K. Lizama Allende

Dr. K. Lizama Allende

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2011 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KAK. Lizama Allende
K. Lizama Allende
TFTim D. Fletcher
Tim D. Fletcher
Guangzhi SunGuangzhi Sun
Guangzhi Sun

11 July 2020 in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJochen Bundschuh
Jochen Bundschuh
MAMARIA AURORA ARMIENTA
MARIA AURORA ARMIENTA
NMNury Morales-Simfors
Nury Morales-Simfors
Mohammad Ayaz AlamMohammad Ayaz Alam
Mohammad Ayaz Alam
DLDina L. López
Dina L. López
AAArslan Ahmad
Arslan Ahmad
Today (year 2020), the globally recognized problem of arsenic (As) contamination of water resources and other environments at toxic levels has been reported in all of the 20 Latin American countries. The present review indicates that As is prevalent in 200 areas across these countries. Arsenic is naturally released into the environment and mobilized from geogenic sources comprising: (i) volcanic rocks and emissions, the latter being transported over thousands of kilometers from the source, (ii) metallic mineral deposits, which get exposed to human beings and livestock through drinking water or food chain, and (iii) As-rich geothermal fluids ascending from deep geothermal reservoirs contaminate freshwater sources. The challenge for mitigation is increased manifold by mining and related activities, as As from mining sites is transported by rivers over long distances and even reaches and contaminates coastal environments. The recognition of the As problem by the authorities in several countries has led to various actions for remediation, but there is a lack of long-term strategies for such interventions. Often only total As concentration is reported, while data on As sources, mobilization, speciation, mobility and pathways are lacking which is imperative for assessing quality of any water source, i.e. public and private.

1 January 2012 in Chemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KAK. Lizama Allende
K. Lizama Allende
TFT.D. Fletcher
T.D. Fletcher
Guangzhi SunGuangzhi Sun
Guangzhi Sun

14 July 2018 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IAIgnacio Araneda
Ignacio Araneda
NTNatalia F. Tapia
Natalia F. Tapia
KAK. Lizama Allende
K. Lizama Allende
IVIgnacio Vargas
Ignacio Vargas
Greywater reuse through decentralized and low-cost treatment systems emerges as an opportunity to tackle the existing demand for water. In recent years, constructed wetlands (CW) systems and microbial fuel cells (MFCs) have emerged as attractive technologies for sustainable wastewater treatment. In this study, constructed wetland microbial fuel cells (CW-MFCs) planted with Phragmites australis were tested to evaluate the potential of combining these two systems for synthetic greywater treatment and energy recovery. Open (CW) and closed circuit (CW-MFCs) reactors were operated for 152 days to evaluate the effect of energy recovery on the removal of soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD), nutrients and total suspended solids (TSS). Results indicate no significant differences for sCOD and phosphate removal efficiencies. CW-MFCs and CW reactors presented sCOD removal efficiency of 91.7 ± 5.1% and 90 ± 10% and phosphate removal efficiencies of 56.3 ± 4.4% and 61.5 ± 3.5%, respectively. Nitrate removal efficiencies were higher in CW: 99.5 ± 1% versus 86.5 ± 7.1% in CW-MFCs, respectively. Energy generation reached a maximum power density of 33.52 ± 7.87 mW m−3 and 719.57 ± 67.67 mW m−3 at a poised anode potential of −150 mV vs. Ag/AgCl. Thus, our results suggest that the incorporation of MFC systems into constructed wetlands does allow energy recovery while providing effective greywater treatment.