Cardiac hypertrophy is characterized by cardiac structural remodeling, fibrosis, microvascular rarefaction, and chronic inflammation. The heart is structurally organized by different cell types, including cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cells. These cells highly interact with each other by a number of paracrine or autocrine factors. Cell-cell communication is indispensable for cardiac development, but also plays a vital role in regulating cardiac response to damage. Although cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts are deemed as key regulators of hypertrophic stimulation, other cells, including endothelial cells, also exert important effects on cardiac hypertrophy. More particularly, endothelial cells are the most abundant cells in the heart, which make up the basic structure of blood vessels and are widespread around other cells in the heart, implicating the great and inbuilt advantage of intercellular crosstalk. Cardiac microvascular plexuses are essential for transport of liquids, nutrients, molecules and cells within the heart. Meanwhile, endothelial cell-mediated paracrine signals have multiple positive or negative influences on cardiac hypertrophy. However, a comprehensive discussion of these influences and consequences is required. This review aims to summarize the basic function of endothelial cells in angiogenesis, with an emphasis on angiogenic molecules under hypertrophic conditions. The secondary objective of the research is to fully discuss the key molecules involved in the intercellular crosstalk and the endothelial cell-mediated protective or detrimental effects on other cardiac cells. This review provides a more comprehensive understanding of the overall role of endothelial cells in cardiac hypertrophy and guides the therapeutic approaches and drug development of cardiac hypertrophy.

Chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy (infl-CMP) is a long-term sequela caused by the chronicity of acute myocarditis, especially fulminant myocarditis (FM). Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) may benefit these patients by inhibiting the excessive inflammatory response. In this multicenter, randomized trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of HCQ in patients with chronic infl-CMP after FM. The primary outcome of the trial was a composite of the cardiovascular outcomes of time to cardiovascular death or heart transplant, hospitalization for heart failure or recurrence of myocarditis, permanent pacemaker, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. Secondary outcomes were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular internal diastolic diameter (LVIDd), plasma levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) from baseline to 12 months. Fifty patients were randomized to receive HCQ combined with prednisolone (PDN) or PDN monotherapy for 12 months. Compared to PDN monotherapy, HCQ combined with PDN therapy reduced the primary composite outcome [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.11–0.71] and had significant changes in the increase of LVEF and the decrease of LVIDd, hs-cTnI, NT-proBNP, and hs-CRP in patients with infl-CMP. No serious drug-related adverse events were recorded in either group, indicating an acceptable safety profile. Furthermore, HCQ combined with PDN significantly reduced the levels of 16 plasma cytokines to levels comparable to healthy controls. Twelve months of HCQ combined with PDN therapy significantly improved the prognosis and heart function, inhibited inflammation, and had acceptable safety in patients with infl-CMP after FM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05961202. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-025-04301-w.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a complex clinical syndrome characterized by limited therapeutic options, which are largely due to its intricate pathophysiology. The role of mechanical stress is pivotal in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis; conversely, its dysregulation may precipitate the progression of cardiovascular diseases. In HFpEF, both macroscopic structural alterations and intricate molecular processes might be influenced by mechanical stress. This review examines the potential associations between mechanical stress and HFpEF, exploring the pathophysiological underpinnings to the effects of mechanotransduction effectors on cardiac remodeling and the progression of heart failure, providing novel insights into the pathological mechanisms of HFpEF. Therapeutic strategies targeting these mechanotransduction effectors have shown promise in mitigating pathological cardiac remodeling in models of metabolic-associated heart failure, underscoring their potential as innovative treatments for HFpEF. Considering the clinical heterogeneity of HFpEF, it is imperative to pursue phenotype-specific personalized treatments to optimize therapeutic efficacy.