Laryngeal dystonia (LD), known or termed as spasmodic dysphonia, is a rare movement disorder with an unknown cause affecting the intrinsic laryngeal muscles. Neurophysiological studies point to perturbed inhibitory processes, while conventional genetic studies reveal fragments of genetic architecture in LD. The study’s aims are to (1) describe transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methodology for studying the functional integrity of the corticospinal tract by stimulating the primary motor cortex (M1) for laryngeal muscle representation and recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from laryngeal muscles; (2) evaluate the results of TMS studies investigating the cortical silent period (cSP) in LD; and (3) present the standard treatments of LD, as well as the results of new theoretical views and treatment approaches like repetitive TMS and laryngeal vibration over the laryngeal muscles as the recent research attempts in treatment of LD. Neurophysiological findings point to a shortened duration of cSP in adductor LD and altered cSP duration in abductor LD individuals. Future TMS studies could further investigate the role of cSP in relation to standard laryngological measures and treatment options. A better understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms might give new perspectives for the treatment of LD.

Focal laryngeal dystonia (LD) is a rare, idiopathic disease affecting the laryngeal musculature with an unknown cause and clinically presented as adductor LD or rarely as abductor LD. The most effective treatment options include the injection of botulinum toxin (BoNT) into the affected laryngeal muscle. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the patho-neuro-physiological and genetic background of LD, as well as the standard recommended therapy (BoNT) and pharmacological treatment options, and to discuss possible treatment perspectives using neuro-modulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and vibrotactile stimulation. The review will present two LD cases, patients with adductor and abductor LD, standard diagnostic procedure, treatments and achievement, and the results of cortical excitability mapping the primary motor cortex for the representation of the laryngeal muscles in the assessment of corticospinal and corticobulbar excitability.

The cortical silent period (cSP) is a period of electrical silence following a motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the electromyographic signal recorded from a muscle. The MEP can be elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex site corresponding with the muscle. The cSP reflects the intracortical inhibitory process mediated by GABA_A and GABA_B receptors. The study aimed to investigate the cSP in the cricothyroid (CT) muscle after applying e-field-navigated TMS over the laryngeal motor cortex (LMC) in healthy subjects. Then, a cSP as a neurophysiologic feature for laryngeal dystonia was observed. We applied a single-pulse e-field-navigated TMS to the LMC over both hemispheres with hook-wire electrodes positioned in the CT muscle in nineteen healthy participants, which triggered the elicitation of contralateral and ipsilateral corticobulbar MEPs. The subjects were engaged in a vocalization task, and then we assessed the following metrics: LMC intensity, peak-to-peak MEP amplitude in the CT muscle, and cSP duration. The results showed that the cSP duration from the contralateral CT muscle was distributed from 40 ms to 60.83 ms, and from the ipsilateral CT muscle, from 40 ms to 65.58 ms. Also, no significant difference was found between the contralateral and ipsilateral cSP duration (t(30) = 0.85, p = 0.40), MEP amplitude in the CT muscle (t(30) = 0.91, p = 0.36), and LMC intensity (t(30) = 1.20, p = 0.23). To conclude, the applied research protocol showed the feasibility of recording LMC corticobulbar MEPs and observing the cSP during vocalization in healthy participants. Furthermore, an understanding of neurophysiologic cSP features can be used to study the pathophysiology of neurological disorders that affect laryngeal muscles, such as laryngeal dystonia.

Background: Postoperative macular edema may limit visual recovery following cataract surgery. Although smoking is recognized as a risk factor for ocular inflammation, its impact on early postoperative macular morphology following cataract surgery has not been investigated. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 88 elderly patients undergoing elective cataract surgery in a single university teaching hospital. The patients were divided into long-term smokers and lifelong non-smokers. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to assess the central subfoveal thickness (CST), cube volume (CV), cube average thickness (CAT), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and cup-to-disk ratio (CDR) preoperatively and on the 1st, 7th, and 14th postoperative days (PODs). The phacoemulsification time and cumulative dissipated energy were recorded. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess group-by-time interactions, and multivariable regression, adjusted for baseline covariates, was employed for analyses. Results: Eighty patients were included in the final analysis. Smokers had significantly thinner baseline CST than non-smokers. Both groups showed early postoperative CST increases, but only smokers exhibited sustained and significantly greater increases in CV and CAT on POD 14 (CV Δ +0.30 mm³ vs. +0.04 mm³; p = 0.026; CAT Δ +6.5 µm vs. +1.2 µm; p = 0.037). The RNFL and CDR changes did not differ significantly at earlier timepoints. However, smokers showed a notably greater RNFL thickening on POD 14 (Δ +4.2 µm; p = 0.001). Smoking status remained the strongest independent predictor of these changes (p < 0.001), while phacoemulsification parameters showed no significant interaction effects. Conclusions: Cigarette consumption independently predicts pronounced postoperative macular and RNFL thickening after uncomplicated elective cataract surgery. These transient structural changes could complicate early glaucoma assessment and should be considered when interpreting postoperative OCT findings in smokers.

Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) remain the cornerstone of pharmacologic treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) because of their well-established anti-inflammatory efficacy and generally favorable benefit–risk profile. Nevertheless, concerns regarding local and systemic corticosteroid-related adverse events (AEs) continue to influence patient adherence, prescribing practices, and long-term treatment acceptance. In routine clinical practice, safety perception and corticosteroid-related concerns frequently influence adherence and formulation selection to a greater extent than differences in clinical efficacy, particularly in pediatric populations and in patients requiring prolonged continuous therapy. Differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, including systemic bioavailability, glucocorticoid receptor affinity, lipophilicity, protein binding, and extent of first-pass metabolism, are considered important safety profile determinants of currently available INCS formulations. Available evidence indicates that local AEs, particularly epistaxis, nasal irritation, dryness, and sensory discomfort, represent the most frequently reported treatment-related AEs across INCS formulations, although these events are generally mild, self-limiting, and infrequently treatment-limiting. Clinically significant structural nasal complications, including septal perforation or progressive mucosal injury, appear uncommon in currently available studies. Systemic AEs, including hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis suppression, ocular toxicity, growth impairment, or clinically meaningful effects on bone metabolism, have not been consistently demonstrated with currently used low-systemic-exposure formulations administered at recommended therapeutic doses. Although systemic glucocorticoid exposure has been associated with alterations in lipid metabolism, adipose tissue function, and metabolic homeostasis, currently available intranasal corticosteroids demonstrate minimal systemic exposure, making clinically relevant metabolic effects unlikely under recommended therapeutic conditions. Formulations such as mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, fluticasone furoate, and ciclesonide exhibit pharmacokinetic characteristics associated with minimal systemic exposure because of extensive first-pass metabolism and low oral bioavailability. Although substantial pharmacokinetic differences exist between currently available INCS formulations, direct comparative evidence demonstrating clinically meaningful superiority in systemic safety outcomes remains limited. Current evidence suggests that formulation-dependent differences are clinically more relevant with respect to local tolerability, sensory characteristics, patient preference, and long-term adherence than major systemic safety outcomes. Pediatric evidence is generally reassuring, although historical concerns regarding growth suppression associated with earlier corticosteroid formulations continue to influence clinical practice. Currently available evidence supports the use of modern INCS as effective and generally well-tolerated therapeutic options across adult and pediatric populations.