Haoxi Zhang

Haoxi Zhang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 October 2019 in IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HZHaoxi Zhang
Haoxi Zhang
ZXZhiwen Xiao
Zhiwen Xiao
JWJuan Wang
Juan Wang
FLFei Li
Fei Li
ESEdward Szczerbicki
Edward Szczerbicki

1 May 2021 in Knowledge-Based Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZXZhiwen Xiao
Zhiwen Xiao
XXXin Xu
Xin Xu
HZHaoxi Zhang
Haoxi Zhang
ESEdward Szczerbicki
Edward Szczerbicki

1 March 2019 in Future Generation Computer Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCesar Sanin
Cesar Sanin
HZHaoxi Zhang
Haoxi Zhang
ISImran Shafiq
Imran Shafiq
MWMaqbool Waris
Maqbool Waris
COCaterine Silva de Oliveira
Caterine Silva de Oliveira
ESEdward Szczerbicki
Edward Szczerbicki

1 February 2012 in Cybernetics and Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCesar Sanín
Cesar Sanín
LMLeonardo Mancilla-Amaya
Leonardo Mancilla-Amaya
HZHaoxi Zhang
Haoxi Zhang
ESEdward Szczerbicki
Edward Szczerbicki
Knowledge and experience engineering techniques are becoming increasingly useful and popular components of hybrid integrated systems used to solve complex real-life problems in different disciplines. These techniques offer features such as learning from experience, handling noisy and incomplete data, helping with decision making, and predicting capabilities. In this article, we present a number of different applications of a multidomain knowledge representation structure called decisional DNA that can be implemented and shared for the exploitation of embedded knowledge within different technologies.

23 December 2016 in Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HZHaoxi Zhang
Haoxi Zhang
CSCesar Sanin
Cesar Sanin
ESEdward Szczerbicki
Edward Szczerbicki
MZMing Zhu
Ming Zhu
In this paper, we propose the Neural Knowledge DNA, a framework that tailors the ideas underlying the success of neural networks to the scope of knowledge representation. Knowledge representation is a fundamental field that dedicates to representing information about the world in a form that computer systems can utilize to solve complex tasks. The proposed Neural Knowledge DNA is designed to support discovering, storing, reusing, improving, and sharing knowledge among machines and computing devices. It is constructed in a similar fashion of how DNA formed: built up by four essential elements. As the DNA produces phenotypes, the Neural Knowledge DNA carries information and knowledge via its four essential interrelated elements, namely, Networks, Experiences, States, and Actions; which store the detail of the artificial neural networks for training and reusing such knowledge. The novelty of this approach is that it uses previous decisional experience to collect and expand intelligence for future decision making formalized support. The experience based collective computational techniques of Set of Experience Knowledge Structure (SOEKS) and Decisional DNA (DDNA) are used to develop aforesaid decisional sustenance. Together with artificial neural networks and reinforcement learning, the proposed Neural Knowledge DNA is used to catch knowledge of a very simple maze problem, and the results show that our Neural Knowledge DNA is a very promising knowledge representation approach for artificial neural network-based intelligent systems.

1 January 2020 in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
YZYang Zhou
Yang Zhou
HZHaoxi Zhang
Haoxi Zhang
YLYuan Li
Yuan Li
GNGuangjian Ning
Guangjian Ning
As a reliable cardiovascular system, ECG has been widely used in the detection of heart rhythms. This paper presents an attention-based ResNet processing of ECG data. Respectively are MIT and PTB Diagnostics datasets. The model is prominent in both data sets. And the accuracy in MIT datasets is 96.2%. And in PTB datasets the accuracy is 99.6%.