Alessia Nottegar

Alessia Nottegar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2016 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ANAlessia Nottegar
Alessia Nottegar
Nicola VeroneseNicola Veronese
Nicola Veronese
MSMaheswari Senthil
Maheswari Senthil
RRR.M. Roumen
R.M. Roumen
BSB. Stubbs
B. Stubbs
Claudio LuchiniClaudio Luchini
Claudio Luchini
Invasive breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Its most common site of metastasis is represented by the lymph nodes of axilla, and the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is the first station of nodal metastasis. Axillary SLN biopsy accurately predicts axillary lymph node status and has been accepted as standard of care for nodal staging in breast cancer. To date, the morphologic aspects of SLN metastasis have not been considered by the oncologic staging system. Extranodal extension (ENE) of nodal metastasis, defined as extension of neoplastic cells through the nodal capsule into the peri-nodal adipose tissue, has recently emerged as an important prognostic factor in several types of malignancies. It has also been considered as a possible predictor of non-sentinel node tumor burden in SLN-positive breast cancer patients. We sought out to clarify the prognostic role of ENE in SLN-positive breast cancer patients in terms of overall and disease-free survival by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Among 172 screened articles, 5 were eligible for the meta-analysis; they globally include 624 patients (163 ENE+ and 461 ENE-) with a median follow-up of 58 months. ENE was associated with a higher risk of both mortality (RR = 2.51; 95% CI: 1.66-3.79, p < 0.0001, I(2) = 0%) and recurrence of disease (RR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.38-3.10, p < 0.0001, I(2) = 0%). These findings recommend the consideration of ENE from the gross sampling to the histopathological evaluation, in perspectives to be validated and included in the oncologic staging.

19 October 2015 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nicola VeroneseNicola Veronese
Nicola Veronese
ANAlessia Nottegar
Alessia Nottegar
APA. Pea
A. Pea
MSMarco Solm
Marco Solm
BSB. Stubbs
B. Stubbs
Claudio LuchiniClaudio Luchini
Claudio Luchini
The extranodal extension (ENE) of nodal metastasis (i.e. the extension of tumor cells through the nodal capsule into the perinodal adipose tissue) has recently emerged as an important prognostic factor in different types of malignancies. However, the tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system for colorectal cancer does not consider it as a prognostic parameter. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prognostic role of ENE in patients with lymph node-positive colorectal cancer. Two independent authors searched PubMed and SCOPUS until 7 January 2015 without language restrictions. Prospective studies reporting data on prognostic parameters in subjects with colorectal cancer, comparing participants with the presence of ENE (ENE+) versus only intranodal extension (ENE−) were eligible. Data were summarized using risk ratios (RRs) for the number of deaths/recurrences and hazard ratios (HRs) together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for time-dependent risk related to ENE+, adjusted for potential confounders. Thirteen studies including 1336 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 4.7 years. ENE was associated with a higher T stage and tumor grading. In addition, ENE was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 1.75; 95% CI 1.42–2.16, P < 0.0001, I2 = 60%; HR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.32–2.17, P < 0.0001, I2 = 46%) and of recurrence of disease (RR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.65–2.61, P < 0.0001, I2 = 47%; HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.54–3.44, P < 0.0001, I2 = 48%). Based of these results, in colorectal cancer, ENE should be considered from the gross sampling to the pathology report, as well as in future oncologic staging systems.

25 May 2016 in Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Claudio LuchiniClaudio Luchini
Claudio Luchini
NVNicola Veronese
Nicola Veronese
SYShinichi Yachida
Shinichi Yachida
LCLiang Cheng
Liang Cheng
ANAlessia Nottegar
Alessia Nottegar
ASAldo Scarpa
Aldo Scarpa

1 March 2016 in Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Claudio LuchiniClaudio Luchini
Claudio Luchini
ANAlessia Nottegar
Alessia Nottegar
MSMarco Solm
Marco Solm
Giuseppe SergiGiuseppe Sergi
Giuseppe Sergi
EMEnzo Manzato
Enzo Manzato
Nicola VeroneseNicola Veronese
Nicola Veronese

23 October 2015 in Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nicola VeroneseNicola Veronese
Nicola Veronese
Claudio LuchiniClaudio Luchini
Claudio Luchini
ANAlessia Nottegar
Alessia Nottegar
TKTakuma Kaneko
Takuma Kaneko
Giuseppe SergiGiuseppe Sergi
Giuseppe Sergi
ASAldo Scarpa
Aldo Scarpa

1 May 2014 in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAnna Caliò
Anna Caliò
ANAlessia Nottegar
Alessia Nottegar
EGEliana Gilioli
Eliana Gilioli
EBEmilio Bria
Emilio Bria
SPSara Pilotto
Sara Pilotto
Matteo BrunelliMatteo Brunelli
Matteo Brunelli