Background: In Poland, the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain unknown. This study aimed to answer these unknowns by analyzing data collected from high-volume ECMO centers willing to participate in this project. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study was completed between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021 (15 months). Data from all patients treated with ECMO for COVID-19 were analyzed. Pre-ECMO laboratory and treatment data were compared between non-survivors and survivors. Independent predictors for death in the intensive care unit (ICU) were identified. Results: There were 171 patients admitted to participating centers requiring ECMO for refractory hypoxemia due to COVID-19 during the defined time period. A total of 158 patients (mean age: 46.3 ± 9.8 years) were analyzed, and 13 patients were still requiring ECMO at the end of the observation period. Most patients (88%) were treated after October 1, 2020, 77.8% were transferred to ECMO centers from another facility, and 31% were transferred on extracorporeal life support. The mean duration of ECMO therapy was 18.0 ± 13.5 days. The crude ICU mortality rate was 74.1%. In the group of 41 survivors, 37 patients were successfully weaned from ECMO support and four patients underwent a successful lung transplant. In-hospital death was independently associated with pre-ECMO lactate level (OR 2.10 per 1 mmol/L, p = 0.017) and BMI (OR 1.47 per 5 kg/m², p = 0.050). Conclusions: The ICU mortality rate among patients requiring ECMO for COVID-19 in Poland was high. In-hospital death was independently associated with increased pre-ECMO lactate levels and BMI.

The cold ischemia time (CIT) is a period of time between harvesting an organ for transplant and its reperfusion just after implantation. CIT may have an impact on frequency of complications after lung transplant that can be treated by means of bronchoscopic intervention. The aim of the study was to investigate the correlation between CIT and frequency of bronchoscopic intervention. The retrospective study consists of 91 patients: 22 single lung recipients (24%) and 69 double lung recipients (76%) who underwent lung transplant from March 2012 to June 2019. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 25.0 and R 3.5.3. The P levels less than .05 were deemed statistically significant. The average CIT in single lung transplant was 5.91 hours, and in double lung transplant it was 8.61 hours. For the 4- to 8-hour CIT the percentages were 80.95% for single lung recipients and 46.38% for double lung recipients. For CIT longer than 8 hours, the following percentages were observed: 9.53% in single lung transplant and 53.62% in double lung transplant. Each subsequent hour of CIT exponentially increases the risk of intervention 1505 times (50.05%). Prolonged CIT seems to be a risk factor for airway complication, especially in the double lung recipient group.

Introduction: Lung transplantation (LTx) is the only effective method of treatment to improve the health and quality of life (QoL) of patients with end-stage lung diseases. After LTx, medical examination accompanied by quality of life assessment should be performed on routine follow-up visits. The aim of the study was to assess the QoL of patients after LTx. Material and methods The study group consisted of 60 patients (29 women and 31 men); 20 patients received single lung transplantation (SLT), and 40 received double lung transplantation (DLT). To determine the patient’s QoL, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Test–BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were used. Spirometry and the 6-minute walk test were analyzed to examine efficiency of transplanted organs. Results: In SGRQ there are differences between patients with cystic fibrosis and interstitial lung disease in symptom domain (20.28% vs 39.26%, P = .025) and total score (19.38% vs 32.47%, P = .028). As reported in the GHQ, men had worse overall results than women in sten scale (5.22 points vs 4.69 points). Patients after SLT achieved similar scores in every questionnaire. Conclusion: Studies assessing QoL should be an important addition to lung function tests and an integral part of control during postoperative follow-up visits. This study is one of the important contributions to understanding of how essential QoL is after LTx. The authors of this study realize that their work does not cover the whole issue, and further studies in this area are warranted.

Lung transplant remains the only viable treatment for certain patients with end-stage lung diseases. Such patients can become either single or double lung recipients. The 2 procedures are associated with specific risks and benefits. The aim of the study was to assess the survival of patients after lung transplant in a single center. The retrospective study consists of 128 lung transplant recipients. Patients underwent transplant between 2004 and 2017 because of following diseases: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.2%), cystic fibrosis (26.5%), and primary pulmonary hypertension (12.3%), including idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and interstitial lung diseases (33%). Patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension were not treated with postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as left heart conditioning. Regardless of underlying disease, 75% of DLT recipients and 51% of SLT recipients reached 5-year survival (P = .0066). A total of 87% of lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis reached 1-year survival. Among lung recipients with primary pulmonary hypertension who underwent DLT and SLT, 5-year survival was reached by 84% and 51%, respectively (P = .025). Among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 82% of DLT recipients and 62% of SLT recipients reached 1-year survival (P = .22). Patients who received transplants because of primary pulmonary hypertension presented the worst short-term survival among all SLT recipients. Patients with CF have the best overall survival among all lung transplant recipients. Double lung transplant provides statistically significantly better outcomes than single lung transplant. This observation is also present among recipients who underwent transplant because of primary pulmonary hypertension, as single lung transplant is not recommended among such patients in particular.

Long-term outcomes of airway complications (AC) after lung transplantation are unknown. The incidence of AC varies from 1.6% to 32% with the related mortality rate of 2% to 4%. The management of most AC is based on endobronchial methods, including balloon bronchoplasty, endobronchial stent placement, and ablative techniques. The aim of the study was to assess the connection between airway complications treated by bronchial intervention (BI) and the survival of lung transplant recipients. The single-center retrospective study reviewed the cases of 165 patients (63 women [38.18%], 103 men [61, 82%]; median age at referral for lung transplantations (LTx), 41 years [range, 15-68 years]). The cohort was stratified into 2 groups comprising those whose procedures were complicated by ACs and those without. The primary outcome measured was mortality, with survival endpoints calculated at 6 months. The comparison of the survival of recipients regarding underlying disease (cystic fibrosis [CF], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], idiopathic pulmonary artery hypertension [IPAH], and others) with the use of the Kaplan-Meier estimator indicated that the only statistically significant (P = .0194) differences between patients who underwent BI and patients without BI performed were observed in CF patients (Fig 1). In any other diagnosis, the results were not statistically significant (P > .05). Bronchoscopic intervention because of airway complications after lung transplantation are often-used procedures, but they have no impact on the survival of patients with cystic fibrosis.