Anticancer treatment efficacy is limited by the development of refractory tumor cells characterized by increased expression and activity of mechanisms promoting survival, proliferation, and metastatic spread. The present review summarizes the current literature regarding the use of the anthelmintic mebendazole (MBZ) as a repurposed drug in oncology with a focus on cells resistant to approved therapies, including so called “cancer stem cells”. Mebendazole meets many of the characteristics desirable for a repurposed drug: good and proven toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics allowing to reach therapeutic concentrations at disease site, ease of administration and low price. Several in vitro studies suggest that MBZ inhibits a wide range of factors involved in tumor progression such as tubulin polymerization, angiogenesis, pro-survival pathways, matrix metalloproteinases, and multi-drug resistance protein transporters. Mebendazole not only exhibits direct cytotoxic activity, but also synergizes with ionizing radiations and different chemotherapeutic agents and stimulates antitumoral immune response. In vivo, MBZ treatment as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy led to the reduction or complete arrest of tumor growth, marked decrease of metastatic spread, and improvement of survival. Further investigations are warranted to confirm the clinical anti-neoplastic activity of MBZ and its safety in combination with other drugs in a clinical setting.

Background: Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) in pancreatic and biliary tract cancer (PBC) suffers from proximity to any organ(s) at risk (OARs). Some strategies to manage this issue have previously been proposed, such as Simultaneous Integrated Protection (SIP), with the aim of maintaining a biological effective dose prescription while reducing toxicities. We performed a systematic review of the literature about SRT techniques applied in patients with tumor in proximity to OARs, with the aim of testing safety and efficacy. Methods: using PRISMA guidelines, we selected studies from a pool of more than 25,000 articles published from 2010 to 30 January 2023 that explored the use of SRT to deliver targeted treatment for PBC. We then selected the ones referring to decreases in prescription doses (for SRT only) in the area of overlap between planning target volume (PTV) and OARs. Local control (LC) and toxicities being detailed were exclusion criteria for articles. Results: 9 studies were included in our review, considering 368 patients. One-year LC probability ranges between 67% and 98.3% were reported. Late G3 toxicities ranged between 0% and 5.3%, while G4-G5 late toxicities were both reported as 0.3%. Conclusion: prioritizing critical OAR constraints limits severe toxicities while preserving LC in PBC SRT. Improving in-study reporting is essential to confirm these promising results.

Objective: The therapeutic landscape for localized prostate cancer (PC) is evolving. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has been reported to be at least not inferior to standard radiotherapy, but the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in this setting is still unknown and its use is left to clinical judgment. There is therefore the need to clarify the role of ADT in association with SRT, which is the aim of the present study. Methods: We present a study protocol for a randomized, multi-institutional, Phase III clinical trial, designed to study SRT in unfavorable intermediate and a subclass of high-risk localized PC. Patients (pts) will be randomized 1:1 to SRT + ADT or SRT alone. SRT will consists in 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions, ADT will be a single administration of Triptorelin 22.5 mg concurrent to SRT. Primary end point will be biochemical disease-free survival. Secondary end points will be disease-free survival, freedom from local recurrence, freedom from regional recurrence, freedom from distant metastasis and overall survival (OS); quality of life QoL and patient reported outcomes will be an exploratory end point and will be scored with EPIC-26, EORTC PR 25, IPSS, IIEF questionnaires in SRT + ADT and SRT alone arms. Moreover, clinician reported acute and late toxicity, assessed with CTCAE v. 5.0 scales will be safety end points. Results: Sample size is estimated of 310 pts. For acute toxicity and quality of life results are awaited after 6 months since last patient in, whereas, for efficacy end points and late toxicity mature results will be available 3–5 years after last patient in. Conclusion: Evidence is insufficient to guide decision making concerning ADT administration in the new scenario of prostate ultra-hypofractionation. Hence, the need to investigate the ADT role in SRT specific setting. Advances in knowledge: The stereotactic prostate radiotherapy with or without ADT trial (SPA Trial) has been designed to establish a new standard of care for SRT in localized unfavorable intermediate and a subclass of localized high risk PC.