immunomodulators. Conclusions: In our experience, time between diagnosis and thiopurine or anti-TNF initiation was associated with the risk of major abdominal surgery in Crohn’s disease.

We aim to describe the incidence and source of contagion of COVID-19 in patients with IBD, as well as the risk factors for a severe course and long-term sequelae. This is a prospective observational study of IBD and COVID-19 included in the ENEIDA registry (53,682 from 73 centres) between March–July 2020 followed-up for 12 months. Results were compared with data of the general population (National Centre of Epidemiology and Catalonia). A total of 482 patients with COVID-19 were identified. Twenty-eight percent were infected in the work environment, and 48% were infected by intrafamilial transmission, despite having good adherence to lockdown. Thirty-five percent required hospitalization, 7.9% had severe COVID-19 and 3.7% died. Similar data were reported in the general population (hospitalisation 19.5%, ICU 2.1% and mortality 4.6%). Factors related to death and severe COVID-19 were being aged ≥ 60 years (OR 7.1, 95% CI: 1.8–27 and 4.5, 95% CI: 1.3–15.9), while having ≥2 comorbidities increased mortality (OR 3.9, 95% CI: 1.3–11.6). None of the drugs for IBD were related to severe COVID-19. Immunosuppression was definitively stopped in 1% of patients at 12 months. The prognosis of COVID-19 in IBD, even in immunosuppressed patients, is similar to that in the general population. Thus, there is no need for more strict protection measures in IBD.

Background & aims: Current therapeutic goals in ulcerative colitis (UC) include clinical and endoscopic remission, named mucosal healing (MH). Despite MH, a proportion of patients suffer a clinical relapse, which has been related to histological inflammation. We aimed to identify which histopathological features or histopathological index cut-off was associated with endoscopic relapse (ER) in UC patients with MH. Methods: Retrospective analysis of UC patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy showing complete MH (endoscopic Mayo subscore=0) with random biopsies, and at least one more endoscopy along the follow-up. After a consensus meeting, expert pathologist performed histological assessment according to Simplified Geboes Score (SGS), Nancy Index (NI) and Robarts Histopathological Index (RHI). Other histopathological features were also evaluated. Patients were followed until ER or last endoscopy performed showing persistence of MH. Results: A total of 95 patients (150 colonoscopies) were included. After mean follow-up of 31.2 months (SD 21.7), 33 patients (34.7%) suffered ER. Neutrophils in lamina propria (OR 2.6; P = 0.037), within the epithelium (OR 2.6; P = 0.03), SGS ≥3.1 (OR 2.6; P = 0.037), NI ≥2 (OR 2.6; P = 0.03) and RHI ≥5 (OR 2.6; P = 0.037) were associated with ER in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, eosinophils in the lamina propria (HR 2.5; P = 0.01) and clinical remission<12 months (HR 3.2; P = 0.002) were associated with ER. Conclusions: Histopathological findings in UC patients who have achieved endoscopic MH may predict ER. Standardized histopathology reports according to the presence of neutrophils, eosinophils or to defined cut-off of validated histopathologic indexes may represent a useful tool to predict ER and should be considered at therapeutic and surveillance decision process.

Ustekinumab has shown efficacy in Crohn’s Disease (CD) patients. To identify patient profiles of those who benefit the most from this treatment would help to position this drug in the therapeutic paradigm of CD and generate hypotheses for future trials. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether baseline patient characteristics are predictive of remission and the drug durability of ustekinumab, and whether its positioning with respect to prior use of biologics has a significant effect after correcting for disease severity and phenotype at baseline using interpretable machine learning. Patients’ data from SUSTAIN, a retrospective multicenter single-arm cohort study, were used. Disease phenotype, baseline laboratory data, and prior treatment characteristics were documented. Clinical remission was defined as the Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤ 4 and was tracked longitudinally. Drug durability was defined as the time until a patient discontinued treatment. A total of 439 participants from 60 centers were included and a total of 20 baseline covariates considered. Less exposure to previous biologics had a positive effect on remission, even after controlling for baseline disease severity using a non-linear, additive, multivariable model. Additionally, age, body mass index, and fecal calprotectin at baseline were found to be statistically significant as independent negative risk factors for both remission and drug survival, with further risk factors identified for remission.

Extraintestinal manifestations, in general, and in particular arthropathies, are a common problem in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. In fact, the relationship between those 2entities is close and there are increasingly more data which suggest that the bowel plays a significant role in the aetiopathogenesis of spondyloarthritis. The association of inflammatory bowel disease with any kind of spondyloarthritis represents a challenging clinical scenario. It is therefore necessary that both gastroenterologists and rheumatologists work together and establish a fluent communication that enables the patient to receive the most appropriate treatment for each specific situation. The aim of this review is to make some recommendations about the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease and associated spondyloarthritis, in each different clinical scenario.

(1) Scant information is available concerning the characteristics that may favour the acquisition of COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess these differences between infected and noninfected patients with IBD. (2) This nationwide case–control study evaluated patients with inflammatory bowel disease with COVID-19 (cases) and without COVID-19 (controls) during the period March–July 2020 included in the ENEIDA of GETECCU. (3) A total of 496 cases and 964 controls from 73 Spanish centres were included. No differences were found in the basal characteristics between cases and controls. Cases had higher comorbidity Charlson scores (24% vs. 19%; p = 0.02) and occupational risk (28% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.0001) more frequently than did controls. Lockdown was the only protective measure against COVID-19 (50% vs. 70%; p < 0.0001). No differences were found in the use of systemic steroids, immunosuppressants or biologics between cases and controls. Cases were more often treated with 5-aminosalicylates (42% vs. 34%; p = 0.003). Having a moderate Charlson score (OR: 2.7; 95%CI: 1.3–5.9), occupational risk (OR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.8–4.4) and the use of 5-aminosalicylates (OR: 1.7; 95%CI: 1.2–2.5) were factors for COVID-19. The strict lockdown was the only protective factor (OR: 0.1; 95%CI: 0.09–0.2). (4) Comorbidities and occupational exposure are the most relevant factors for COVID-19 in patients with IBD. The risk of COVID-19 seems not to be increased by immunosuppressants or biologics, with a potential effect of 5-aminosalicylates, which should be investigated further and interpreted with caution.