Tiffany Brown

Ms. Tiffany Brown


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 September 2015 in Cancer Causes & Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDavid W. Baker
David W. Baker
TBTiffany Brown
Tiffany Brown
SGShira N. Goldman
Shira N. Goldman
DLDavid T. Liss
David T. Liss
SKStephanie Kollar
Stephanie Kollar
DBDavid R. Buchanan
David R. Buchanan

6 January 2022 in Journal of General Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPStephen D. Persell
Stephen D. Persell
TBTiffany Brown
Tiffany Brown
JDJason N. Doctor
Jason N. Doctor
CFCraig R. Fox
Craig R. Fox
NGNoah J. Goldstein
Noah J. Goldstein
MFMark W. Friedberg
Mark W. Friedberg

1 March 2016
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDiana S Sandler
Diana S Sandler
EREric M Ruderman
Eric M Ruderman
TBTiffany Brown
Tiffany Brown
JLJi Young Lee
Ji Young Lee
AMAmanda Mixon
Amanda Mixon
DBDavid W Baker
David W Baker

29 April 2013 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDavid W Baker
David W Baker
TBTiffany Brown
Tiffany Brown
DBDavid R Buchanan
David R Buchanan
JWJordan Weil
Jordan Weil
KCKenzie A Cameron
Kenzie A Cameron
MWMichael S Wolf
Michael S Wolf
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common and leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Although screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) or endoscopy has been shown to decrease CRC mortality, screening rates remain suboptimal. Screening rates are particularly low for people with low incomes and members of underrepresented minority groups. FOBT should be done annually to detect CRC early and to reduce CRC mortality, but this often does not occur. This paper describes the design of a multifaceted intervention to increase long-term adherence to FOBT among poor, predominantly Latino patients, and the design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of this intervention compared to usual care.

1 May 2017 in Patient Education and Counseling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBTiffany Brown
Tiffany Brown
SGShira N. Goldman
Shira N. Goldman
SPStephen D. Persell
Stephen D. Persell
JLJi Young Lee
Ji Young Lee
CDCrystal T. Doan
Crystal T. Doan
KCKenzie A. Cameron
Kenzie A. Cameron

4 November 2022 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adriana GuzmanAdriana Guzman
Adriana Guzman
TBTiffany Brown
Tiffany Brown
JLJi Young Lee
Ji Young Lee
MFMichael A. Fischer
Michael A. Fischer
MFMark W. Friedberg
Mark W. Friedberg
JLJeffrey A Linder
Jeffrey A Linder
Ambulatory antibiotic stewards, researchers, and performance measurement programs choose different durations to associate diagnoses with antibiotic prescriptions. We assessed how the apparent appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing changes when using different look-back and look-forward periods. Examining durations of 0 days (same-day), −3 days, −7 days, −30 days, ±3 days, ±7 days, and ±30 days, we classified all ambulatory antibiotic prescriptions in the electronic health record of an integrated health care system from 2016 to 2019 (714,057 prescriptions to 348,739 patients by 2391 clinicians) as chronic, appropriate, potentially appropriate, inappropriate, or not associated with any diagnosis. Overall, 16% percent of all prescriptions were classified as chronic infection related. Using only same-day diagnoses, appropriate, potentially appropriate, inappropriate, and not-associated antibiotics, accounted for 14%, 36%, 22%, and 11% of prescriptions, respectively. As the duration of association increased, the proportion of appropriate antibiotics stayed the same (range, 14% to 18%), potentially appropriate antibiotics increased (e.g., 43% for −30 days), inappropriate stayed the same (range, 22% to 24%), and not-associated antibiotics decreased (e.g., 2% for −30 days). Using the longest look-back-and-forward duration (±30 days), appropriate, potentially appropriate, inappropriate, and not-associated antibiotics, accounted for 18%, 44%, 20%, and 2% of prescriptions, respectively. Ambulatory programs and studies focused on appropriate or inappropriate antibiotic prescribing can reasonably use a short duration of association between an antibiotic prescription and diagnosis codes. Programs and studies focused on potentially appropriate antibiotic prescribing might consider examining longer durations.