Lijun Yao

Prof. Lijun Yao

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2019 in Epilepsy & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LYLijun Yao
Lijun Yao
MCMengting Cai
Mengting Cai
YCYang Chen
Yang Chen
CSChunhong Shen
Chunhong Shen
LSLei Shi
Lei Shi
YGYi Guo
Yi Guo

1 June 2021 in Advances in Physiology Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LYLijun Yao
Lijun Yao
KLKun Li
Kun Li
JHJing He
Jing He
LLLing Liu
Ling Liu
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic has changed the way most people live and work, including the way in which students undertake study. To protect students during the pandemic, most schools in China adopted a study-at-home model. Under these circumstances, the pathophysiology teaching team at Tongji University considered how to reform teaching methods to minimize the impact of the pandemic on students’ curriculum studies. This article describes our teaching reforms in detail, notably a combination of online education resources, online discussion courses, and a WeChat study group. We compared the effects of the reformed and traditional teaching approaches, including student performance and student evaluation of the reformed teaching methods. Analysis showed that although students were generally worried about the impact of the pandemic on their curriculum studies, their overall performance was not affected by the reformed teaching methods. Of interest, compared with traditional teaching, the proportion of students with higher final test scores (≥90 points) actually increased. The revised teaching methods promoted the learning of some students externally and internally and enhanced their enthusiasm for medical study and their academic performance. These approaches could be applied as a reference for future course arrangements after the pandemic.

24 November 2020 in Frontiers in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YGYi Guo
Yi Guo
YLYushan Liu
Yushan Liu
WMWenjie Ming
Wenjie Ming
ZWZhongjin Wang
Zhongjin Wang
JZJunming Zhu
Junming Zhu
CSChunhong Shen
Chunhong Shen
Purpose: We are aiming to build a supervised machine learning-based classifier, in order to preoperatively distinguish focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) from glioneuronal tumors (GNTs) in patients with epilepsy.Methods: This retrospective study was comprised of 96 patients who underwent epilepsy surgery, with the final neuropathologic diagnosis of either an FCD or GNTs. Seven classical machine learning algorithms (i.e., Random Forest, SVM, Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost) were employed and trained by our dataset to get the classification model. Ten features [i.e., Gender, Past history, Age at seizure onset, Course of disease, Seizure type, Seizure frequency, Scalp EEG biomarkers, MRI features, Lesion location, Number of antiepileptic drug (AEDs)] were analyzed in our study.Results: We enrolled 56 patients with FCD and 40 patients with GNTs, which included 29 with gangliogliomas (GGs) and 11 with dysembryoplasic neuroepithelial tumors (DNTs). Our study demonstrated that the Random Forest-based machine learning model offered the best predictive performance on distinguishing the diagnosis of FCD from GNTs, with an F1-score of 0.9180 and AUC value of 0.9340. Furthermore, the most discriminative factor between FCD and GNTs was the feature “age at seizure onset” with the Chi-square value of 1,213.0, suggesting that patients who had a younger age at seizure onset were more likely to be diagnosed as FCD.Conclusion: The Random Forest-based machine learning classifier can accurately differentiate FCD from GNTs in patients with epilepsy before surgery. This might lead to improved clinician confidence in appropriate surgical planning and treatment outcomes.

24 November 2022 in Heliyon
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LYLijun Yao
Lijun Yao
ZXZhiwei Xu
Zhiwei Xu
XZXudong Zhao
Xudong Zhao
YCYang Chen
Yang Chen
LLLiang Liu
Liang Liu
FCFazhan Chen
Fazhan Chen
Side effects in the psychotherapy are sometimes unavoidable. Therapists play a significant role in the side effects of psychotherapy, but there have been few quantitative studies on the mechanisms by which therapists contribute to them. We designed the psychotherapy Side Effects Questionnaire-Therapist Version (PSEQ-T) and released it online through an official WeChat account, where 530 therapists participated in the cross-sectional analysis. The therapists were classified into groups with and without perceptions of clients’ side effects. A number of features were selected to distinguish the therapists by category. Six machine learning-based algorithms were selected and trained by our dataset to build classification models. We leveraged the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to quantify the importance of each feature to the therapist categories. Our study demonstrated the following: (1) Of the therapists, 316 perceived clients’ side effects in psychotherapy, with a 59.6% incidence of side effects; the most common type was “make the clients or patients feel bad” (49.8%). (2) A Random Forest-based machine-learning classifier offered the best predictive performance to distinguish the therapists with and without perceptions of clients' side effects, with an F1 score of 0.722 and an AUC value of 0.717. (3) “Therapists’ psychological activity” was the most relevant feature for distinguishing the therapist category. Our study revealed that the therapist's mastery of the limitations of psychotherapy technology and theory, especially the awareness and construction of their psychological states, was the most critical factor in predicting the therapist's perception of the side effects of psychotherapy.

