Rasim Meral

Prof. Dr. Rasim Meral

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 July 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UGUgur Gezer
Ugur Gezer
RMRasim Meral
Rasim Meral
EOEmre Ozgur
Emre Ozgur
EYEbru Esin Yoruker
Ebru Esin Yoruker
Abel BronkhorstAbel Bronkhorst
Abel Bronkhorst
Stefan HoldenriederStefan Holdenrieder
Stefan Holdenrieder
Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) that develop from the mucosal epithelium in the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx are a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors. A lack of appropriate screening and diagnostic methods leads to late diagnoses, with the majority of patients having locally advanced disease, which is associated with a high risk of local recurrence and a poor prognosis and is usually treated with combination therapies. Biomarkers for predicting the therapy response and risk of recurrence in HNSCC patients are urgently needed. Liquid biopsy, e.g., the profiling of circulating biomarkers in bodily fluids, is a promising approach with increasing utility in the early detection and diagnosis of cancer, monitoring cancer progression, patient stratification and treatment selection, detecting minimal residual disease (MRD), and predicting recurrence across different cancer types, including HNSCC. Among liquid biomarkers, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), which is based on detecting tumor-specific mutations, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations, and methylation, is the most promising transformative tool in cancer management and personalized cancer treatment. In this review, we provide an update of recent data on the role of non-viral ctDNA in the management of HNSCC patients. Accumulating data suggests the enormous potential of ctDNA profiling by serial sampling during and after definitive therapy in detecting MRD and predicting recurrence in HNSSC patients treated with a single treatment modality (surgery or radiotherapy) or with combination therapies, including immune-checkpoint-inhibitor-based immunotherapy. By incorporating the latest immunotherapy trials and organizing the data by the treatment modality, this review offers a novel perspective not found in previous surveys.

16 October 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KIKamuran Ibis
Kamuran Ibis
KTKubra Ozkaya Toraman
Kubra Ozkaya Toraman
CACanan Koksal Akbas
Canan Koksal Akbas
ÖGÖZLEM GÜLER GÜNİKEN
ÖZLEM GÜLER GÜNİKEN
KKKorhan Kokce
Korhan Kokce
MAMusa Altun
Musa Altun
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare target volumes and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses using five different volume definitions in radiotherapy (RT) planning of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Materials and Methods: Rigid image fusion was performed using simulation computed tomography and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans of 20 patients with GBM. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated according to three two-phase protocols—American Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC), North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Alliance (NCCTG/Alliance), and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/NRG (RTOG/NRG)—and two single-phase protocols—European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology–European Association of Neuro-Oncology (ESTRO/EANO)—each delivering a total dose of 60 Gy. OARs and dose constraints were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired sample t-test. Results: The ESTRO/EANO volume had the smallest median PTV overall (p < 0.001). The lowest brain-PTV Dmean in the initial phase was observed in the ABTC group, followed closely by ESTRO/EANO (p < 0.001). Among boost volumes, the ABTC volume was the smallest, and the median brain-PTV Dmean was lowest in the ESTRO/EANO volume. ESTRO/EANO provided the lowest doses for contralateral and ipsilateral cochlea Dmean, brainstem D1cc, and contralateral lens Dmax. Notably, both EORTC and ESTRO/EANO plans maintained OAR doses within acceptable constraints, with ESTRO/EANO achieving the most consistently minimised exposure. Conclusions: Reduced irradiated brain volume, acceptable OAR preservation and practical applicability, the use of ESTRO-EANO and EORTC target volumes in radiotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme may provide dosimetric advantages that require further validation in clinical outcome studies.

21 May 2023 in Journal of Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KTKübra Özkaya Toraman
Kübra Özkaya Toraman
RMRasim Meral
Rasim Meral
AKAhmet Nafiz Karadeniz
Ahmet Nafiz Karadeniz
GKGizem Kaval
Gizem Kaval
MBMert Başaran
Mert Başaran
MAMusa Altun
Musa Altun
This is the report on our clinic's 15 years of experience (2004-2018) on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), treated with induction chemotherapy (IC) and subsequent concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), comprising population characteristics and treatment outcomes of 203 patients with non-metastatic NPC. IC comprised docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) combination (TP). Concurrent cisplatin (P) was applied either weekly (40 mg/m2, 32 cases) or every-3-week (100 mg/m2, 171 cases). The median follow-up duration was 85 months (range, 5-204 months). Overall and distant failure rates were observed in 27.1% (n = 55) and 13.8% (n = 28) patients, respectively. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 84.1%, 86.4%, 75%, and 78.7% respectively. The overall stage was an independent prognostic factor for the LRRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS. The WHO histological type was a prognostic factor for the LRRFS, DFS, and OS. Age was a prognostic factor for the DMFS, DFS, and OS. Concurrent P schedule was independent prognostic only the LRRFS.