Sandra Maria MARIA Hartz

Dr. Sandra Maria MARIA Hartz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2006 in Austral Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LDLeandro DA S. Duarte
Leandro DA S. Duarte
MDMelina M. G. Dos‐Santos
Melina M. G. Dos‐Santos
SHSandra Maria MARIA Hartz
Sandra Maria MARIA Hartz
VPValério Depatta Pillar
Valério Depatta Pillar

1 June 2009 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CFCarlos R. Fonseca
Carlos R. Fonseca
GGGislene Ganade
Gislene Ganade
RBRonei Baldissera
Ronei Baldissera
CBCarlos G. Becker
Carlos G. Becker
CBCarlos R. Boelter
Carlos R. Boelter
Emerson Monteiro VieiraEmerson Monteiro Vieira
Emerson Monteiro Vieira

9 January 2017 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FTFernanda Zimmermann Teixeira
Fernanda Zimmermann Teixeira
AKAndreas Kindel
Andreas Kindel
SHSandra Maria MARIA Hartz
Sandra Maria MARIA Hartz
SMScott Mitchell
Scott Mitchell
LFLenore Fahrig
Lenore Fahrig

1 June 2002 in Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FVFábio Silveira Vilella
Fábio Silveira Vilella
FBFernando Gertum Becker
Fernando Gertum Becker
SHSandra Maria MARIA Hartz
Sandra Maria MARIA Hartz
Feeding habits of six species of Astyanax from river Maquiné are described. Fishes were sampled bi-monthly from November/95 to September/96 in two zones of the river. Items were identified, counted and had their abundance estimated according to a semi-quantitative scale. Frequency of occurrence, alimentary importance index (IFI) values and a similarity analysis of diets for each species-river zone sample were examined. All the species were considered typically omnivorous, with insects and vegetal matter being the most important items in their diet. These species could act as seed dispersers, particularly for macrophytes. Intra-specific spatial differences were not observed in comparisons of samples from two diferent regions of the river, except for A. fasciatus. The presence of Podostemaceae macrophytes in the mid-course of the river seemed to be important both as an autochthonous food resource and as habitat for several organisms preyed by the Astyanax species.

30 August 2020 in Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MNMariana Nagy‐Reis
Mariana Nagy‐Reis
JOJulia Oshima
Julia Oshima
CKClaudia Zukeran Kanda
Claudia Zukeran Kanda
FPFrancesca Belem Lopes Palmeira
Francesca Belem Lopes Palmeira
FMFabiano Rodrigues de Melo
Fabiano Rodrigues de Melo
ACANA COR
ANA COR
Mammalian carnivores are considered a key group in maintaining ecological health and can indicate potential ecological integrity in landscapes where they occur. Carnivores also hold high conservation value and their habitat requirements can guide management and conservation plans. The order Carnivora has 84 species from 8 families in the Neotropical region: Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Otariidae; Phocidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae. Herein, we include published and unpublished data on native terrestrial Neotropical carnivores (Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae). NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES is a publicly available data set that includes 99,605 data entries from 35,511 unique georeferenced coordinates. Detection/non‐detection and quantitative data were obtained from 1818 to 2018 by researchers, governmental agencies, non‐governmental organizations, and private consultants. Data were collected using several methods including camera trapping, museum collections, roadkill, line transect, and opportunistic records. Literature (peer‐reviewed and grey literature) from Portuguese, Spanish and English were incorporated in this compilation. Most of the data set consists of detection data entries (n = 79,343; 79.7%) but also includes non‐detection data (n = 20,262; 20.3%). Of those, 43.3% also include count data (n = 43,151). The information available in NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES will contribute to macroecological, ecological, and conservation questions in multiple spatio‐temporal perspectives. As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems. Our data paper, combined with other large‐scale data sets, has great potential to clarify species distribution and related ecological processes within the Neotropics. There are no copyright restrictions and no restriction for using data from this data paper, as long as the data paper is cited as the source of the information used. We also request that users inform us of how they intend to use the data.

1 September 2006 in Revista Brasileira de Zoologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEzequiel Pedó
Ezequiel Pedó
ATAna C. Tomazzoni
Ana C. Tomazzoni
SHSandra Maria MARIA Hartz
Sandra Maria MARIA Hartz
ACAlexandre U. Christoff
Alexandre U. Christoff
The crab-eating fox, Cerdocyon thous (Linnaeus, 1766), is a small canid with twilight and nocturnal habits from savannas and forests of South America. In this study, we seasonally determined and quantified the diet of C. thous in Lami Biological Reserve, a conservation unit with 179.78ha situated in a suburban area in the municipality of Porto Alegre, southern Brazil. During the year 2000, we collected 80 fecal samples - 20 for each season - in two or three week sampling intervals, along trails inside the Reserve. Samples were dried in an oven for 24h at 60ºC, immersed in 70% alcohol, and prey items were identified using a stereomicroscope. The diet of the crab-eating fox was essentially carnivorous (87.62% composed by vertebrates), with seasonal variation (p = 0.0009) and absence of fruits. Small non-flying mammals and birds were the most frequent prey, being proportionally more preyed in autumn and summer, respectively. Arthropods were more preyed in winter and spring and bird/reptile eggs only in summer and spring, in the reproduction period of these groups.