Maria Cristina Izar

Dr. Maria Cristina Izar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 August 2010 in Genes & Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Maria Cristina IzarMaria Cristina Izar
Maria Cristina Izar
DTDaniela M. Tegani
Daniela M. Tegani
SKSoraia H. Kasmas
Soraia H. Kasmas
FFFrancisco A. Fonseca
Francisco A. Fonseca

27 January 2021 in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria Cristina IzarMaria Cristina Izar
Maria Cristina Izar
ALAna Maria Lottenberg
Ana Maria Lottenberg
VGViviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez
Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez
RSRaul D Santos
Raul D Santos
RMRoberta Marcondes Machado
Roberta Marcondes Machado
VMValéria Arruda Machado
Valéria Arruda Machado
Lista de Siglas ACC – American College of Cardiology Acetil-CoA – acetilcoenzima A […] Posicionamento sobre o Consumo de Gorduras e Saúde Cardiovascular – 2021 Lista de Siglas ACC – American College of Cardiology Acetil-CoA – acetilcoenzima A […] Posicionamento sobre o Consumo de Gorduras e Saúde Cardiovascular – 2021

28 January 2011 in International Journal of Experimental Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
THTatiana Helfenstein
Tatiana Helfenstein
FFFrancisco A. Fonseca
Francisco A. Fonseca
SISílvia S. Ihara
Sílvia S. Ihara
JBJuliana M. Bottós
Juliana M. Bottós
FMFlávio T. Moreira
Flávio T. Moreira
Maria Cristina IzarMaria Cristina Izar
Maria Cristina Izar

14 July 2017 in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMarcello Casaccia Bertoluci
Marcello Casaccia Bertoluci
RMRodrigo Oliveira Moreira
Rodrigo Oliveira Moreira
AFAndré Faludi
André Faludi
Maria Cristina IzarMaria Cristina Izar
Maria Cristina Izar
BSBeatriz Schaan
Beatriz Schaan
RSRaul D Santos
Raul D Santos
Since the first position statement on diabetes and cardiovascular prevention published in 2014 by the Brazilian Diabetes Society, the current view on primary and secondary prevention in diabetes has evolved as a result of new approaches on cardiovascular risk stratification, new cholesterol lowering drugs, and new anti-hyperglycemic drugs. Importantly, a pattern of risk heterogeneity has emerged, showing that not all diabetic patients are at high or very high risk. In fact, most younger patients who have no overt cardiovascular risk factors may be more adequately classified as being at intermediate or even low cardiovascular risk. Thus, there is a need for cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with diabetes. The present panel reviews the best current evidence and proposes a practical risk-based approach on treatment for patients with diabetes. The Brazilian Diabetes Society, the Brazilian Society of Cardiology, and the Brazilian Endocrinology and Metabolism Society gathered to form an expert panel including 28 cardiologists and endocrinologists to review the best available evidence and to draft up-to-date an evidence-based guideline with practical recommendations for risk stratification and prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes. The guideline includes 59 recommendations covering: (1) the impact of new anti-hyperglycemic drugs and new lipid lowering drugs on cardiovascular risk; (2) a guide to statin use, including new definitions of LDL-cholesterol and in non-HDL-cholesterol targets; (3) evaluation of silent myocardial ischemia and subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes; (4) hypertension treatment; and (5) the use of antiplatelet therapy. Diabetes is a heterogeneous disease. Although cardiovascular risk is increased in most patients, those without risk factors or evidence of sub-clinical atherosclerosis are at a lower risk. Optimal management must rely on an approach that will cover both cardiovascular disease prevention in individuals in the highest risk as well as protection from overtreatment in those at lower risk. Thus, cardiovascular prevention strategies should be individualized according to cardiovascular risk while intensification of treatment should focus on those at higher risk.

