Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh

Dr. Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh

Musculoskeltal Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AJAkram Jamali
Akram Jamali
Ebrahim Sadeghi-DemnehEbrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
NFNiloufar Fereshtenajad
Niloufar Fereshtenajad
SHSusan Hillier
Susan Hillier

15 March 2013 in Clinical Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STSarah F. Tyson
Sarah F. Tyson
Ebrahim Sadeghi-DemnehEbrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
CNChristopher J Nester
Christopher J Nester
Objective: To investigate the feasibility and potential efficacy of ‘activeTENS’ (that is transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) during everyday activities) by assessing the immediate effects on strength, proprioception, balance/falls risk and mobility after stroke. Design: A paired-sample randomized cross-over trial. Subjects: Twenty-nine mobile chronic stroke survivors with no pre-existing conditions limiting balance or mobility or contra-indications to TENS. Setting: University clinical research facility. Intervention: A single session of ‘activeTENS’ delivered via a ‘sock electrode’ (70–130 Hz, five second cycle) plus a session of control treatment (wearing the sock electrode with no stimulation), lasting approximately two hours in total. Main Outcomes: Dorsiflexor and plantarflexor strength and proprioception using an isokinetic dyanometer, balance and falls risk (Standing Forward Reach Test) and gait speed (10-m walk test). Results: All participants tolerated ‘active TENS’. Most parameters improved during stimulation with activeTENS; balance (p = 0.009), gait speed (p = 0.002), plantarflexor strength (p = 0.008) and proprioception of plantarflexion (p = 0.029), except dorsiflexor strength (p = 0.194) and dorsiflexion proprioception (p = 0.078). Conclusions: The results provide initial evidence of the potential of ‘active TENS’ to benefit physical function after stroke which warrants further phase II trials to develop the intervention. Concerns that stimulation could have a detrimental impact on balance and increase risk of falls were not supported.

1 June 2009 in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FJFahimeh Sadat Jafarian
Fahimeh Sadat Jafarian
Ebrahim Sadeghi-DemnehEbrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
STSarah F. Tyson
Sarah F. Tyson
Controlled laboratory study using a randomized crossover design. To determine the immediate effect of 3 common types of orthoses (2 elbow counterforce orthoses and a wrist splint) on grip strength in individuals with lateral epicondylosis. Lateral epicondylosis is a common cause of pain and upper limb dysfunction. Although the effectiveness of orthoses has been reported, comparisons of effectiveness among orthoses are limited. Fifty-two subjects with lateral epicondylosis were recruited (20 men, 32 women; mean +/- SD age, 41 +/- 8 years). Maximum and pain-free grip strength were assessed using a digital hand grip dynamometer immediately after the application of each orthosis. The 4 testing conditions included a placebo orthosis as a control condition, an elbow strap orthosis, an elbow sleeve orthosis, and a wrist splint. Data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance for each outcome measure. Pain-free grip-strength was greater when using the elbow strap or the elbow sleeve orthosis compared to when using the placebo control orthosis or the wrist splint (P<.02), but there was no difference between the elbow sleeve and strap orthoses (P>.05), nor between the wrist splint and placebo orthosis (P>.05). Maximum grip strength was less when using the wrist splint compared to when tested with the elbow sleeve or the elbow strap (P< or =.003). Use of the elbow strap, elbow sleeve, or wrist splint did not change maximum grip strength compared to the control placebo orthosis condition (P>.05). There was also no difference in maximum grip strength between the elbow strap and the elbow sleeve conditions (P>.05). The use of the 2 types of elbow orthoses (strap and sleeve) resulted in an immediate increase in pain-free grip strength. No differences between the 2 orthoses were found, suggesting that either can be used. A wrist splint produced no immediate change in pain-free or maximum grip-strength, indicating that it should not be used as a first-choice orthosis based on those outcome measures.

29 March 2015 in Foot & Ankle Specialist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ebrahim Sadeghi-DemnehEbrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
FJFahimehsadat Jafarian
Fahimehsadat Jafarian
JMJonathan M. A. Melvin
Jonathan M. A. Melvin
FAFatemeh Azadinia
Fatemeh Azadinia
FSFatemeh Shamsi
Fatemeh Shamsi
MJMohamad Jafarpishe
Mohamad Jafarpishe
Background. Flatfoot has been shown to cause abnormal stresses on the foot and lower extremity. The altered mechanical stresses on these structures can aggravate the foot deformity. Screening of the flatfoot and its associated factors helps detect underlying risks influencing the stresses on the foot. The purpose of this study was to analyze the structure of the medial foot arch and investigate its associated factors in students, aged 7 to 14 years. Methods. Multistage cluster sampling was used and each cluster included 2 other random sampling levels. A total of 667 Iranian school children were recruited and their feet were bilaterally evaluated using a static footprint while standing in a fully weightbearing position. The footprint, an observational measurement, and a questionnaire were used for the foot assessment. Results. The prevalence of flatfoot was 17.1% in the population studied. There was no gender difference but the prevalence of flatfoot did decrease with age. The significant differences were observed in the prevalence of flatfoot between normal-weight, overweight, and obese groups (P < .01); more overweight participants had flatter feet. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that development of the longitudinal plantar arch in school-age children is influenced by age and weight. Age and weight were the primary predictive factors of flatfoot. Levels of Evidence: Prognostic, Level IV: Case series

7 December 2015 in Clinical Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ebrahim Sadeghi-DemnehEbrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
FAFatemeh Azadinia
Fatemeh Azadinia
FJF. Jafarian
F. Jafarian
FSF. Shamsi
F. Shamsi
JMJ. M. A. Melvin
J. M. A. Melvin
ZRZ. Rezaeian
Z. Rezaeian

1 December 2018 in The Foot
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ebrahim Sadeghi-DemnehEbrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
JMJonathan M.A. Melvin
Jonathan M.A. Melvin
KMKaren Mickle
Karen Mickle