Naota Hanasaki

Dr. Naota Hanasaki

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2017 in Earth's Future
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJunguo Liu
Junguo Liu
HYHong Yang
Hong Yang
SGSimon Gosling
Simon Gosling
MKMatti Kummu
Matti Kummu
MFMartina Flörke
Martina Flörke
TOTaikan Oki
Taikan Oki
Water scarcity has become a major constraint to socio‐economic development and a threat to livelihood in increasing parts of the world. Since the late 1980s, water scarcity research has attracted much political and public attention. We here review a variety of indicators that have been developed to capture different characteristics of water scarcity. Population, water availability, and water use are the key elements of these indicators. Most of the progress made in the last few decades has been on the quantification of water availability and use by applying spatially explicit models. However, challenges remain on appropriate incorporation of green water (soil moisture), water quality, environmental flow requirements, globalization, and virtual water trade in water scarcity assessment. Meanwhile, inter‐ and intra‐annual variability of water availability and use also calls for assessing the temporal dimension of water scarcity. It requires concerted efforts of hydrologists, economists, social scientists, and environmental scientists to develop integrated approaches to capture the multi‐faceted nature of water scarcity.

11 January 2021 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YPYadu Pokhrel
Yadu Pokhrel
FFFarshid Felfelani
Farshid Felfelani
YSYusuke Satoh
Yusuke Satoh
JBJulien Boulange
Julien Boulange
PBPeter Burek
Peter Burek
YWYoshihide Wada
Yoshihide Wada

19 November 2018 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMCamilo Mora
Camilo Mora
DSDaniele Spirandelli
Daniele Spirandelli
EFErik C. Franklin
Erik C. Franklin
JLJohn Lynham
John Lynham
MKMichael Kantar
Michael Kantar
CHCynthia L. Hunter
Cynthia L. Hunter

21 January 2016 in Geoscientific Model Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWY. Wada
Y. Wada
MFMartina Flörke
Martina Flörke
NHNaota Hanasaki
Naota Hanasaki
SES. Eisner
S. Eisner
GFG. Fischer
G. Fischer
DWD. Wiberg
D. Wiberg
To sustain growing food demand and increasing standard of living, global water use increased by nearly 6 times during the last 100 years, and continues to grow. As water demands get closer and closer to the water availability in many regions, each drop of water becomes increasingly valuable and water must be managed more efficiently and intensively. However, soaring water use worsens water scarcity conditions already prevalent in semi-arid and arid regions, increasing uncertainty for sustainable food production and economic development. Planning for future development and investments requires that we prepare water projections for the future. However, estimations are complicated because the future of the world's waters will be influenced by a combination of environmental, social, economic, and political factors, and there is only limited knowledge and data available about freshwater resources and how they are being used. The Water Futures and Solutions (WFaS) initiative coordinates its work with other ongoing scenario efforts for the sake of establishing a consistent set of new global water scenarios based on the shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs) and the representative concentration pathways (RCPs). The WFaS "fast-track" assessment uses three global water models, namely H08, PCR-GLOBWB, and WaterGAP. This study assesses the state of the art for estimating and projecting water use regionally and globally in a consistent manner. It provides an overview of different approaches, the uncertainty, strengths and weaknesses of the various estimation methods, types of management and policy decisions for which the current estimation methods are useful. We also discuss additional information most needed to be able to improve water use estimates and be able to assess a greater range of management options across the water–energy–climate nexus.

29 July 2008 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NHNaota Hanasaki
Naota Hanasaki
SKShinjiro Kanae
Shinjiro Kanae
TOT. Oki
T. Oki
KMK. Masuda
K. Masuda
KMK. Motoya
K. Motoya
KTK. Tanaka
K. Tanaka
To assess global water availability and use at a subannual timescale, an integrated global water resources model was developed consisting of six modules: land surface hydrology, river routing, crop growth, reservoir operation, environmental flow requirement estimation, and anthropogenic water withdrawal. The model simulates both natural and anthropogenic water flow globally (excluding Antarctica) on a daily basis at a spatial resolution of 1°×1° (longitude and latitude). This first part of the two-feature report describes the six modules and the input meteorological forcing. The input meteorological forcing was provided by the second Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP2), an international land surface modeling project. Several reported shortcomings of the forcing component were improved. The land surface hydrology module was developed based on a bucket type model that simulates energy and water balance on land surfaces. The crop growth module is a relatively simple model based on concepts of heat unit theory, potential biomass, and a harvest index. In the reservoir operation module, 452 major reservoirs with >1 km3 each of storage capacity store and release water according to their own rules of operation. Operating rules were determined for each reservoir by an algorithm that used currently available global data such as reservoir storage capacity, intended purposes, simulated inflow, and water demand in the lower reaches. The environmental flow requirement module was newly developed based on case studies from around the world. Simulated runoff was compared and validated with observation-based global runoff data sets and observed streamflow records at 32 major river gauging stations around the world. Mean annual runoff agreed well with earlier studies at global and continental scales, and in individual basins, the mean bias was less than ±20% in 14 of the 32 river basins and less than ±50% in 24 basins. The error in the peak was less than ±1 mo in 19 of the 27 basins and less than ±2 mo in 25 basins. The performance was similar to the best available precedent studies with closure of energy and water. The input meteorological forcing component and the integrated model provide a framework with which to assess global water resources, with the potential application to investigate the subannual variability in water resources.

26 January 2021 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MVMichelle T H van Vliet
Michelle T H van Vliet
EJEdward R Jones
Edward R Jones
MFMartina Flörke
Martina Flörke
WFWietse H P Franssen
Wietse H P Franssen
NHNaota Hanasaki
Naota Hanasaki
JYJohn Yearsley
John Yearsley
Water scarcity threatens people in various regions, and has predominantly been studied from a water quantity perspective only. Here we show that global water scarcity is driven by both water quantity and water quality issues, and quantify expansions in clean water technologies (i.e. desalination and treated wastewater reuse) to ‘reduce the number of people suffering from water scarcity’ as urgently required by UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 6. Including water quality (i.e. water temperature, salinity, organic pollution and nutrients) contributes to an increase in percentage of world’s population currently suffering from severe water scarcity from an annual average of 30% (22%–35% monthly range; water quantity only) to 40% (31%–46%; both water quantity and quality). Water quality impacts are in particular high in severe water scarcity regions, such as in eastern China and India. In these regions, excessive sectoral water withdrawals do not only contribute to water scarcity from a water quantity perspective, but polluted return flows degrade water quality, exacerbating water scarcity. We show that expanding desalination (from 2.9 to 13.6 billion m3month−1) and treated wastewater uses (from 1.6 to 4.0 billion m3month−1) can strongly reduce water scarcity levels and the number of people affected, especially in Asia, although the side effects (e.g. brine, energy demand, economic costs) must be considered. The presented results have potential for follow-up integrated analyses accounting for technical and economic constraints of expanding desalination and treated wastewater reuse across the world.