With the introduction of large-scale molecular profiling methods and high-throughput sequencing technologies, the genomic features of most lymphoid neoplasms have been characterized at an unprecedented scale. Although the principles for the classification and diagnosis of these disorders, founded on a multidimensional definition of disease entities, have been consolidated over the past 25 years, novel genomic data have markedly enhanced our understanding of lymphomagenesis and enriched the description of disease entities at the molecular level. Yet, the current diagnosis of lymphoid tumors is largely based on morphological assessment and immunophenotyping, with only few entities being defined by genomic criteria. This paper, which accompanies the International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms, will address how established assays and newly developed technologies for molecular testing already complement clinical diagnoses and provide a novel lens on disease classification. More specifically, their contributions to diagnosis refinement, risk stratification, and therapy prediction will be considered for the main categories of lymphoid neoplasms. The potential of whole-genome sequencing, circulating tumor DNA analyses, single-cell analyses, and epigenetic profiling will be discussed because these will likely become important future tools for implementing precision medicine approaches in clinical decision making for patients with lymphoid malignancies.

PURPOSE: Lenalidomide combined with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) (R2CHOP) in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has shown promising activity, particularly in the activated B-cell–like (ABC) subtype. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-ACRIN trial E1412 was a randomized phase II study comparing R2CHOP versus R-CHOP in untreated DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, stage II bulky-IV disease, International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≥ 2, and ECOG performance status ≤ 2 were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to R2CHOP versus R-CHOP for six cycles. Tumors were analyzed using the NanoString Lymph2Cx for cell of origin. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in all patients with the co-primary end point of PFS in ABC-DLBCL. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Three hundred forty-nine patients were enrolled; 280 patients (145 R2CHOP and 135 R-CHOP) were evaluable: 94 were ABC-DLBCL, 122 germinal center B-cell–like-DLBCL, 18 unclassifiable, and 46 unknowns. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between arms, and the median age was 66 (range, 24-92); 70% of patients had stage IV disease; 34%, 43%, and 24% had IPI 2, 3, and 4 or 5, respectively. Myelosuppression was more common in the R2CHOP arm. The ORR and CR rate were 92% and 68% in R-CHOP and 97% ( P = .06) and 73% ( P = .43) in the R2CHOP arm, respectively. The median follow-up was 3.0 years; R2CHOP was associated with a 34% reduction in risk of progression or death versus R-CHOP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.01) and 3-year PFS of 73% versus 61%, one-sided P = .03, and an improvement in OS (83% and 75% at 3 years; HR, 0.67; one-sided P = .05). The PFS HR for R2CHOP was 0.67 for ABC-DLBCL, one-sided P = .1. CONCLUSION: In this signal-seeking study, the addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP (R2CHOP) improved outcomes in newly diagnosed DLBCL including patients with ABC-DLBCL.

Objectives: Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) with non–immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraproteinemia remains poorly understood. The goal of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features of LPL in the bone marrow in patients with immunoglobulin G (IgG) or immunoglobulin A (IgA) paraproteins and evaluate MYD88 L265P mutation status to determine the relationship of these cases to Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Methods: Bone marrows from LPL cases with IgG or IgA paraproteins diagnosed between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2014, were retrieved from the clinical archive. Clinicopathologic features were retrospectively reviewed. MYD88 L265P mutation status was assessed by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction prospectively on all cases. Results: Of 27 cases, four were reclassified as multiple myeloma, all MYD88 mutation negative. MYD88 L265P mutations were present in 10 (43%) of 23 remaining cases. No association between MYD88 status and bone marrow morphologic or phenotypic features, including the presence of Dutcher bodies, mast cells, expression of CD19 by plasma cells, or hemosiderin, was identified, although these features were present in a subset of cases, similar to WM. Clinical features of WM such as hyperviscosity were uncommon in this group and did not correlate with MYD88 status. Conclusions: Non-IgM LPLs are a clinically and pathologically heterogeneous group and often harbor MYD88 L265P mutation, albeit at a lower rate than classic WM. MYD88 status does not correlate with any specific pathologic or clinical manifestations.