AMILCAR QUISPE ASTORGA

Mr. AMILCAR QUISPE ASTORGA

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 June 2025 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAMILCAR QUISPE ASTORGA
AMILCAR QUISPE ASTORGA
RCRoger Jesus Coaquira-Castillo
Roger Jesus Coaquira-Castillo
LML. Utrilla Mego
L. Utrilla Mego
JHJulio Cesar Herrera-Levano
Julio Cesar Herrera-Levano
YCYesenia Concha-Ramos
Yesenia Concha-Ramos
Edison Moreno-CardenasEdison Moreno-Cardenas
Edison Moreno-Cardenas
Precision air conditioning (PAC) systems are prone to various types of failures, leading to inefficiencies, increased energy consumption, and possible reductions in equipment performance. This study proposes an automatic real-time fault detection and diagnosis system. It classifies events as either faulty or normal by analyzing key status signals such as pressure, temperature, current, and voltage. This research is based on data-driven models and machine learning, where a specific strategy is proposed for five types of system failures. The work was carried out on a Rittal PAC, model SK3328.500 (cooling unit), installing capacitive pressure sensors, Hall effect current sensors, electromagnetic induction voltage sensors, infrared temperature sensors, and thermocouple-type sensors. For the implementation of the system, a dataset of PAC status signals was obtained, initially consisting of 31,057 samples after a preprocessing step using the Random Under-Sampler (RUS) module. A database with 20,000 samples was obtained, which includes normal and failed operating events generated in the PAC. The selection of the models is based on accuracy criteria, evaluated by testing in both offline (database) and real-time conditions. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model achieved 93%, Decision Tree (DT) 93%, Gradient Boosting (GB) 91%, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) 83%, and Naive Bayes (NB) 77%, while the Random Forest (RF) model stood out, having an accuracy of 96% in deferred tests and 95.28% in real-time. Finally, a validation test was performed with the best-selected model in real time, simulating a real environment for the PAC system, achieving an accuracy rate of 93.49%.