For primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), laser treatment or surgery is used when the target intraocular pressure (IOP) cannot be achieved by pharmacological agents, such as prostaglandin (PG) analogs; these drugs also have varied effects. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 74 POAG patients (74 eyes) whose IOP was inadequately controlled by PG analogs (bimatoprost [13 eyes], latanoprost [34 eyes], tafluprost [11 eyes], and travoprost [16 eyes]) and underwent primary trabeculectomy. The proportion of patients with no recurrent IOP elevation within 24 months post-trabeculectomy was significantly (P < 0.001) lower in the bimatoprost group (31.3%) than in the latanoprost (83.2%), tafluprost (45.5%), or travoprost groups (65.6%). Deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus (DUES) was observed before trabeculectomy in 18 of 74 eyes (24.3%) treated with bimatoprost (9 eyes; 50.0%), latanoprost (3 eyes; 16.7%), tafluprost (1 eye; 5.5%) and travoprost (5 eyes; 27.8%). The proportion of patients with no recurrent IOP elevation up to 24 months post-trabeculectomy was significantly (P < 0.0001) lower in the DUES(+) group (34.7%) than in the DUES(-) group (74.3%). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis, with no recurrent IOP elevation used as dependent variable, and bimatoprost, latanoprost, travoprost, tafluprost, β-blocker, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, brimonidine, gender, age, preoperative IOP, mean deviation, duration of PG analog use before surgery, and the number of ophthalmic solutions used as independent variables, identified only bimatoprost as a significant independent factor (P = 0.0368). Thus, the outcome of trabeculectomy varied depending on the PG analog used preoperatively, and bimatoprost use was associated with a high risk of recurrent IOP elevation up to 2 years post-trabeculectomy. This may indicate that the incidence of DUES differed with the PG analog used. Patients with glaucoma who are treated with bimatoprost should be monitored for DUES, and when these patients undergo trabeculectomy, the postoperative course of IOP should be followed carefully.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to investigate the two-year continuous efficacy, risk factors, and safety profile of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in Japanese individuals diagnosed with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) who underwent SLT as either a first-line or second-line treatment. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with NTG who underwent SLT as either an initial or secondary therapy at 26 medical institutions in Japan between January 2020 and December 2021 with a 2-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was a reduction in the rate of intraocular pressure (IOP) over 2 years after SLT. To estimate the time-varying effect of IOP reduction, a linear mixed-effects model was employed. The secondary endpoints were numerical IOP reduction, treatment success rates shown by a Kaplan–Meier analysis, and complications. Success was defined as an outflow pressure improvement rate (ΔOP) ≥ 20% (definition A) or an IOP reduction rate ≥ 20% (definition B) without further treatment. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors to successful SLT treatment. The study was registered with UMIN-CTR (ID: UMIN R000064045). Results: A total of 230 eyes from 230 individuals participated in this study, with 148 eyes receiving SLT as an initial (first-line) therapy and 82 eyes undergoing SLT as a secondary (second-line) intervention. In the first-line group, the mean IOP dropped from 16.7 ± 2.3 mmHg to 13.7 ± 2.4 mmHg at two years post-treatment, reflecting a 16.8% reduction. In the second-line group, the average IOP declined from 15.9 ± 2.5 mmHg to 13.2 ± 2.0 mmHg, marking a 14.4% decrease over the same period. The treatment success rate according to definition A (ΔOP ≥ 20%) was 73.7% at 2 years. Analysis using a linear mixed-effects model identified time (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.044), baseline IOP (p < 0.001), and central corneal thickness (CCT) (p < 0.001) as statistically significant contributors to IOP reduction following SLT. However, neither the Group (first-line vs. second-line) variable (p = 0.386) nor the Time × Group interaction (p = 0.298) reached statistical significance. A lower baseline IOP and a thicker CCT were confirmed as significant predictors of SLT treatment failure. Conclusions: Both initial and secondary SLT treatments for NTG proved to be effective and safe over a two-year period, although the extent of IOP reduction was smaller in cases with a lower baseline IOP. Our findings indicate that the IOP-lowering effect of SLT in NTG is influenced by pretreatment IOP levels, aligning with previous studies on primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. However, in contrast to those earlier findings, our research identified pretreatment central corneal thickness as a statistically significant factor influencing SLT efficacy in NTG. These results support the role of SLT as a reliable and safe therapeutic option for managing NTG.