"Introduction: Postoperative complications are an integral aspect of the surgical audit, being a surrogate marker of surgical quality. Despite demonstrated efficacy in most specialties, there is scarce validation of current systems in plastic and reconstructive surgery, let alone a system unique to the specialty. This review aims to establish the efficacy of current systems in plastic and reconstructive surgery and formulate a classification unique to our specialty. Methods: A PUBMED literature search was performed in January 2023 encompassing all available literature. Search terms included ‘classification’, ‘grading’, ‘postoperative complications’ and ‘adverse events’. Further additions through bibliographic linkage generated a total of 363 articles. Results: Twenty-four papers were related to PRS. Sixteen used current systems to describe postoperative complications, whereas eight papers used a system designed uniquely for PRS. The downfall of conventional systems is the simplicity of return to the operating theatre, constituting a single grade in the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Return to theatre has a broad scope for heterogeneity in plastic and reconstructive surgery, particularly in reconstructive patients. A modification of the Clavien-Dindo Classification is proposed. Conclusion: There is limited efficacy of current classification systems for postoperative complications in plastic and reconstructive surgery nor a well-validated system unique to the specialty. A modified system with a detailed emphasis on return to the theatre will be of value to plastic and reconstructive surgery and ideally correlate with important outcomes. This will be validated in a retrospective review of the complication audit from the developing institution."

A 68 year old male presented to our Emergency Department with a one-day history of right sided abdominal pain, distention and vomiting on a background of no previous abdominal surgery. Abdominal CT demonstrated a high grade, closed loop small bowel obstruction involving the terminal segment of the ileum. Also of significance was alow-density appendiceal nodule. A subsequent laparoscopy revealed the tip of the appendix adherent to the mesosigmoid colon, forming a tight band and consequent mechanical bowel obstruction. Furthermore, the meso-appendix was embedded with crystal deposits and extruding mucin. The decision was made to convert to laparotomy and perform a caecectomy. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated reactivity to synaptophysin, chromogranin A and CD56, confirming the diagnosis of Goblet Cell Carcinoid. A staging CT after this initial surgery revealed no metastasis. After discussion at our oncology MDT, the patient went on to receive a completion right hemicolectomy which revealed no further malignancy on histology. The patient otherwise progressed well, and made a good post-operative recovery.

Background: Learning curves can reflect a surgical trainee’s rate of progress and competence in acquiring new skills. The INSORB subdermal staple device has been well established to facilitate decreased closure time across various surgical procedures, with similar cosmesis, healing, and consistency as those of standard subdermal sutures. This study is unique, as it demonstrated an observable learning curve with this device when used by a junior surgeon. Methods: Sixty-six patients underwent a cosmetic procedure during the second half of 2019 under the care of a single plastic surgeon in Melbourne, Australia. This corresponded to 254 unique linear incisions. Subdermal closure was done either with interrupted 3-0 Monocryl sutures or with the INSORB device. The consultant closed the incisions on one side, with the contralateral incision closed by the assistant using the same closure method. Data were then compared retrospectively, and closure times were compared over the ensuing 6 months. Results: Overall, consultant closure speed is 25% faster than assistant speed. When using 3-0 Monocryl, the difference is 33%, whereas the difference is reduced to 21% when using the INSORB. Furthermore, a mild learning curve could be appreciated with the assistant’s use of the INSORB over the comparatively short 6-month study period. Conclusions: In addition to improved speed, cost, outcome, and ergonomics, subdermal absorbable staples may also garner a faster learning curve than standard closure with 3-0 Monocryl. This study supported the learning curve of a surgical device as another innovative benefit and an important aspect of developing surgical technology.