Although manifold empirical studies have identified the mechanical properties of crumb rubber concrete (CRC), a comparative analysis of economic and environmental benefits between CRC and ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPCC) is not explored. In this paper, a quantitative meta-analysis between CRC and OPCC is conducted to explore optimized design strength, and a comparative analysis of the economic and environmental benefits of the two materials is undertaken. Considering cost price as the economic index and CO2 emissions per cubic meter of concrete as the environmental index in the materialization stage, CRC and OPCC were compared with different mix designs to achieve grades of similar strengths. Upon replacing less than 20% of natural fine aggregates in concrete with crumb rubber, while retaining the cement content, an increase of 6% in the cost price was achieved for CRC with 30–40 MPa strength grade. Apart from the aspect of mining and transportation of natural aggregates, the reduction of CO2 emissions by means of CRC adoption was verified in the treatment process of waste tire incineration. The results show that CO2 emissions from CRC decreased by 15–17% when compared with OPCC for 30~40 MPa grade concrete. The research conclusion can serve as a theoretical basis for the engineering application of CRC with the same strength, and make certain contributions to the industrial application of crumb rubber aggregates and the sustainable treatment of waste tires.
Coal gangue concrete (CGC), a recycled cementitious material derived from industrial solid waste, presents both opportunities and challenges for structural applications due to its heterogeneous composition and variable mechanical behavior. This study develops an ensemble learning framework—incorporating XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost—to predict four key constitutive parameters based on experimental data. The predicted parameters are subsequently incorporated into an ABAQUS finite element model to simulate the compressive–bending response of CGC columns, with simulation results aligning well with experimental observations in terms of failure mode, load development, and deformation characteristics. To enhance model interpretability, a hybrid approach is adopted, combining permutation-based global feature importance analysis with SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)-derived local explanations. This joint framework captures both the overall influence of each feature and its context-dependent effects, revealing a three-stage stiffness evolution pattern—brittle, quasi-ductile, and re-brittle—governed by gangue replacement levels and consistent with micromechanical mechanisms and numerical responses. Coupled feature interactions, such as between gangue content and crush index, are shown to exacerbate stiffness loss through interfacial weakening and pore development. This integrated approach delivers both predictive accuracy and mechanistic transparency, providing a reference for developing physically interpretable, data-driven constitutive models and offering guidance for tailoring CGC toward ductile, energy-absorbing structural materials in seismic and sustainability-focused engineering.
In view of the adverse effect of the failure mode of the “strong beam and weak column” at the top-layer joint of subway stations on structural seismic performance under high axial compression ratio, a novel assembled steel–concrete composite (ASCC) beam–column joint for the top-layer is proposed in this paper, and its seismic performance is studied through cyclic loading tests and finite element analysis. The findings indicate that, in comparison to the reinforced concrete joint, the yield bearing capacity, ultimate bearing capacity, and ductility of the ASCC joint exhibit increases of approximately 46%, 13% and 40%, respectively, demonstrating superior seismic performance and a “strong column and weak beam” failure mode of the ASCC joint. The impact of parameters including the steel tube thickness, length of the lower steel tube, high axial compression ratio, and bolt quantity on the seismic performance of ASCC joints was further examined using a validated finite element model. Parametric investigations reveal that the ASCC joints with greater steel tube thickness, longer length of lower steel tube, and more bolts demonstrate significant improvements in load-bearing capacity, lateral displacement resistance, and energy dissipation capacity. A value of 0.80 can be recommended as the new high axial compression ratio upper limit of the current code. It is suggested that under the proposed new high axial compression ratio upper limit, the steel tube thickness should be 1–2% of the column diameter, while the length of the lower steel tube should be 1/3 of the length of the lower column, with more bolts restricting the deformation of the extended plates as the design and construction of joints better suit practical engineering applications.