Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a complex clinical syndrome, and patients often have high short-term mortality. It occurs with intense systemic inflammation, often accompanied by a proinflammatory event (such as infection or alcoholic hepatitis), and is closely related to single or multiple organ failure. Liver inflammation begins when innate immune cells (such as Kupffer cells (KCs)) are activated by binding of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) from pathogenic microorganisms or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) of host origin to their pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Activated KCs can secrete inflammatory factors as well as chemokines and recruit bone marrow-derived cells such as neutrophils and monocytes to the liver to enhance the inflammatory process. Bacterial translocation may contribute to ACLF when there are no obvious precipitating events. Immunometabolism plays an important role in the process (including mitochondrial dysfunction, amino acid metabolism, and lipid metabolism). The late stage of ACLF is mainly characterized by immunosuppression. In this process, the dysfunction of monocyte and macrophage is reflected in the downregulation of HLA-DR and upregulation of MER tyrosine kinase (MERTK), which weakens the antigen presentation function and reduces the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. We also describe the specific function of bacterial translocation and the gut–liver axis in the process of ACLF. Finally, we also describe the transcriptomics in HBV-ACLF and the recent progress of single-cell RNA sequencing as well as its potential application in the study of ACLF in the future, in order to gain a deeper understanding of ACLF in terms of single-cell gene expression.
Natural killer (NK) cells contribute to liver transplant (LTx) rejection. However, the blood-circulating NK-cell dynamics of patients who experience acute rejection (AR) are unclear. Herein, we longitudinally profiled the total NK cells and their subsets, along with the expression of activating and inhibitory receptors in sequential peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples, spanning from before LTx to the first year after LTx of 32 patients with AR and 30 patients under a steady immune status. Before transplantation, patients with AR (rejectors) contained a significantly higher proportion of the immature CD56brightCD16– subset and a lower cytolytic CD56dimCD16+ in the total blood-circulating NK cells than patients with steady immunity. Both subsets contained a high NKp30-positive population, and CD56dimCD16+ additionally exhibited a high NKp46-positive ratio. The NKp30-positive ratio in CD56dimCD16+ subset showed the most prominent AR predictive ability before LTx and was an independent risk factor of LTx AR. After transplantation, the blood-circulating NK cells in rejectors maintained a higher CD56brightCD16− and lower CD56dimCD16+ composition than the controls throughout the first year after LTx. Moreover, both subsets maintained a high NKp30-positive ratio, and CD56dimCD16+ retained a high NKp46-positive ratio. The blood-circulating NK cell subset composition was consistent during AR, while the expressions of NKp30 and NKp46 were augmented. Collectively, a more immature CD56brightCD16− subset composition and an activated phenotype of high NKp30 expression were the general properties of blood-circulating NK cells in rejected LTx recipients, and the NKp30-positive ratio in CD56dimCD16+ NK subset before LTx possessed AR predictive potential.
T cells are key mediators of alloresponse during liver transplantation (LTx). However, the dynamics of donor-reactive T-cell clones in peripheral blood during a clinical T-cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) episode remain unknown. Here, we collected serial peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples spanning from pre-LTx to 1 year after LTx and available biopsies during the TCMR episodes from 26 rejecting patients, and serial peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples were collected from 96 nonrejectors. Immunophenotypic and repertoire analyses were integrated on T cells from rejectors, and they were longitudinally compared to nonrejected patients. Donor-reactive T-cell clone was identified and tracked by cross-matching with the mappable donor-reactive T-cell receptor repertoire of each donor-recipient pair in 9 rejectors and 5 nonrejectors. Before transplantation, the naive T-cell percentage and T-cell receptor repertoire diversity of rejectors was comparable to that of healthy control, but it was reduced in nonrejectors. After transplantation, the naïve T-cell percentages decreased, and T-cell receptor repertoires were skewed in rejectors; the phenomenon was not observed in nonrejectors. Alloreactive clones increased in proportion in the peripheral blood of rejectors before TCMR for weeks. The increase was accompanied by the naïve T-cell decline and memory T-cell increase and acquired an activated phenotype. Intragraft alloreactive clone tracking in pre-LTx and post-LTx peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples revealed that the pretransplant naïve T cells were significant contributors to the donor-reactive clones, and they temporarily increased in proportion and subsequently reduced in blood at the beginning of TCMR. Together, our findings offer an insight into the dynamic and origin of alloreactive T cells in clinical LTx TCMR cases and may facilitate disease prediction and management.