Jonathan W. Yewdell

Dr. Jonathan W. Yewdell

Cellular Biology Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Bethesda, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 1999 in Annual Review of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JYJonathan W. Yewdell
Jonathan W. Yewdell
JBJack R. Bennink
Jack R. Bennink
▪ Abstract Of the many thousands of peptides encoded by a complex foreign antigen that can potentially be presented to CD8+ T cells (TCD8+), only a small fraction induce measurable responses in association with any given major histocompatibility complex class I allele. To design vaccines that elicit optimal TCD8+responses, a thorough understanding of this phenomenon, known as immunodominance, is imperative. Here we review recent progress in unraveling the molecular and cellular basis for immunodominance. Of foremost importance is peptide binding to class I molecules; only ∼1/200 of potential determinants bind at greater than the threshold affinity (Kd> 500 nM) associated with immunogenicity. Limitations in the TCD8+repertoire render approximately half of these peptides nonimmunogenic, and inefficient antigen processing further thins the ranks by approximately four fifths. As a result, only ∼1/2000 of the peptides in a foreign antigen expressed by an appropriate antigen presenting cell achieve immunodominant status with a given class I allele. A roughly equal fraction of peptides have subdominant status, i.e. they induce weak-to-nondetectable primary TCD8+responses in the context of their natural antigen. Subdominant determinants may be expressed at or above levels of immunodominant determinants, at least on antigen presenting cells in vitro. The immunogenicity of subdominant determinants is often limited by immunodomination: suppression mediated by TCD8+specific for immunodominant determinants. Immunodomination is a central feature of TCD8+responses, as it even occurs among clones responding to the same immunodominant determinant. Little is known about how immunodominant and subdominant determinants are distinguished by the TCD8+repertoire, or how (and why) immunodomination occurs, but new tools are available to address these questions.

30 October 2009 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHScott E. Hensley
Scott E. Hensley
SDSuman Ranjan Das
Suman Ranjan Das
ABAdam L. Bailey
Adam L. Bailey
LSLoren M. Schmidt
Loren M. Schmidt
HHHeather D Hickman
Heather D Hickman
JYJonathan W. Yewdell
Jonathan W. Yewdell
Flu's Tricky Tricks: After vaccination against influenza A virus, single-point mutations are selected in hemagglutinin (the virus molecule that binds to sialic acid molecules on the surface of host cells) that escape neutralization by polyclonal antibody responses. Hensley et al. (p. 734 ) have discovered that in mice these mutations increased the virus's avidity for sialic acid. Amino acid substitutions that occur during reiterations of immune escape and avidity modulation can thus drive antigenic variation. This constant evolution of influenza viruses requires us to change vaccine components annually, and, for equine influenza, Park et al. (p. 726 ) show that as the match between virus and vaccine strains drifts apart with time, the probability of becoming infected and the length of the infectious period increase to the point where outbreaks occur. Nevertheless, even imperfect vaccines may be of benefit to a population because increasing the proportion of vaccinated individuals can supply enough herd immunity to offset a poor antigenic match, especially if used in conjunction with antiviral drugs. For humans, Yang et al. (p. 729 , published online 10 September) estimate that the rate of transmission within U.S. households puts influenza A 2009 H1N1 (the current pandemic “swine flu”) in the higher range of transmissibility, compared to past seasonal and pandemic strains. Thus, to achieve mitigation this fall, children should be the first recipients of vaccine, followed by adults—aiming overall for 70% coverage of the population.


2 April 2012 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAlexandre David
Alexandre David
BDBrian P. Dolan
Brian P. Dolan
HHHeather D Hickman
Heather D Hickman
JKJonathan J. Knowlton
Jonathan J. Knowlton
GCGiovanna Clavarino
Giovanna Clavarino
JYJonathan W. Yewdell
Jonathan W. Yewdell
Whether protein translation occurs in the nucleus is contentious. To address this question, we developed the ribopuromycylation method (RPM), which visualizes translation in cells via standard immunofluorescence microscopy. The RPM is based on ribosome-catalyzed puromycylation of nascent chains immobilized on ribosomes by antibiotic chain elongation inhibitors followed by detection of puromycylated ribosome-bound nascent chains with a puromycin (PMY)-specific monoclonal antibody in fixed and permeabilized cells. The RPM correlates localized translation with myriad processes in cells and can be applied to any cell whose translation is sensitive to PMY. In this paper, we use the RPM to provide evidence for translation in the nucleoplasm and nucleolus, which is regulated by infectious and chemical stress.

