Huilin Liu

Ms. Huilin Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 July 2025 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLingyao Wang
Lingyao Wang
HLHuilin Liu
Huilin Liu
XLXiaoyan Liu
Xiaoyan Liu
RFRen fangrong
Ren fangrong
Land urbanization enables a thorough perspective to explore the decoupling of land use environmental efficiency (LUEE) and energy use, thereby supporting the shift into low-carbon land use by emphasizing energy conservation and reducing carbon emissions. This paper first calculates LUEE from 2011 to 2021 by using the EBM-DEA model in China. The geographical detector model is used to examine the driving factors of land use environmental efficiency. The results show the following: (1) China’s LUEE is high in general but shows a clear pattern of spatial differentiation internally, with the highest values in the eastern region represented by Beijing, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang, while the central and western regions show lower LUEE because of their irrational industrial structure and lagging green development. (2) Energy consumption, economic development, industrial upgrading, population size, and urban expansion are the driving factors. Their explanatory power for the spatial stratification heterogeneity of land use environmental impacts varies. (3) Urban expansion has the greatest impact on the spatial differentiation of land use environmental effects, while energy consumption also shows significant explanatory strength. In contrast, economic development and population size exhibit relatively weaker explanatory effects. (4) The interaction of the two driving factors has a greater impact on LUEE than their individual effects, and the interaction is a two-factor enhancement. Finally, we make targeted recommendations to help improve land use environmental efficiency.

13 October 2025 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRen fangrong
Ren fangrong
FSFang-Yi Sun
Fang-Yi Sun
XLXiao-Yan Liu
Xiao-Yan Liu
HLHuilin Liu
Huilin Liu
As a major energy producer and consumer, China has witnessed rapid growth in carbon emissions, which are closely linked to changes in regional climate and the environment. Water, energy, and food (W-E-F) are the three most critical components of human production and daily life, and achieving the coordinated development of these three resources and connecting them with climate change through the carbon emissions generated during their utilization processes has become a key issue for realizing regional ecological sustainable development. This study constructs a dynamic two-stage network slack-based measure-data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) model, which integrates the water–energy–food (W-E-F) system with the climate change process to evaluate China’s comprehensive ecological efficiency from 2011 to 2022, and adopts the Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition, kernel density estimation, hierarchical clustering, and geographical detector model to analyze provincial panel data, thereby assessing efficiency patterns, regional differences, and driving mechanisms. The novelty and contributions of this study can be summarized in three aspects. First, it establishes a unified framework that incorporates the W-E-F nexus and climate change into a dynamic network SBM-DEA model, enabling a more systematic assessment of ecological efficiency. Second, it uncovers that interregional overlap effects and policy-driven factors are the dominant sources of spatial and temporal disparities in ecological efficiency. Third, it further quantifies the interactive effects among key driving factors using Geodetector, thus offering practical insights for regional coordination and policy design. The results show that China’s national ecological efficiency is at a medium level. Southern China has consistently maintained a leading position, while provinces in northwest and southwest China have remained relatively backward; the efficiency of the water–energy–food integration stage is relatively high, whereas the efficiency of the climate change stage is medium and exhibits significant temporal fluctuations. Interregional differences are the main source of efficiency gaps; ecological quality, environmental protection efforts, and population size are identified as the primary driving factors, and their interaction effects have intensified spatial heterogeneity. In addition, sub-indicator analysis reveals that the efficiency related to total wastewater, air pollutant emissions, and agricultural pollution shows good synergy, while the efficiency associated with sudden environmental change events is highly volatile and has weak correlations with other undesirable outputs. These findings deepen the understanding of the water–energy–food-climate system and provide policy implications for strengthening ecological governance and regional coordination.

14 July 2025 in Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRen fangrong
Ren fangrong
HLHuilin Liu
Huilin Liu
XLXiaoyan Liu
Xiaoyan Liu
Wind power is a core component of a clean energy system. The efficiency of a wind power system evolves through coordinated interactions. These interactions occur among three regional subsystems: resource subsystem, technology subsystem, and economy subsystem. To reveal the operational mechanisms of its internal subsystems, this study analyzes the comprehensive efficiency of the wind power system in China from 2010 to 2022. The two-stage EBM model, the Tobit regression model and the feedforward neural network model are employed in combination. The results show that: (1) The comprehensive efficiency of the wind power system has gradually improved, but shows spatiotemporal variations due to uneven subsystem coordination. (2) The improvement of efficiency is characterized by stages. The optimization of technology subsystems drives the development stage, while economic scaling dominates the operation stage (though operation and maintenance technologies remain deficient). (3) The correlation between development and operation stages is suboptimal, and the coordination of subsystems remains weak. (4) Technology innovation and electricity demand boost comprehensive efficiency, while human resources hinder it. Extreme weather exerts either a contributing or an interfering effect on the system. (5) Future projections show continued efficiency growth. The study concludes with cross-system coordination strategies to enhance the contribution of wind power in clean energy.