Lori Pbert

Prof. Dr. Lori Pbert

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2015 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lori PbertLori Pbert
Lori Pbert
HFHarold Farber
Harold Farber
KHKimberly Horn
Kimberly Horn
HLHarry A. Lando
Harry A. Lando
MMMyra Muramoto
Myra Muramoto
JKJonathan D. Klein
Jonathan D. Klein
BACKGROUND: A National Spina Bifida Patient Registry (NSBPR) was begun in 2009 to help understand the natural history of spina bifida (SB) and the effects of treatments provided by SB clinics. We used the NSBPR to explore the relationship of sociodemographic characteristics with SB outcomes. METHODS: Using NSBPR data collected in 2009 to 2012, we examined the unadjusted association between demographic characteristics and 4 SB outcomes: bowel continence, bladder continence, mobility, and presence of pressure sores. We then developed multivariable logistic models to explore these relationships while controlling for SB clinic, SB type, and level of lesion. RESULTS: Data were available on 2054 patients <22 years of age from 10 SB clinics. In the multivariable models, older age groups were more likely to have continence and pressure sores and less likely to be community ambulatory. Males and patients without private insurance were less likely to be continent and community ambulatory. Non-Hispanic blacks were less likely to be continent. Level of lesion was associated with all outcomes; SB type was associated with all but pressure sores; and all outcomes except community ambulation showed significant variation across clinic sites. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic attributes are associated with SB outcomes. In particular, males, non-Hispanic blacks, and patients without private insurance have less favorable outcomes, and age has an impact as well. These characteristics need to be considered by clinicians who care for this patient population and factored into case-mix adjustment when evaluating variation in clinical and functional outcomes among different SB clinics.

1 April 2008 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lori PbertLori Pbert
Lori Pbert
AFAlan J. Flint
Alan J. Flint
KFKenneth E. Fletcher
Kenneth E. Fletcher
MYMartin H. Young
Martin H. Young
SDSusan Druker
Susan Druker
JDJoseph R. DiFranza
Joseph R. DiFranza
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to determine whether a pediatric practice-based smoking prevention and cessation intervention increases abstinence rates among adolescents.METHODS. Eight pediatric primary care clinics were randomly assigned to either intervention or usual care control condition. The provider- and peer-delivered intervention tested was based on the 5A model recommended by the US Public Health Service clinical practice guidelines and the American Academy of Pediatrics and consisted of brief counseling by the pediatric provider followed by 1 visit and 4 telephone calls by older peer counselors aged 21 to 25 years. A consecutive sample of patients aged 13 to 17 years scheduled for an office visit was eligible regardless of smoking status. Of 2711 patients who agreed to participate, 2709 completed baseline assessments, and 2700 (99.6%) and 2690 (99.2%) completed 6- and 12-month assessments, respectively.RESULTS. Compared with the usual care condition, nonsmokers who received the provider- and peer-delivered intervention were significantly more likely to self-report having remained abstinent at 6-month and 12-month follow-up; smokers who received the provider- and peer-delivered intervention were more likely to report having quit at the 6-month but not the 12-month follow-up. A number of adolescent characteristics (eg, age, peer smoking, tobacco dependence, and susceptibility) were found to be predictive of abstinence at follow-up.CONCLUSIONS. A pediatric practice-based intervention delivered by pediatric providers and older peer counselors proved feasible and effective in discouraging the initiation of smoking among nonsmoking adolescents for 1 year and in increasing abstinence rates among smokers for 6 months.

12 September 2016 in Journal of School Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lori PbertLori Pbert
Lori Pbert
SDSusan Druker
Susan Druker
BBBruce Barton
Bruce Barton
KSKristin L. Schneider
Kristin L. Schneider
BOBarbara Olendzki
Barbara Olendzki
SOStavroula Osganian
Stavroula Osganian

24 January 2013 in Journal of School Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lori PbertLori Pbert
Lori Pbert
SDSusan Druker
Susan Druker
MGMary A. Gapinski
Mary A. Gapinski
LGLauren Gellar
Lauren Gellar
RMRobert Magner
Robert Magner
SOStavroula Osganian
Stavroula Osganian

1 January 1999 in Health Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lori PbertLori Pbert
Lori Pbert
AAAbigail Adams
Abigail Adams
MQMark Quirk
Mark Quirk
JHJames R. Hebert
James R. Hebert
JOJudith K. Ockene
Judith K. Ockene
RLRose S. Luippold
Rose S. Luippold
In evaluating the efficacy of physician-delivered counseling interventions for health behavior changes such as smoking cessation, a major challenge is determining the degree to which interventions are implemented by physicians. The Patient Exit Interview (PEI; J. Ockene et al., 1991) is a brief measure of a patient's perception of the content and quantity of smoking cessation intervention received from his or her physician. One hundred eight current smokers seen in a primary care clinic completed a PEI following their physician visit. Participants were 45% male, 95% Caucasian, with a mean age of 42 years and an average of 22 years of smoking. The PEI correlated well with a criterion measure of an audiotape assessment of the physician-patient interaction (r = .67, p < .001). When discrepancy occurred, in general it was due to patients' over-reporting of intervention as compared with the criterion measure. Implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.

1 June 2003 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lori PbertLori Pbert
Lori Pbert
EMEric T. Moolchan
Eric T. Moolchan
MMMyra Muramoto
Myra Muramoto
JWJonathan P. Winickoff
Jonathan P. Winickoff
SCSusan Curry
Susan Curry
JKJonathan D. Klein
Jonathan D. Klein
Tobacco use is a serious pediatric health issue as dependence begins during childhood or adolescence in the majority of tobacco users. Primary care settings provide tremendous opportunities for delivering tobacco treatment to young tobacco users. Although evidence-based practice guidelines for treating nicotine dependence in youths are not yet available, professional organizations and the current clinical practice guideline for adults provide recommendations based on expert opinion. This article reports on the current tobacco treatment practices of pediatric and family practice clinicians, discusses similarities and differences between adolescent and adult tobacco use, summarizes research efforts to date and current cutting-edge research that may ultimately help to inform and guide clinicians, and presents existing recommendations regarding treating tobacco use in youths. Finally, recommendations are made for the primary care clinician, professional organizations, and health care systems and policies. Pediatricians and other clinicians can and should play an important role in treating tobacco dependence in youths.