26 November 2009 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NNNir Netzer
Nir Netzer
JGJeffrey M. Goodenbour
Jeffrey M. Goodenbour
ADAlexandre David
Alexandre David
KDKimberly A. Dittmar
Kimberly A. Dittmar
RJRichard B. Jones
Richard B. Jones
TPTao Pan
Tao Pan
For cells to function properly the process of translating RNA messengers into proteins needs to be accurate, on the whole. Yet work in HeLa cells now shows that about 1% of methionine residues used in protein synthesis are aminoacylated to 'textbook-incorrect' tRNAs. Surprisingly, the proportion of Met-misacylated tRNAs increases significantly when cells are under stress through viral infection or treatment with viral or bacterial Toll-like receptor ligands. Tests with other amino acids indicate that the phenomenon is limited to Met, and as Met residues are known to protect proteins against damage from reactive oxygen species, one possibility is that Met-misacylation is a natural protective response to cellular stress. Accurate transfer RNA (tRNA) aminoacylation is necessary for translational fidelity; however, the accuracy of tRNA aminoacylation in vivo is uncertain. In mammalian cells, approximately 1% of methionine residues used in protein synthesis are now shown to be aminoacylated to non-methionyl-tRNAs. Furthermore, misacylation of methionine increases up to tenfold upon exposing cells to viruses, toll-like receptor ligands or oxidative stress. Translational fidelity, essential for protein and cell function, requires accurate transfer RNA (tRNA) aminoacylation. Purified aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases exhibit a fidelity of one error per 10,000 to 100,000 couplings1,2. The accuracy of tRNA aminoacylation in vivo is uncertain, however, and might be considerably lower3,4,5,6. Here we show that in mammalian cells, approximately 1% of methionine (Met) residues used in protein synthesis are aminoacylated to non-methionyl-tRNAs. Remarkably, Met-misacylation increases up to tenfold upon exposing cells to live or non-infectious viruses, toll-like receptor ligands or chemically induced oxidative stress. Met is misacylated to specific non-methionyl-tRNA families, and these Met-misacylated tRNAs are used in translation. Met-misacylation is blocked by an inhibitor of cellular oxidases, implicating reactive oxygen species (ROS) as the misacylation trigger. Among six amino acids tested, tRNA misacylation occurs exclusively with Met. As Met residues are known to protect proteins against ROS-mediated damage7, we propose that Met-misacylation functions adaptively to increase Met incorporation into proteins to protect cells against oxidative stress. In demonstrating an unexpected conditional aspect of decoding mRNA, our findings illustrate the importance of considering alternative iterations of the genetic code.

21 November 2000 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
USUlrich Schubert
Ulrich Schubert
DODavid E. Ott
David E. Ott
ECElena N. Chertova
Elena N. Chertova
RWReinhold Welker
Reinhold Welker
UTUwe Tessmer
Uwe Tessmer
JYJonathan W. Yewdell
Jonathan W. Yewdell
Retrovirus assembly and maturation involve folding and transport of viral proteins to the virus assembly site followed by subsequent proteolytic cleavage of the Gag polyprotein within the nascent virion. We report that inhibiting proteasomes severely decreases the budding, maturation, and infectivity of HIV. Although processing of the Env glycoproteins is not changed, proteasome inhibitors inhibit processing of Gag polyprotein by the viral protease without affecting the activity of the HIV-1 viral protease itself, as demonstrated by in vitro processing of HIV-1 Gag polyprotein Pr55. Furthermore, this effect occurs independently of the virus release function of the HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu and is not limited to HIV-1, as proteasome inhibitors also reduce virus release and Gag processing of HIV-2. Electron microscopy analysis revealed ultrastructural changes in budding virions similar to mutants in the late assembly domain of p6 gag , a C-terminal domain of Pr55 required for efficient virus maturation and release. Proteasome inhibition reduced the level of free ubiquitin in HIV-1-infected cells and prevented monoubiquitination of p6 gag . Consistent with this, viruses with mutations in PR or p6 gag were resistant to detrimental effects mediated by proteasome inhibitors. These results indicate the requirement for an active proteasome/ubiquitin system in release and maturation of infectious HIV particles and provide a potential pharmaceutical strategy for interfering with retrovirus replication.