Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the deposited structure and mechanical performance of printed materials obtained during initial development of the Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) system at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Issues unique to large-scale polymer deposition are identified and presented to reduce the learning curve for the development of similar systems. Design/methodology/approach: Although the BAAM’s individual extruded bead is 10-20× larger (∼9 mm) than the typical small-scale systems, the overall characteristics of the deposited material are very similar. This study relates the structure of BAAM materials to the material composition, deposition parameters and resulting mechanical performance. Findings: Materials investigated during initial trials are suitable for stiffness-limited applications. The strength of printed materials can be significantly reduced by voids and imperfect fusion between layers. Deposited material was found to have voids between adjacent beads and micro-porosity within a given bead. Failure generally occurs at interfaces between adjacent beads and successive layers, indicating imperfect contact area and polymer fusion. Practical implications: The incorporation of second-phase reinforcement in printed materials can significantly improve stiffness but can result in notable anisotropy that needs to be accounted for in the design of BAAM-printed structures. Originality/value: This initial evaluation of BAAM-deposited structures and mechanical performance will guide the current research effort for improving interlaminar strength and process control.

Over 15 million epilepsy patients worldwide have drug-resistant epilepsy. Successful surgery is a standard of care treatment but can only be achieved through complete resection or disconnection of the epileptogenic zone, the brain region(s) where seizures originate. Surgical success rates vary between 20% and 80%, because no clinically validated biological markers of the epileptogenic zone exist. Localizing the epileptogenic zone is a costly and time-consuming process, which often requires days to weeks of intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring. Clinicians visually inspect iEEG data to identify abnormal activity on individual channels occurring immediately before seizures or spikes that occur interictally (i.e. between seizures). In the end, the clinical standard mainly relies on a small proportion of the iEEG data captured to assist in epileptogenic zone localization (minutes of seizure data versus days of recordings), missing opportunities to leverage these largely ignored interictal data to better diagnose and treat patients. IEEG offers a unique opportunity to observe epileptic cortical network dynamics but waiting for seizures increases patient risks associated with invasive monitoring. In this study, we aimed to leverage interictal iEEG data by developing a new network-based interictal iEEG marker of the epileptogenic zone. We hypothesized that when a patient is not clinically seizing, it is because the epileptogenic zone is inhibited by other regions. We developed an algorithm that identifies two groups of nodes from the interictal iEEG network: those that are continuously inhibiting a set of neighbouring nodes (‘sources’) and the inhibited nodes themselves (‘sinks’). Specifically, patient-specific dynamical network models were estimated from minutes of iEEG and their connectivity properties revealed top sources and sinks in the network, with each node being quantified by source-sink metrics. We validated the algorithm in a retrospective analysis of 65 patients. The source-sink metrics identified epileptogenic regions with 73% accuracy and clinicians agreed with the algorithm in 93% of seizure-free patients. The algorithm was further validated by using the metrics of the annotated epileptogenic zone to predict surgical outcomes. The source-sink metrics predicted outcomes with an accuracy of 79% compared to an accuracy of 43% for clinicians’ predictions (surgical success rate of this dataset). In failed outcomes, we identified brain regions with high metrics that were untreated. When compared with high frequency oscillations, the most commonly proposed interictal iEEG feature for epileptogenic zone localization, source-sink metrics outperformed in predictive power (by a factor of 1.2), suggesting they may be an interictal iEEG fingerprint of the epileptogenic zone.

Over the past 10 years, the drive to improve outcomes from epilepsy surgery has stimulated widespread interest in methods to quantitatively guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG (iEEG). Many patients fail to achieve seizure freedom, in part due to the challenges in subjective iEEG interpretation. To address this clinical need, quantitative iEEG analytics have been developed using a variety of approaches, spanning studies of seizures, interictal periods, and their transitions, and encompass a range of techniques including electrographic signal analysis, dynamical systems modeling, machine learning and graph theory. Unfortunately, many methods fail to generalize to new data and are sensitive to differences in pathology and electrode placement.Here, we critically review selected literature on computational methods of identifying the epileptogenic zone from iEEG. We highlight shared methodological challenges common to many studies in this field and propose ways that they can be addressed. One fundamental common pitfall is a lack of open-source, high-quality data, which we specifically address by sharing a centralized high-quality, well-annotated, multicentre dataset consisting of >100 patients to support larger and more rigorous studies. Ultimately, we provide a road map to help these tools reach clinical trials and hope to improve the lives of future patients.

