Georgios Kofos

Mr. Georgios Kofos

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 November 2025 in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GKGeorgios Kofos
Georgios Kofos
AFAnastasia Fardi
Anastasia Fardi
TLTheodoros Lillis
Theodoros Lillis
IFIoannis Fotopoulos
Ioannis Fotopoulos
NDNickolaos Dabarakis
Nickolaos Dabarakis
Aims and Objectives: This cross‐sectional study aims to compare the accuracy, precision and clarity of responses to dental implant questions from three artificial intelligence (AI) models: ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT‐4), Gemini (Google) and MedGebra. Materials and Methods: 56 questions from an EAO patient guide were used and responses from each AI system were evaluated independently by two oral surgery specialists using a four‐point Likert scale for correctness, precision and clarity. Results: ChatGPT consistently scored highest especially in clarity with perfect marks from both evaluators. Gemini ranked lower in accuracy and precision but exhibited similar clarity. MedGebra received the lowest ratings on all criteria. Though consistency generally remained excellent, the inter‐rater reliability study revealed some variance in agreement levels between two examiners. Conclusion: ChatGPT and Gemini provided more accurate and informative responses on dental implants questions compared to MedGebra. According to the findings of the present study AI chatbots have potential for enhancing patient education on dental implants but professional oversight is crucial for ensuring accuracy and reliability. The study highlights the promising and potential benefits of large language models (LLMs) in dental patient education.