Clinically relevant bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for prostate cancer patients. Distinct phenotypes are described: osteoblastic, the more common osteolytic and mixed. A molecular classification has been also proposed. Bone metastases start with the tropism of cancer cells to the bone through different multi-step tumor–host interactions, as described by the “metastatic cascade” model. Understanding these mechanisms, although far from being fully elucidated, could offer several potential targets for prevention and therapy. Moreover, the prognosis of patients is markedly influenced by skeletal-related events. They can be correlated not only with bone metastases, but also with “bad” bone health. There is a close correlation between osteoporosis—a skeletal disorder with decreased bone mass and qualitative alterations—and prostate cancer, in particular when treated with androgen deprivation therapy, a milestone in its treatment. Systemic treatments for prostate cancer, especially with the newest options, have improved the survival and quality of life of patients with respect to skeletal-related events; however, all patients should be evaluated for “bone health” and osteoporotic risk, both in the presence and in the absence of bone metastases. Treatment with bone-targeted therapies should be evaluated even in the absence of bone metastases, as described in special guidelines and according to a multidisciplinary evaluation.

Biliary tract cancers are anatomically distinct and genetically diverse tumors, evenly characterized by poor response to standard treatments and a bleak outlook. The advent of comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing has unveiled a plethora of potentially actionable aberrations, changing the view of biliary tract cancers from an “orphan” to a “target-rich” disease. Recently, mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase genes (IDH1/2) and fusions of the fibroblast growth factor receptor have emerged as the most amenable to molecularly targeted inhibition, with several compounds actively investigated in advanced-phase clinical trials. Specifically, the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib has been the first targeted agent to show a survival benefit in a randomized phase III trial of cholangiocarcinoma patients harboring IDH1 mutations. In this review article, we will focus on the IDH1/IDH2 pathway, discussing the preclinical rationale of its targeting as well as the promises and challenges of the clinical development of IDH inhibitors in biliary tract cancers.

Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma is a rare, poorly differentiated, and highly aggressive type of non-small cell lung cancer. High tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 overexpression make it an excellent candidate for immunotherapy. Objectives and Method: We presented the case of a patient who underwent left inferior lobectomy with concurrent right paravertebral muscular metastasectomy for an infiltrative neoplastic mass, whose final diagnosis was consistent with stage IV pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. He received first- and second-line chemotherapy without any benefit. Since March 2016, he has been treated with the anti-PD1 agent nivolumab with a dramatic improvement of symptoms, disappearance of a brain lesion, and partial response on other metastatic sites. He tolerated the treatment well and is still responding after 22 months from the beginning. Results and Conclusions: In very lethal non-small cell lung cancer subtypes such as the sarcomatoid variants, high tumor burden and deteriorated general conditions should not preclude, at least in some cases, the use of immunotherapy. Anti-PD1 may also have a reliable role in disease control in the brain. Lastly, the strong rationale behind sarcomatoid histology should further prompt trials exploring immunotherapeutic approaches in this subset of non-small cell lung cancer.