Gareth Barnes

Dr. Gareth Barnes

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBElena Boto
Elena Boto
NHNiall Holmes
Niall Holmes
JLJames Leggett
James Leggett
GRGillian Roberts
Gillian Roberts
VSVishal Shah
Vishal Shah
MBMatthew J. Brookes
Matthew J. Brookes

19 September 2011 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMatthew J. Brookes
Matthew J. Brookes
MWMark Woolrich
Mark Woolrich
HLHenry Luckhoo
Henry Luckhoo
DPDarren Price
Darren Price
JHJoanne R. Hale
Joanne R. Hale
PMPeter G. Morris
Peter G. Morris
In recent years the study of resting state brain networks (RSNs) has become an important area of neuroimaging. The majority of studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure temporal correlation between blood-oxygenation-level–dependent (BOLD) signals from different brain areas. However, BOLD is an indirect measure related to hemodynamics, and the electrophysiological basis of connectivity between spatially separate network nodes cannot be comprehensively assessed using this technique. In this paper we describe a means to characterize resting state brain networks independently using magnetoencephalography (MEG), a neuroimaging modality that bypasses the hemodynamic response and measures the magnetic fields associated with electrophysiological brain activity. The MEG data are analyzed using a unique combination of beamformer spatial filtering and independent component analysis (ICA) and require no prior assumptions about the spatial locations or patterns of the networks. This method results in RSNs with significant similarity in their spatial structure compared with RSNs derived independently using fMRI. This outcome confirms the neural basis of hemodynamic networks and demonstrates the potential of MEG as a tool for understanding the mechanisms that underlie RSNs and the nature of connectivity that binds network nodes.

1 January 2013 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JGJoachim Gross
Joachim Gross
SBSylvain Baillet
Sylvain Baillet
GBGareth Barnes
Gareth Barnes
RHRichard N Henson
Richard N Henson
AHArjan Hillebrand
Arjan Hillebrand
JSJan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings are a rich source of information about the neural dynamics underlying cognitive processes in the brain, with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution. In recent years there have been considerable advances in MEG hardware developments and methods. Sophisticated analysis techniques are now routinely applied and continuously improved, leading to fascinating insights into the intricate dynamics of neural processes. However, the rapidly increasing level of complexity of the different steps in a MEG study make it difficult for novices, and sometimes even for experts, to stay aware of possible limitations and caveats. Furthermore, the complexity of MEG data acquisition and data analysis requires special attention when describing MEG studies in publications, in order to facilitate interpretation and reproduction of the results. This manuscript aims at making recommendations for a number of important data acquisition and data analysis steps and suggests details that should be specified in manuscripts reporting MEG studies. These recommendations will hopefully serve as guidelines that help to strengthen the position of the MEG research community within the field of neuroscience, and may foster discussion in order to further enhance the quality and impact of MEG research.

1 January 2011 in Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VLVladimir Litvak
Vladimir Litvak
JMJérémie MATTOUT
Jérémie MATTOUT
SKStefan Kiebel
Stefan Kiebel
CPChristophe Phillips
Christophe Phillips
RHRichard Henson
Richard Henson
KFKarl Friston Friston
Karl Friston Friston
SPM is a free and open source software written in MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc.). In addition to standard M/EEG preprocessing, we presently offer three main analysis tools: (i) statistical analysis of scalp-maps, time-frequency images, and volumetric 3D source reconstruction images based on the general linear model, with correction for multiple comparisons using random field theory; (ii) Bayesian M/EEG source reconstruction, including support for group studies, simultaneous EEG and MEG, and fMRI priors; (iii) dynamic causal modelling (DCM), an approach combining neural modelling with data analysis for which there are several variants dealing with evoked responses, steady state responses (power spectra and cross-spectra), induced responses, and phase coupling. SPM8 is integrated with the FieldTrip toolbox , making it possible for users to combine a variety of standard analysis methods with new schemes implemented in SPM and build custom analysis tools using powerful graphical user interface (GUI) and batching tools.

1 June 2011 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMatthew J. Brookes
Matthew J. Brookes
JHJoanne R. Hale
Joanne R. Hale
JZJohanna Zumer
Johanna Zumer
CSClaire M. Stevenson
Claire M. Stevenson
SFSusan Francis
Susan Francis
SNSrikantan S. Nagarajan
Srikantan S. Nagarajan
Functional connectivity (FC) between brain regions is thought to be central to the way in which the brain processes information. Abnormal connectivity is thought to be implicated in a number of diseases. The ability to study FC is therefore a key goal for neuroimaging. Functional connectivity (fc) MRI has become a popular tool to make connectivity measurements but the technique is limited by its indirect nature. A multimodal approach is therefore an attractive means to investigate the electrodynamic mechanisms underlying hemodynamic connectivity. In this paper, we investigate resting state FC using fcMRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG). In fcMRI, we exploit the advantages afforded by ultra high magnetic field. In MEG we apply envelope correlation and coherence techniques to source space projected MEG signals. We show that beamforming provides an excellent means to measure FC in source space using MEG data. However, care must be taken when interpreting these measurements since cross talk between voxels in source space can potentially lead to spurious connectivity and this must be taken into account in all studies of this type. We show good spatial agreement between FC measured independently using MEG and fcMRI; FC between sensorimotor cortices was observed using both modalities, with the best spatial agreement when MEG data are filtered into the β band. This finding helps to reduce the potential confounds associated with each modality alone: while it helps reduce the uncertainties in spatial patterns generated by MEG (brought about by the ill posed inverse problem), addition of electrodynamic metric confirms the neural basis of fcMRI measurements. Finally, we show that multiple MEG based FC metrics allow the potential to move beyond what is possible using fcMRI, and investigate the nature of electrodynamic connectivity. Our results extend those from previous studies and add weight to the argument that neural oscillations are intimately related to functional connectivity and the BOLD response.

21 April 2005 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHArjan Hillebrand
Arjan Hillebrand
KSKrish D. Singh
Krish D. Singh
IHIan E. Holliday
Ian E. Holliday
PFPaul L. Furlong
Paul L. Furlong
GBGareth Barnes
Gareth Barnes