1 August 2023 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HXHua Xing
Hua Xing
XSXiaojie Su
Xiaojie Su
YLYushan Liu
Yushan Liu
YCYang Chen
Yang Chen
YJYubin Ju
Yubin Ju
LGLi Gong
Li Gong
Objective To build a supervised machine learning-based classifier, which can accurately predict whether Tai Chi practitioners may experience knee pain after years of exercise. Design A prospective approach was used. Data were collected using face-to-face through a self-designed questionnaire. Setting Single centre in Shanghai, China. Participants A total of 1750 Tai Chi practitioners with a course of Tai Chi exercise over 5 years were randomly selected. Measures All participants were measured by a questionnaire survey including personal information, Tai Chi exercise pattern and Irrgang Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale. The validity of the questionnaire was analysed by logical analysis and test, and the reliability of this questionnaire was mainly tested by a re-test method. Dataset 1 was established by whether the participant had knee pain, and dataset 2 by whether the participant’s knee pain affected daily living function. Then both datasets were randomly assigned to a training and validating dataset and a test dataset in a ratio of 7:3. Six machine learning algorithms were selected and trained by our dataset. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the performance of the trained models, which determined the best prediction model. Results A total of 1703 practitioners completed the questionnaire and 47 were eliminated for lack of information. The total reliability of the scale is 0.94 and the KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy) value of the scale validity was 0.949 (>0.7). The CatBoost algorithm-based machine-learning model achieved the best predictive performance in distinguishing practitioners with different degrees of knee pain after Tai Chi practice. ‘Having knee pain before Tai Chi practice’, ‘knee joint warm-up’ and ‘duration of each exercise’ are the top three factors associated with pain after Tai Chi exercise in the model. ‘Having knee pain before Tai Chi practice’, ‘Having Instructor’ and ‘Duration of each exercise’ were most relevant to whether pain interfered with daily life in the model. Conclusion CatBoost-based machine learning classifier accurately predicts knee pain symptoms after practicing Tai Chi. This study provides an essential reference for practicing Tai Chi scientifically to avoid knee pain.

4 April 2021 in JMIR Preprints
Verified
Preprint
Open access
LYLijun Yao
Lijun Yao
ZXZhiwei Xu
Zhiwei Xu
XZXudong Zhao
Xudong Zhao
YCYang Chen
Yang Chen
LLLiang Liu
Liang Liu
FCFazhan Chen
Fazhan Chen
BACKGROUND Side effects in psychotherapy are sometimes unavoidable. Therapists play a significant role in the side effects of psychotherapy, but there have been few quantitative studies on the mechanisms by which therapists contribute to them. OBJECTIVE Using machine learning techniques to distinguish therapists with and without the perception of consulting side effects, and identify the predictive factors of therapists who could perceive client side effects in psychotherapy. METHODS We designed the Psychotherapy Side Effects Questionnaire-Therapist Version (PSEQ-T) and released it online through an official WeChat account, where 530 therapists participated in the cross-sectional analysis. The therapists were classified into groups with and without perceptions of clients’ side effects. A number of features were selected to distinguish the therapists by category. Six machine learning–based algorithms were selected and trained by our dataset to build classification models. To make the prediction model interpretable, we leveraged the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to quantify the importance of each feature to the therapist categories. RESULTS Our study demonstrated the following: 1) Of the therapists, 316 perceived the side effects of the clients in the ongoing psychotherapy sessions, with a 59.6% incidence of side effects. Among all 7 perception types of the side effects, the most common was “make the clients or patients feel bad” (49.8%). 2) A random forest–based machine-learning classifier offered the best predictive performance to distinguish the therapists with and without perceptions of clients’ side effects, with an F1 score of 0.722 and an AUC value of 0.717. 3) When “therapists’ psychological activity” was considered a possible cause of the side effects in psychotherapy by the therapists, it was the most relevant feature for distinguishing the therapist category. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed that the therapist's mastery of the limitations of psychotherapy technology and theory, especially the awareness and construction of their own psychological states, was the most important factor in predicting the therapist's perception of the side effects of psychotherapy.