Focus Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS) performed by internal medicine residents on call with 2 h of training can provide a means for ruling out cardiac disease, but with poor sensitivity. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness as well as diagnostic accuracy of FoCUS following 4 h of training. All residents on call were given a 4-h training course with an additional one-hour training course after 6 months. They were asked to provide a pre- and post-FoCUS diagnosis, with the final diagnosis at discharge as reference. During a 7 month period 113 FoCUS examinations were reported; after 53 were excluded this left 60 for evaluation with a standard echocardiogram performed on average 11.5 h after FoCUS. Examinations were performed on the basis of chest pain and dyspnoea/edema. The best sensitivity was found in terms of the detection of reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (92%), LV dilatation (85%) and pericardial effusion (100%). High values were noted for negative predictive values, although false positives were seen. A kappa > 0.6 was observed for reduced LVEF, right ventricular area fraction and dilatation of LV and left atrium. In 48% of patients pre- and post-FoCUS diagnoses were identical and concordant with the final diagnosis. Importantly, in 30% examinations FoCUS correctly changed the pre-FoCUS diagnosis. A FoCUS protocol with a 4-h training program gained clinical usefulness in one third of examinations. False positive findings represented the major challenge.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of three-dimensional (3D) speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) to detect acute coronary occlusions in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and its potential diagnostic advantage over two-dimensional (2D) STE. Methods: Fifty-six patients with NSTE-ACS (mean age 64 ± 11 years; 80% male) underwent 2D and 3D transthoracic echocardiography prior to coronary angiography. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and 3D ejection fraction (EF) were analyzed. Acute coronary occlusion was defined as TIMI flow 0–1 in the presumed culprit artery. Results: Acute coronary occlusion was present in 16 patients (29%). Patients with occlusion had significantly more impaired strain compared to those without: 3D GLS (−12.5 ± 2.7% vs. −15.5 ± 2.1%, p < 0.001), 2D GLS (−12.6 ± 2.8% vs. −15.6 ± 2.0%, p < 0.001), 3D GCS (−24.8 ± 4.4% vs. −27.8 ± 4.3%, p = 0.02), and 2D GCS (−18.1 ± 5.5% vs. −22.9 ± 4.7%, p = 0.002). In contrast, 3D EF did not differ significantly between groups (52.5 ± 4.7% vs. 54.7 ± 5.7%, p = 0.16). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that 3D and 2D GLS had the highest diagnostic performance (AUCs 0.81 and 0.78), while 3D EF had the lowest (AUC 0.61). Feasibility was lower for 3D STE (86%) than for 2D longitudinal strain (95%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Both 3D and 2D GLS showed higher diagnostic accuracy than 3D EF in identifying acute coronary occlusion in NSTE-ACS patients. While 3D STE enables simultaneous assessment of multiple parameters, it did not offer incremental diagnostic value over 2D STE and had lower feasibility.