Background: Bimekizumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab are IL-17-targeting biologics approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. While secukinumab and ixekizumab selectively inhibit IL-17A, bimekizumab targets both IL-17A and IL-17F, potentially providing greater anti-inflammatory efficacy. This study aimed to compare the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of these agents in a Polish dermatology center between 2019 and 2024. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 98 patients meeting at least one of the following criteria: PASI ≥ 10, BSA ≥ 10, DLQI ≥ 10, or involvement of special areas with inadequate response or contraindications to ≥2 systemic therapies. Patients with prior exposure only to IL-17 inhibitors were excluded. PASI, BSA, and DLQI scores were recorded at baseline, week 4, and week 12. Due to differences in dosing schedules, outcomes were aligned using standardized timepoints and exponential modeling of continuous response trajectories. Mixed-effects ANOVA was used to assess the influence of baseline factors (age, BMI, PsA status) on treatment outcomes. Adverse events were documented at each monthly follow-up visit. Results: Bimekizumab showed the greatest effect size for PASI reduction (Hedges’ g = 3.662), followed by secukinumab (2.813) and ixekizumab (1.986). Exponential modeling revealed a steeper response trajectory with bimekizumab (intercept = 0.289), suggesting a more rapid PASI improvement. The efficacy of bimekizumab was particularly notable in patients who were previously treated with IL-23 inhibitors. All three agents demonstrated favorable safety profiles, with no serious adverse events or discontinuations. The most frequent adverse events were mild and included upper respiratory tract infections and oral candidiasis. Conclusions: This real-world analysis confirmed that IL-17 inhibitors effectively improved PASI, BSA, and DLQI scores in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Bimekizumab demonstrated the most rapid early improvements and a higher modeled likelihood of complete clearance, without significant differences at week 12. All agents were well tolerated, underscoring the need for further individualized, large-scale studies.

Background: Rosacea is a chronic facial skin disease in which persistent erythema is a significant clinical problem, often resistant to standard therapies. Intensive pulsating light (IPL) has become a recognised and effective method of treating erythema and telangiectasia. The latest recommendations emphasise the advantage of combining subjective clinical assessments with objective imaging analyses in monitoring therapy effects. Methods: A total of 20 patients with rosacea qualified for this study. They were subjected to three polychromatic light procedures (Lumecca, Inmode; wavelength of 515–1200 nm) at 21-day intervals. The skin condition was documented photographically, and the degree of erythema was assessed on the basis of the Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) scale and objective analysis of the skin texture, using the parameters of contrast and homogeneity of the grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Results: A series of three polychromatic light treatments yielded a significant clinical improvement in all patients. The mean CEA value decreased by 61.11%, whereas the GLCM contrast in all the analysed facial areas dropped by about 17%, and homogeneity increased by 4–5%. The effects persisted for at least three months after the treatments. A high correlation of CEA scale results with GLCM parameters (R = 0.81–0.94 for contrast; R = −0.77 to −0.83 for homogeneity) was observed. Conclusions: Three polychromatic light treatments proved to be a very effective method of reducing erythema in rosacea, confirmed by both clinical evaluation and objective imaging analysis. The effects of therapy were durable and clear. Integration of the subjective method (CEA) with GLCM analysis can be a path for future research and clinical practice in the assessment of erythematous skin lesions.

Review; Authors: W. Kruczek, A. Mandecka, M. Kalicka, B. Jelonek, A. Frątczak, B. Berler-Czop, B. Miziołek