Objective: While sex differences in the treatment and outcomes of subjects with acute coronary syndromes are well documented, little is known about the impact of cardiac troponin (cTn) levels obtained in the emergency department (ED) on the observed sex differences. We sought to determine whether cTn levels by chest pain features modify sex differences in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in patients presenting with chest pain suggestive of ischemia.Methods: All adults presenting to two hospitals in Vancouver, Canada, between May 2008 and March 2013 with ischemic chest pain and with cTn testing were included in the study. Outcomes were obtained through data linkage with population‐based administrative data sets, including Vital Statistics (death), Discharge Abstract Database (hospitalizations), and PharmaNet (medications). Cumulative event rates for the composite major adverse cardiac event (MACE) endpoint (death, myocardial infarction [MI], incident admission for heart failure or for angina requiring diagnostic catheterization or revascularization) were estimated for each sex and cTn level using the Kaplan‐Meier method; Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval (CIs) for 1‐year MACE and 7‐day catheterization. Logistic models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI for 90‐day medication use.Results: Over the 5‐year study period, 25,539 patients presented to the ED with chest pain of which 7,272 (2,933 females and 4,339 males) met the inclusion criteria. Among patients with chest pain with cardiac features/history and cTn > 99th percentile, females were less likely to be diagnosed with MI (46.4% vs. 57.5%). Females in the cTnI > 99th percentile group had the worst outcomes with a 1‐year MACE rate of 22.7% (95% CI = 18.5–27.7) versus 18.8% (95% CI = 16.2–21.6), although this difference was attenuated and not statistically significant after adjustment for baseline differences. Overall, females underwent fewer diagnostic catheterizations than males within 7 days of admission to the ED. Even when cTn was above the 99th percentile and the chest pain was cardiac in nature, 48.4% of females underwent a diagnostic catheterization compared to 64.3% of males (p < 0.001). Within 90 days of discharge, females were less likely to use the evidence‐based cardiac medications. The most striking sex differences were noted when cTnI levels were > 99th percentile and when the chest pain was cardiac in nature; males filled 25% more prescriptions for statins than their female counterparts. Adjustment for baseline differences did not attenuate this difference.Conclusions: Sex differences in diagnosis and treatment after presentation to the ED with chest pain are not explained by differences in chest pain features or levels of cTn. Even when females have cardiac chest pain and cTn levels > 99th percentile, they are less likely to be diagnosed with MI, less likely to undergo diagnostic cardiac catheterization within 7 days, and less likely to use evidence‐based cardiac medications, but they have the highest 1‐year MACE rate. The higher MACE rate appears to be driven by the higher burden of comorbid conditions.

Previous data suggest significant ethnic differences in outcomes following percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI), though previous studies have focused on subgroups of PCI patients or used administrative data only. We sought to compare outcomes in a population-based cohort of men and women of South Asian (SA), Chinese and “Other” ethnicity. Using a population-based registry, we identified 41,792 patients who underwent first revascularization via PCI in British Columbia, Canada, between 2001 and 2010. We defined three ethnic groups (SA, 3904 [9.3%]; Chinese, 1345 [3.2%]; and all “Others” 36,543 [87.4%]). Differences in mortality, repeat revascularization (RRV) and target vessel revascularization (TVR), at 30 days and from 31 days to 2 years were examined. Adjusted mortality from 31 days to 2 years was lower in Chinese patients than in “Others” (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.97), but not different between SAs and “Others”. SA patients had higher RRV at 30 days (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% CI: 1.12-1.51) and from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.17; 95% CI: 1.06-1.30) compared to “Others”. In contrast, Chinese patients had a lower rate of RRV from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.96) versus “Others”. SA patients also had higher rates of TVR at 30 days (adjusted OR 1.35; 95% CI: 1.10-1.66) and from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06-1.34) compared to “Others”. Chinese patients had a lower rate of TVR from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60-0.96). SA had higher RRV and TVR rates while Chinese Canadians had lower rates of long-term RRV, compared to those of “Other” ethnicity. Further research to elucidate the reasons for these differences could inform targeted strategies to improve outcomes.

Background: Despite its high prevalence, little is known about the effect of sex on the management and outcomes of aortic stenosis (AS). We sought to characterize the effect of sex on the clinical evaluation for and provision of aortic valve replacement (AVR), including surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and the subsequent morbidity and mortality outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive chart review was conducted on all patients with a first diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis (AS) at Vancouver General and University of British Columbia hospitals from 2012 to 2022. Exact chi-square and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to evaluate the variables of interest. Results: A total of 1794 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 782 females (44%) and 1012 males (56%). Females were significantly older than males at the time of the first diagnosis (79 versus 75 years, p < 0.001). Females were significantly less likely to be evaluated by the TAVR clinic or cardiac surgeon or to receive aortic valve intervention (p-value ≤ 0.001). Females were significantly more likely to be rejected for TAVR due to older age (OR 0.23 (0.07, 0.59)), comorbid conditions (OR 0.68 (0.47, 0.97)), and frailty (OR 0.23 (0.07, 0.59)). Females were significantly more likely to be rejected for SAVR on the basis of frailty (OR 0.66 (0.46, 0.94)). Females also had significantly higher rates of 1-year mortality, hospitalization, and heart failure hospitalization compared to males (p-values < 0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest significant sex-based discrepancies in the management of AS. Females with severe AS are diagnosed later in life and are less likely to be evaluated for valve intervention. They are less likely to receive intervention due to older age, frailty, and multimorbid conditions. Further research is warranted for a more effective identification and follow up of aortic stenosis, as well as timely referral for AVR, where appropriate, especially for females.