Lihong Zeng

Ms. Lihong Zeng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LZLihong Zeng
Lihong Zeng
HLHonghui Li
Honghui Li
XFXueliang Fu
Xueliang Fu
DHDaoqi Han
Daoqi Han
SZShuncheng Zhou
Shuncheng Zhou
XHXin He
Xin He
In the highly interconnected digital ecosystem, cyberspace has become the main battlefield for complex attacks such as Advanced Persistent Threat (APT). The complexity and concealment of APT attacks are increasing, posing unprecedented challenges to network security. Current APT detection methods largely depend on general datasets, making it challenging to capture the stages and complexity of APT attacks. Moreover, existing detection methods often suffer from suboptimal accuracy, high false alarm rates, and a lack of real-time capabilities. In this paper, we introduce LDR-RFECV, a novel feature selection (FS) algorithm that uses LightGBM, Decision Trees (DTs), and Random Forest (RF) as integrated feature evaluators instead of single evaluators in recursive feature elimination algorithms. This approach helps select the optimal feature subset, thereby significantly enhancing detection efficiency. In addition, a novel optimization algorithm called LWHO was proposed, which integrates the Levy flight mechanism with the Wild Horse Optimizer (WHO) to optimize the hyperparameters of the LightGBM model, ultimately enhancing performance in APT attack detection. More importantly, this optimization strategy significantly boosts the detection rate during the lateral movement phase of APT attacks, a pivotal stage where attackers infiltrate key resources. Timely identification is essential for disrupting the attack chain and achieving precise defense. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves 97.31% and 98.32% accuracy on two typical APT attack datasets, DAPT2020 and Unraveled, respectively, which is 2.86% and 4.02% higher than the current research methods, respectively.