Yongxian Wang

Dr. Yongxian Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 June 2025 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYi Liu
Yi Liu
XHXiang Han
Xiang Han
HZHongjian Zhang
Hongjian Zhang
SLShuangxi Liu
Shuangxi Liu
Ma WeiMa Wei
Ma Wei
JWJinxing Wang
Jinxing Wang
Accurate detection of Jinxiu Malus fruits in unstructured orchard environments is hampered by frequent overlap, occlusion, and variable illumination. To address these challenges, we propose YOLOv8-MSP-PD (YOLOv8 with Multi-Scale Pyramid Fusion and Proportional Distance IoU), a lightweight model built on an enhanced YOLOv8 architecture. We replace the backbone with MobileNetV4, incorporating unified inverted bottleneck (UIB) modules and depth-wise separable convolutions for efficient feature extraction. We introduce a spatial pyramid pooling fast cross-stage partial connections (SPPFCSPC) module for multi-scale feature fusion and a modified proportional distance IoU (MPD-IoU) loss to optimize bounding-box regression. Finally, layer-adaptive magnitude pruning (LAMP) combined with knowledge distillation compresses the model while retaining performance. On our custom Jinxiu Malus dataset, YOLOv8-MSP-PD achieves a mean average precision (mAP) of 92.2% (1.6% gain over baseline), reduces floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 59.9%, and shrinks to 2.2 MB. Five-fold cross-validation confirms stability, and comparisons with Faster R-CNN and SSD demonstrate superior accuracy and efficiency. This work offers a practical vision solution for agricultural robots and guidance for lightweight detection in precision agriculture.

13 November 2025 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWYongxian Wang
Yongxian Wang
KZKaisen Zhang
Kaisen Zhang
YLYi Liu
Yi Liu
JLJunsheng Liu
Junsheng Liu
RLRuofei Liu
Ruofei Liu
JWJinxing Wang
Jinxing Wang
Non-destructive assessment of kiwifruit quality is critical for postharvest preservation and grading. This paper proposes a novel quantitative evaluation method for the kiwifruit comprehensive quality index (KCQI) during shelf life, based on hyperspectral imaging (HSI) combined with a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN). Hyperspectral images of two kiwifruit cultivars were acquired at four shelf-life stages using an HSI system, and six quality parameters were measured as reference standards. Based on correlation and factor analyses, five key parameters—soluble solids content, firmness, L*, b*, and chroma—were selected to construct the KCQI. Three spectral band selection methods and three modeling algorithms were compared, with the competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS)–1D-CNN model yielding the highest prediction accuracy (RP2 = 0.82, RMSEP = 0.26, RPDP = 2.39). Subsequently, a spatial distribution map was generated to visualize the KCQI. These results demonstrate the potential of the HSI–1D-CNN approach for accurate postharvest quality monitoring and intelligent grading.

11 May 2026 in Horticulturae
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYi Liu
Yi Liu
KZKaisen Zhang
Kaisen Zhang
LJLinlong Jing
Linlong Jing
HXHan Xiang
Han Xiang
YWYongxian Wang
Yongxian Wang
JWJinxing Wang
Jinxing Wang
To address the challenge of apple picking-point localization under severe occlusion and complex backgrounds in dwarf rootstock high-density orchards, this paper proposes a target-region-segmentation-based 3D localization method in which the fruit sphere center is defined as the picking point. A lightweight occlusion-aware semantic segmentation network, OA-LiteSegNet, is developed to generate accurate foreground masks for partially visible apples. Guided by the segmentation result, a local target-region point cloud is reconstructed from the depth map and further processed by robust sphere fitting to estimate the apple sphere center and fruit diameter. Experimental results show that OA-LiteSegNet achieves 90.35% mIoU and 76.27% BF1 with only 5.92 M parameters and 11.30 GFLOPs, while reaching an inference speed of 128.40 FPS, achieving a favorable accuracy–efficiency trade-off among the compared mainstream models. The proposed 3D localization method achieves an average sphere-center error of 2.88 mm, which is 68.4% lower than that of the conventional bounding-box-center back-projection method (9.11 mm), and maintains stable performance across different occlusion types. These results demonstrate the potential of the proposed method for real-time and accurate apple localization under controlled laboratory occlusion scenarios, while further field validation in real orchards remains necessary.

8 October 2026 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YXYinxiang Xu
Yinxiang Xu
航王航 王
航 王
ZGZhanbo Gao
Zhanbo Gao
SMShuhe Meng
Shuhe Meng
HZHongjian Zhang
Hongjian Zhang
WPWei Pan
Wei Pan
Apple-harvesting perception must remain usable when depth measurements are unavailable. This study evaluates a single four-channel YOLOv8s-OBB detector that accepts RGB-D input when depth is available and RGB-Z input, with a zero-filled fourth channel, when depth is absent. Training-only input-level modality dropout exposes the detector to both sensing states without changing the inference graph. Apples are assigned to three operational visual categories—ripe_pickable, ripe_unpickable, and unripe—and oriented bounding boxes provide image-plane geometric cues. On an image-level split of 542 orchard images, pdrop = 0.5 gave the highest observed full-test mAP50 and mAP50-95 among the tested settings, at 0.7199 and 0.5380. Under full-test forced RGB-Z input, mAP50 was 0.7064, compared with 0.5906 without modality dropout and 0.6952 for the RGB-only baseline. On the paired night-time subset, mAP50 curve AUCs under three graded missing-depth masks were 0.7225–0.7355, compared with 0.6088–0.6444 without dropout. These results demonstrate empirical missing-depth tolerance within a single detector under the evaluated conditions. The dropout setting is empirical, and the results are single-run point estimates. Daytime images lack paired depth, so day/night comparisons do not isolate illumination robustness; the image-level split also does not establish scene-independent generalization. OBB outputs are image-plane cues, and the exploratory geometry-only simulation does not validate robotic grasping or field harvesting success.