Favorable neurodevelopmental outcomes in epileptic spasms (ES) are tied to early diagnosis and prompt treatment, but uncertainty in the identification of the disease can delay this process. Therefore, we investigated five categories of computational electroencephalographic (EEG) measures as markers of ES. We measured 1) amplitude, 2) power spectra, 3) Shannon entropy and permutation entropy, 4) long-range temporal correlations, via detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) and 5) functional connectivity using cross-correlation and phase lag index (PLI). EEG data were analyzed from ES patients (n = 40 patients) and healthy controls (n = 20 subjects), with multiple blinded measurements during wakefulness and sleep for each patient. In ES patients, EEG amplitude was significantly higher in all electrodes when compared to controls. Shannon and permutation entropy were lower in ES patients than control subjects. The DFA intercept values in ES patients were significantly higher than control subjects, while DFA exponent values were not significantly different between the groups. EEG functional connectivity networks in ES patients were significantly stronger than controls when based on both cross-correlation and PLI. Significance for all statistical tests was p < 0.05, adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure as appropriate. Finally, using logistic regression, a multi-attribute classifier was derived that accurately distinguished cases from controls (area under curve of 0.96). Computational EEG features successfully distinguish ES patients from controls in a large, blinded study. These objective EEG markers, in combination with other clinical factors, may speed the diagnosis and treatment of the disease, thereby improving long-term outcomes.

Successful outcomes in epilepsy surgery rely on the accurate localization of the seizure onset zone. Localizing the seizure onset zone is often a costly and time-consuming process wherein a patient undergoes intracranial EEG monitoring, and a team of clinicians wait for seizures to occur. Clinicians then analyse the intracranial EEG before each seizure onset to identify the seizure onset zone and localization accuracy increases when more seizures are captured. In this study, we develop a new approach to guide clinicians to actively elicit seizures with electrical stimulation. We propose that a brain region belongs to the seizure onset zone if a periodic stimulation at a particular frequency produces large amplitude oscillations in the intracranial EEG network that propagate seizure activity. Such responses occur when there is ‘resonance’ in the intracranial EEG network, and the resonant frequency can be detected by observing a sharp peak in the magnitude versus frequency response curve, called a Bode plot. To test our hypothesis, we analysed single-pulse electrical stimulation response data in 32 epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring. For each patient and each stimulated brain region, we constructed a Bode plot by estimating a transfer function model from the intracranial EEG ‘impulse’ or single-pulse electrical stimulation response. The Bode plots were then analysed for evidence of resonance. First, we showed that when Bode plot features were used as a marker of the seizure onset zone, it distinguished successful from failed surgical outcomes with an area under the curve of 0.83, an accuracy that surpassed current methods of analysis with cortico-cortical evoked potential amplitude and cortico-cortical spectral responses. Then, we retrospectively showed that three out of five native seizures accidentally triggered in four patients during routine periodic stimulation at a given frequency corresponded to a resonant peak in the Bode plot. Last, we prospectively stimulated peak resonant frequencies gleaned from the Bode plots to elicit seizures in six patients, and this resulted in an induction of three seizures and three auras in these patients. These findings suggest neural resonance as a new biomarker of the seizure onset zone that can guide clinicians in eliciting native seizures to more quickly and accurately localize the seizure onset zone.

Direct cortical stimulation has been applied in epilepsy for nearly a century and has experienced a renaissance, given unprecedented opportunities to probe, excite, and inhibit the human brain. Evidence suggests stimulation can increase diagnostic and therapeutic utility in patients with drug‐resistant epilepsies. However, choosing appropriate stimulation parameters is not a trivial issue, and is further complicated by epilepsy being characterized by complex brain state dynamics. In this article derived from discussions at the ICTALS 2022 Conference (International Conference on Technology and Analysis for Seizures), we succinctly review the literature on cortical stimulation applied acutely and chronically to the epileptic brain for localization, monitoring, and therapeutic purposes. In particular, we discuss how stimulation is used to probe brain excitability, discuss evidence on the usefulness of stimulation to trigger and stop seizures, review therapeutic applications of stimulation, and finally discuss how stimulation parameters are impacted by brain dynamics. Although research has advanced considerably over the past decade, there are still significant hurdles to optimizing use of this technique. For example, it remains unclear to what extent short timescale diagnostic biomarkers can predict long‐term outcomes and to what extent these biomarkers add information to already existing biomarkers from passive electroencephalographic recordings. Further questions include the extent to which closed loop stimulation offers advantages over open loop stimulation, what the optimal closed loop timescales may be, and whether biomarker‐informed stimulation can lead to seizure freedom. The ultimate goal of bioelectronic medicine remains not just to stop seizures but rather to cure epilepsy and its comorbidities.