Caring for cancer patients is generally considered very rewarding work, but it can also be stressful and demanding. Therefore, it is important for oncology healthcare professionals to feel satisfied with their work environment in order to provide the best care possible. An ethics-approved 61-item staff satisfaction survey was developed in-house to gain insights regarding workplace satisfaction among all staff at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the responses. A total of 478 individuals completed the online survey, with 75.1% women, 23.2% men, and 1.7% preferring not to say. This represented the vast majority (>75%) of cancer center staff. The approximate breakdown according to healthcare professional type was as follows: 21% nurses, 20% radiation therapists, 18% physicians, 13% clerical staff, and 28% other types of staff. Almost all (97.4%) generally enjoyed their work, with 60% stating “very much” and 37.4% stating “a little bit”, and 93.3% found working with cancer patients rewarding. The overall satisfaction level at work was high, with 30.1% reporting “very satisfied” and 54.2% “somewhat satisfied”. However, in terms of their work being stressful, 18.6% stated it was “very much” and 62.1% “a little bit”. Also, in terms of their workload, 61.3% stated it was “very busy” and 10% stated it was “excessively busy”. The most enjoyable aspects of work were listed as interactions with colleagues, interactions with patients, and learning new things. The least enjoyable aspects of work were excessive workload, a perceived unsupportive work environment, and technology problems. Levels of satisfaction and stress at work varied according to role at the cancer center. Most cancer center staff seem to enjoy their work and find it rewarding. However, the work environment can be challenging and stressful. Areas for improvement include managing workloads, ensuring staff feel supported, and improving the user-friendliness of technology.

Published research involving Indigenous Peoples is largely deficit-based, which can perpetuate stereotypes against Indigenous Peoples. We conducted a scoping review to understand what is currently known about the linguistic representation of Indigenous Peoples. We included peer-reviewed articles from all disciplines published between 2000 and 2024 on language use and discourse in the context of framing, bias, and/or stereotyping of Indigenous Peoples in Canada, the United States, Australia, and Aotearoa New Zealand. Of 1672 articles, 80 were reviewed and analyzed by mode of language, field of study, and time. A subset of the articles (n = 60) underwent a reflexive thematic analysis, from which we identified seven themes. We found that linguistic representations of Indigenous Peoples were disproportionately negative and involved deficit- rather than strengths-based discourse. Greater attention to linguistic representations of Indigenous Peoples is needed within healthcare and education, and future research should include language in historical documents and academia.

To evaluate the factors influencing the outcomes of patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastasis followed by either surveillance or post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated radiotherapy (SRS/SFRT), a retrospective multi-center chart review was performed on all patients who underwent brain metastases resection in British Columbia between 2018 and 2020. Patients with prior whole-brain radiotherapy were excluded from the study. The primary study endpoints included local recurrence, distant intracranial control, radionecrosis (RN), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and overall survival (OS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze survival. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses to identify predictors of local control. A total of 113 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 31 patients received adjuvant SRS/SFRT to the surgical cavity, while 82 went on observation. The 12-month local control was 69% (50–88%) for the SRS/SFRT cohort and 31% (18–45%) for the observation cohort (p < 0.001). The 12-month distant intracranial control was 44% (26–63%) for the SRS/SFRT cohort and 46% (30–62%) for the observation cohort (p = 0.9). Sensitivity analysis did not show a difference in overall survival (p = 0.6). En bloc resection (p < 0.05), resection without residual disease (p < 0.05), and SRS/SFRT (p < 0.001) were predictive of local control on MVA. Three SRS/SFRT patients (10%) and two observation patients (2%) developed LMD. Four SRS/SFRT patients experienced RN (13%), with no grade 3 or higher toxicities observed. Post-operative SRT outcomes based on real-world population data are consistent with the data from clinical trials and support the established guidelines. For patients requiring surgical resection of brain metastasis, en bloc gross total resection should be encouraged when feasible to reduce local recurrence.

Total body irradiation (TBI) is commonly used for myeloablative conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in high-risk, relapsed, or refractory hematologic malignancies. Pulmonary toxicity (PT)—including pneumonia, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, and interstitial pneumonitis—is a serious complication after HSCT. Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS), defined as widespread alveolar injury without cardiogenic or infectious causes, represents a non-infectious form of PT. This study characterizes PT and IPS and explores associated factors following TBI-based HSCT in adults. We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of adult patients treated with TBI-based HSCT from 2015 to 2022. Clinical records and chest imaging were reviewed to identify PT and IPS. IPS occurred in 20 patients (18%) of the cohort, with 8 patients (7%) within 100 days and 13 patients (13%) after 100 days. One patient experienced both early- and late-onset IPS and was counted once in the cumulative analysis. Early pulmonary infection was associated with reduced overall survival in both univariable (p = 0.002) and multivariable 100-day landmark analyses (p = 0.047). Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was independently associated with improved survival (p = 0.017), whereas chronic GVHD was not statistically significant in the landmark analyses. PT and IPS incidences were consistent with previously published adult TBI cohorts. While no significant clinical or radiation-related predictors of IPS were identified, pulmonary infection emerged as a predictor of inferior overall survival.