28 April 2019 in British Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECEdna S. Costa
Edna S. Costa
CFCarolina Nunes França
Carolina Nunes França
FFFrancisco A. H. Fonseca
Francisco A. H. Fonseca
JKJuliana T. Kato
Juliana T. Kato
HBHenrique T. Bianco
Henrique T. Bianco
Maria Cristina IzarMaria Cristina Izar
Maria Cristina Izar
Diabetes mellitus is a global epidemic, characterised as a heterogeneous group of metabolic disorders associated with high risk of CVD. Green banana biomass, which is composed of resistant starches (RS) and cannot be hydrolysed by amylases, delays gastric emptying and modulates insulin sensitivity, thus contributing to improve metabolic disorders. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of consumption of RS from green banana biomass on body composition, fasting plasma glucose, glycated Hb (HbA1c) and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance in subjects with pre-diabetes or type 2 diabetes on top of treatment. Middle-aged subjects (n113) of both sexes with pre-diabetes (HbA1c: 5·7–6·4 %) or diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 6·5 %) were randomised to receive nutritional support plus green banana biomass (40 g) (RS: approximately 4·5 g, G1,n62) or diet alone (G2,n51) for 24 weeks. Body composition, biochemical analyses and dietary intake were evaluated at the beginning and end of the study. In the experimental group (G1), consumption of RS was associated with reduction in HbA1c (P= 0·0001), fasting glucose (P= 0·021), diastolic blood pressure (P= 0·010), body weight (P= 0·002), BMI (P= 0·006), waist and hip circumferences (P< 0·01), fat mass percentage (P= 0·001) and increase in lean mass percentage (P= 0·011). In controls (G2), reductions were observed in waist and hip circumferences (P< 0·01), HbA1c (P= 0·002) and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (P= 0·020). In pre-diabetes or diabetes, non-significant differences were observed in the percentage reduction in HbA1c and fasting glucose in exploratory analyses. Our results indicate that the consumption of bioactive starches is a good dietary strategy to improve metabolic control and body composition.

2 August 2011 in Nutrition Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSilvia C Ramos
Silvia C Ramos
FFFrancisco Antonio Antonio Helfenstein Helfenstein Fonseca
Francisco Antonio Antonio Helfenstein Helfenstein Fonseca
SKSoraia H Kasmas
Soraia H Kasmas
FMFlávio T Moreira
Flávio T Moreira
THTatiana Helfenstein
Tatiana Helfenstein
Maria Cristina IzarMaria Cristina Izar
Maria Cristina Izar
Background: It has been demonstrated that statins can increase intestinal sterol absorption. Augments in phytosterolemia seems related to cardiovascular disease. Objective: We examined the role of soluble fiber intake in endogenous cholesterol synthesis and in sterol absorption among subjects under highly effective lipid-lowering therapy. Design: In an open label, randomized, parallel-design study with blinded endpoints, subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia (n = 116) were assigned to receive during 12 weeks, a daily dose of 25 g of fiber (corresponding to 6 g of soluble fibers) plus rosuvastatin 40 mg (n = 28), rosuvastatin 40 mg alone (n = 30), sinvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg plus 25 g of fiber (n = 28), or sinvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 30) alone. Results: The four assigned therapies produced similar changes in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides (p < 0.001 vs. baseline) and did not change HDL-cholesterol. Fiber intake decreased plasma campesterol (p < 0.001 vs. baseline), particularly among those patients receiving ezetimibe (p < 0.05 vs. other groups), and β-sitosterol (p = 0.03 vs. baseline), with a trend for lower levels in the group receiving fiber plus ezetimibe (p = 0.07). Treatment with rosuvastatin alone or combined with soluble fiber was associated with decreased levels of desmosterol (p = 0.003 vs. other groups). Compared to non-fiber supplemented individuals, those treated with fibers had weight loss (p = 0.04), reduced body mass index (p = 0.002) and blood glucose (p = 0.047). Conclusion: Among subjects treated with highly effective lipid-lowering therapy, the intake of 25 g of fibers added favorable effects, mainly by reducing phytosterolemia. Additional benefits include improvement in blood glucose and anthropometric parameters.