Min Zhao

Dr. Min Zhao

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 March 2020 in General Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JQJianyin Qiu
Jianyin Qiu
BSBin Shen
Bin Shen
MZMin Zhao
Min Zhao
ZWZhen Wang
Zhen Wang
BXBin Xie
Bin Xie
YXYifeng Xu
Yifeng Xu
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) epidemic emerged in Wuhan, China, spread nationwide and then onto half a dozen other countries between December 2019 and early 2020. The implementation of unprecedented strict quarantine measures in China has kept a large number of people in isolation and affected many aspects of people’s lives. It has also triggered a wide variety of psychological problems, such as panic disorder, anxiety and depression. This study is the first nationwide large‐scale survey of psychological distress in the general population of China during the COVID‐19 epidemic.

1 September 2014 in General Hospital Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWenzheng Wang
Wenzheng Wang
QBQian Bian
Qian Bian
YZYan Zhao
Yan Zhao
XLXu Li
Xu Li
WWWenwen Wang
Wenwen Wang
MZMin Zhao
Min Zhao

1 November 2020 in General Hospital Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJiang Du
Jiang Du
LDLu Dong
Lu Dong
TWTao Wang
Tao Wang
CYChenxin Yuan
Chenxin Yuan
RFRao Fu
Rao Fu
XLXin Li
Xin Li

18 December 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WLWei Lu
Wei Lu
QBQian Bian
Qian Bian
WWWenzheng Wang
Wenzheng Wang
XWXiaoling Wu
Xiaoling Wu
YGYihan Guo
Yihan Guo
MZMin Zhao
Min Zhao
Chinese university students often suffer from acute stress, which can affect their mental health. We measured and evaluated perceived stress in this population using the Simplified Chinese version of the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (SCPSS-10). The SCPSS-10, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) were conducted in 1096 university students. Two weeks later, 129 participants were re-tested using the SCPSS-10. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two factors with Eigen values of 4.76 and 1.48, accounting for 62.41% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit of this two-factor model. The internal consistency reliability, as measured by Cronbach’s α, was 0.85. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.7. The SCPSS-10 exhibited high correlation with the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, indicating an acceptable concurrent validity. The SCPSS-10 exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties in Chinese university students.

14 May 2019 in BMC Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAngélica Medeiros Claudino
Angélica Medeiros Claudino
KPKathleen M. Pike
Kathleen M. Pike
PHPhillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay
JKJared W. Keeley
Jared W. Keeley
SESpencer C. Evans
Spencer C. Evans
GRGeoffrey M. Reed
Geoffrey M. Reed
The World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) is used globally by 194 WHO member nations. It is used for assigning clinical diagnoses, providing the framework for reporting public health data, and to inform the organization and reimbursement of health services. Guided by overarching principles of increasing clinical utility and global applicability, the 11th revision of the ICD proposes major changes that incorporate empirical advances since the previous revision in 1992. To test recommended changes in the Mental, Behavioral, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders chapter, multiple vignette-based case-controlled field studies have been conducted which examine clinicians’ ability to accurately and consistently use the new guidelines and assess their overall clinical utility. This manuscript reports on the results from the study of the proposed ICD-11 guidelines for feeding and eating disorders (FEDs). Participants were 2288 mental health professionals registered with WHO’s Global Clinical Practice Network. The study was conducted in Chinese, English, French, Japanese, and Spanish. Clinicians were randomly assigned to apply either the ICD-11 or ICD-10 diagnostic guidelines for FEDs to a pair of case vignettes designed to test specific clinical questions. Clinicians selected the diagnosis they thought was correct for each vignette, evaluated the presence of each essential feature of the selected diagnosis, and the clinical utility of the diagnostic guidelines. The proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines significantly improved accuracy for all FEDs tested relative to ICD-10 and attained higher clinical utility ratings; similar results were obtained across all five languages. The inclusion of binge eating disorder and avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder reduced the use of residual diagnoses. Areas needing further refinement were identified. The proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines consistently outperformed ICD-10 in distinguishing cases of eating disorders and showed global applicability and appropriate clinical utility. These results suggest that the proposed ICD-11 guidelines for FEDs will help increase accuracy of public health data, improve clinical diagnosis, and enhance health service organization and provision. This is the first time in the revision of the ICD that data from large-scale, empirical research examining proposed guidelines is completed in time to inform the final diagnostic guidelines.

1 June 2017 in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HSHang Su
Hang Su
NZNa Zhong
Na Zhong
HGHong Gan
Hong Gan
JWJijun Wang
Jijun Wang
HHHui Han
Hui Han
MZMin Zhao
Min Zhao